obsidianmineral
Well-known member
Omg, stop hating on the the signs. All signs are good and bad in their own ways. I love all the signs and appreciate the different things they bring to the table.
If we're gonna be technical and speak strictly from the most objective point of view instead of giving opinions, the best sign depends on the natal chart itself. There are many factors that play into the way a sign functions during a chart. No chart will ever be presented where signs are expressed as pure as possible. Hence, the ruler of a sign and its position determines the expression to a point.
Let's say for example you've got Sun in Leo, which should be the best placement for the Sun. However you're looking at a night chart. Then you compare it with a Sun in Aries, which should be a great position for the planet that is better than in Leo in some places, but still can't compare to a Sun in Leo. However, the Aries Sun is in a day chart. Therefore, the Sun is more powerful and is expressed better in the second chart, considering triplicity helps the planet. So a planet can be better in some places. Considering essential dignities only, it's best to have it either in Leo during the day or Aries during the day in its second face (10º-20º). In these places of the zodiac the planet has the same essential dignity.
That would be the way in which the planet can express itself with the most freedom or the purest way possible. If you wanted to rate it basing yourself on how beneficial and productive, the point mentioned above is important, but a good aspect from a benefic is always super helpful. So, given these conditions, a planet can be beneficial depending on its aspects.
Last edited: