david starling
Well-known member
http://alternet.org/2018/07/reporter-thinks-russian-hackers-changed-votes-trump
Point is, voting machines ARE vulnerable to hacking. And, the Department of Homeland Security can either prevent that from happening, or....do it themselves!
[IMO] Regardless of who wins, if the Electoral College vote-result doesn't agree with the Popular vote-result, it wasn't a fair Election. Because, in the last 32 Presidential Elections, that's really only happened ONCE, in 2016, and was due to proven illegal FOREIGN interference.* Now, iF it happens again, making it twice in a row, it would more likely be due to DHS interference.
*[In the Bush/Gore 2000 election, once the final vote-counting was finally concluded in Florida, it turned out that Gore HAD actually won BOTH the Electoral AND Popular votes, but it was too late to correct the mistake.
So, the Electoral and Popular votes DID match in 2000.]
Point is, voting machines ARE vulnerable to hacking. And, the Department of Homeland Security can either prevent that from happening, or....do it themselves!
[IMO] Regardless of who wins, if the Electoral College vote-result doesn't agree with the Popular vote-result, it wasn't a fair Election. Because, in the last 32 Presidential Elections, that's really only happened ONCE, in 2016, and was due to proven illegal FOREIGN interference.* Now, iF it happens again, making it twice in a row, it would more likely be due to DHS interference.
*[In the Bush/Gore 2000 election, once the final vote-counting was finally concluded in Florida, it turned out that Gore HAD actually won BOTH the Electoral AND Popular votes, but it was too late to correct the mistake.
So, the Electoral and Popular votes DID match in 2000.]
Last edited: