This is scary

wan

Well-known member
Quick question:

Who has time for all this stuff? Is everybody either retired or unemployed? No young kids around the house?

I am employed but not full-time. I have two part-time jobs, which are both very casual. I work only 1.5 days a week, which explains why I have so much free time on my hands. No kids, either.
 

david starling

Well-known member
I am not an anti-semite. I have a friend who is half German, half-Jewish.

Just to be clear, I'm not anti-golf. Although I don't play the game myself, I have friends who do, and really enjoy it.

Also, I love the wide open spaces, and the greenery and trees of the courses I work near, gardening at private homes.
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
romney-.jpg
 

wan

Well-known member
Just to be clear, I'm not anti-golf. Although I don't play the game myself, I have friends who do, and really enjoy it.

Also, I love the wide open spaces, and the greenery and trees of the courses I work near, gardening at private homes.

Not sure if you are mocking me or not David, but yeah, not an anti-semite. Sorry to disappoint.
 

david starling

Well-known member
Not sure if you are mocking me or not David, but yeah, not an anti-semite. Sorry to disappoint.

No, your post just reminded me that I had said that Presidents and former Presidents shouldn't be allowed to golf, because it costs taxpayers too much money to keep them protected by the Secret Service.

Sounded like I was anti-golf, which I am not.

Eisenhower played the most golf of any President so far.
 

david starling

Well-known member
Not ONE House Republican voted for the stimulus package to help struggling American citizens!

Huge tax-cuts for the wealthiest, and now Republicans say there's not enough money for the stimulus!
 

wan

Well-known member
No, your post just reminded me that I had said that Presidents and former Presidents shouldn't be allowed to golf, because it costs taxpayers too much money to keep them protected by the Secret Service.

Sounded like I was anti-golf, which I am not.

Eisenhower played the most golf of any President so far.

I think they can golf, but it must be during their off days/personal time. We are paying them to work for us, we are not paying them to golf.
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member

i.e.
Judge rules days ago that
ARIZONA State Senate
may legally access ALL 2.1MILLION paper ballots
and
voting machines
for forensic auditing :smile:

Indeed

- thanks for highlighting need for INTEGRITY of the voting system
must be transparent to all

by the way

The Republican Majority Georgia Senate passed a bill
just days ago
requiring an ID card to cast an absentee ballot. :smile:
This is big news and the Democrats are not happy about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yC8-koInUEo

Steven Crowder found even more revealing things about the election

and the local states are scared

to the point where they're changing addresses
to even more addresses that don't exist.
Steven Crowder Discovers Even More On The Election
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7BDaHDreZU


.
...........
 

waybread

Well-known member
"Jewess" is not archaic. It is rare and unpopular, rather like "wrath" instead of "anger", but not archaic.

I was reading a Saul Bellow novel recently where it was used effectively and contemporaneously.

"Archaic" simply means out-of-date or old-fashioned.

Saul Bellow died in 2005. He stopped writing new works around 20 years ago. Which isn't to say that the term mightn't have been appropriate in historical context.

I might also add that in more heavily gendered languages like French, male and female Jews (and other groups) do have different gendered words (Le Juif, La Juive.) Today in English the only current gendered categories for people I can think of are actress (cf. the Academy Awards) and heiress.

Oh, and in Congress ("gentlelady" where "gentleman" was traditional.)

Now, that's archaic!
 

waybread

Well-known member
Yeah we have no life, yours is a lot more exciting than ours of course.

She has to, because "the sleepiness is strong with many" like you. Some call it propaganda, others call it the truth. Depends on your moral compass really.

Is this a personal attack? :unsure:

Actually my life isn't too bad these days, thanks.

My moral compass is in good shape.
 

waybread

Well-known member
We all have plenty of free time on our hands if you are following the 'expert' Faucci rules.

Stay locked up in your home with your 2 or 3 mask on. Social distance from other family members & NO hugging or touching.

Wait for the jabs, two for now, more to come.

But even after the jab, you are still not safe & must remain in the home locked up with your masks on & social distance from anyone in the home.

ALL based on science of course!

This is sheer hyperbole-- exaggeration.

I live in a fairly remote rural valley. Nearly everybody around here masks-up in public. Stores have dots on the floor or signs for social distancing. We haven't had a covid case in 3 weeks, according to our local hospital.

Is this similar to where you live or are your rates much, much higher?

Of course, if you want to go out without a mask and risk getting covid-19, that might be your prerogative. The trouble is, you would be likely to pass it along to someone else. Especially if you live in a more densely settled city, or have older or health-compromised people you care about in your life.
 

waybread

Well-known member
When Jovan Pulitzer gets over his pro-Trump tantrum, he could do this country a great service by inventing a hack-proof voting machine, efficient enough to count millions of votes in a reasonable amount of time.

It should be ready by 2022, or at latest, 2024.

Problem is, States can't be required to use it.

Texas, for example, has counties that recently purchased the worst type of machine for the 2020 elections: They leave no paper trail, making an accurate recount impossible.

The Dominion and Systematics voting systems used in 2020 were tested time and again. They were fine.

BUT OMG! Did I read JA's post correctly? 4 people in Texas cheated? Out of a voting population of how many millions?
 

waybread

Well-known member
Isn't it interesting that the 'most popular President' ever (over 80 million votes according to the 'results') has the lowest viewing rate on the official WH channel.....AND the ratio of dislikes to likes is around 20-1!

Yet, the 'non- President Trump just gave a speech at CPAC & received millions of views.....
& it wasn't even shown on any MSM.

Wow!

Just another 'statistic anomaly' I guess.

Donald Trump's popularity ratings, according to the highly respected Gallup Polls in years prior to the election were actually comparatively low.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

Or see this composite: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

This is why Trump chose to promote the Big Lie about the 2020 election being rigged. He knew ahead of time there was a good chance he would lose the election-- and didn't like it.

Joe Biden has been in office for only a few weeks. As of now he is polling higher than Trump ever did.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/

Don't forget the US is a big county. "Millions of voters" can still be a sizeable minority.
 

waybread

Well-known member
But in the case of Amazon, they are doing it not because they think conservative books will not help them make a profit. They are banning them due to ideological reasons.



I realize that, but that doesn't mean we the ordinary people can't discuss or or question them why they do what they do.

Besides, if you are an American, then your tax dollars go towards the military, so you do have the right to question them.

Sorry Wan, but if you're truly a conservative, you probably believe in laissez-faire capitalism. That means businesses can make decisions you dislike without consultation with people like you or me.

You can't really have it both ways.

Amazon distributes all kinds of books by conservative authors. Many authors actually have their own websites through which they sell their own books, or are on other book lists.

Don't you think, as a conservative, that the market place will solve the problem? If rightwing conspiracy theory books are wildly popular, other entrepreneurs will find ways to advertise and distribute them.
 

waybread

Well-known member
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me


Does no one see the very relevance of Martin Niemöller's quote here?

Biden supporters are fine for the moment. You're not the target yet, because you're still of use to the cabal's agenda. They needed your votes to win, even though there weren't actually enough of you, so they had to heavily cheat to get there. Once there's no one else left to feed on, you'll be next. Don't go complaining when that happens, because back when you still had the time to heed the warnings, you didn't. It'll be no one's fault but your own. :rolleyes:

Chia, we're all familiar with that quote. Trouble is, you've got your political parties reversed.

The last I heard, Trump's QAnon supporters are praying for a military junta to instate him on March 4.

That's not democracy.

And no, the 2020 election was not stolen. Although Trump and his supporters sure tried.

Y'all keep overlooking the fact that there have been something like 60 court cases challenging the 2020 election results. They've all been dismissed by something like 90 judges, including by Trump appointees.
 
Top