Review Your Favourite Youtube Astrologers

• I used to watch him a lot, But after moving away from the Vedic system, not so much. Sometimes he uses a lot of big Indian words which loses me. It's a turn off, because there are times I have no idea what he is saying. But when it comes to general things like Rising signs, Sun signs, Moon signs, etc., I've found him very informative.

• Definity very nice to look at (my apologies). She's very informative, and I enjoy her videos. She doesn't bog you down too much with Vedic technicalities so she is easier to understand, although she is sometimes not as articulate, perhaps due to her (albeit, very sexy) Bulgarian accent

• My favourite out of the three. She explains things in a very matter of fact way that is understandable by anyone. On top of it, she's very humorous, a BIG plus. My only issue is her take on astrology is laced with apparent subjectivity and an apparently lack of some very highly technical information. She comes across as an amateur than as a scholar of astrology, but she makes no qualms about it, and at least her videos aren't misleading.

The Ram said:

I agree, Lada Ducheva is quite attractive. I like her videos too. I watched one of hers on planets conjunct the SN just the other day.

Another one of my favorite youtube astrologers is Carl Boudreau, he puts up videos on monthly astrological influences.

Click to expand...

The_Saturnian said:

Kelly Rosano is quite a lively lady with a lot of interesting things to say. Especially when she says something like "...and that's your forecast for the month/year of XXXXX Leo. Enjoy it! & remember Leo you rock!!!" . I find her explanations quite detailed and analogical. It is easy for a beginner - intermediate level person to appreciate how aspects, transits etc. effect us by watching her videos.

Another valuable contributor is Diana Garland. She is very straight to the point, and has an 'easy going' way of explaining things and brings with her an abundance of experience she can draw from. I particularly find her to be a very pleasant person to listen to, especially in times of distress.

Finally I came across another woman lately who is also quite experienced. Her name is Laura (not sure of her surname). Her website is LiveVisionZ.com. Since I study palmistry/chiromancy on and off, I've tried to read her face and besides being quite a stunning attractive woman if I may so, she radiates tremendous spiritual energy from her face. Coincidently she is a psychic and a powerful one too. At her website, she has written a fairly lengthy account of her history of being a psychic, how she got into astrology and how this psychic power ran in her mother's side of her family. Quite elementary! P.S. She has Chiron, Sun and I think Mercury (from memory) in her 8th house. No wonder she's in tune with the stars.

Click to expand...

dioskouris said:

I used to watch him a lot. I but after moving away from the Vedic system, not so much. Sometimes he uses a lot of big Indian words which loses me. It's a turn off, because there are times I have no idea what he is saying.

Click to expand...

Moog said:

He has a strange way of pronouncing certain words, which probably doesn't help.

He calls the Navamsa 'Nimancha'

'Signifactor' instead of Significator

Karaka becomes 'Karka', easily confused with Karka which is also a term for the sign Cancer.

I'd read an introductory book on Jyotish, it's easier to pick up the terms.

Click to expand...

The Ram said:

I agree, Lada Ducheva is quite attractive. I like her videos too. I watched one of hers on planets conjunct the SN just the other day.

Another one of my favorite youtube astrologers is Carl Boudreau, he puts up videos on monthly astrological influences.

Click to expand...

dioskouris said:

I've noticed that when she speaks of the Lunar Nodes she equates the Houses to signs. For example, "Rahu in 5th House or Leo".

What is your take on that?

Click to expand...

The Ram said:

Doesn't bother me. I find a lot of modern astrologers do this in books or online. They correspond nicely imo, so a planet in the house or sign act prettty similar.

For instace my Ketu is in Sag in the 5th house and my fathers is in Leo (not sure of the house). Trying to become less ego driven (Leo/5th) is definitely a prominent theme in both of our lives.

Click to expand...

The_Saturnian said:

Another valuable contributor is Diana Garland. She is very straight to the point, and has an 'easy going' way of explaining things and brings with her an abundance of experience she can draw from. I particularly find her to be a very pleasant person to listen to, especially in times of distress.

Click to expand...

Moog said:

He has a strange way of pronouncing certain words, which probably doesn't help.

He calls the Navamsa 'Nimancha'

'Signifactor' instead of Significator

Karaka becomes 'Karka', easily confused with Karka which is also a term for the sign Cancer.

Click to expand...

dioskouris said:

Who else watches Youtube astrologers? I find them rather informative at times, and being a visual, aural person, sometimes I prefer watching videos on the opinions of astrologers. There are three that I watch on occasion:

KRS Channel

• I used to watch him a lot, But after moving away from the Vedic system, not so much. Sometimes he uses a lot of big Indian words which loses me. It's a turn off, because there are times I have no idea what he is saying. But when it comes to general things like Rising signs, Sun signs, Moon signs, etc., I've found him very informative.

Lada Duncheva

• Definity very nice to look at (my apologies). She's very informative, and I enjoy her videos. She doesn't bog you down too much with Vedic technicalities so she is easier to understand, although she is sometimes not as articulate, perhaps due to her (albeit, very sexy) Bulgarian accent

Alyssa Sharpe

• My favourite out of the three. She explains things in a very matter of fact way that is understandable by anyone. On top of it, she's very humorous, a BIG plus. My only issue is her take on astrology is laced with apparent subjectivity and an apparently lack of some very highly technical information. She comes across as an amateur than as a scholar of astrology, but she makes no qualms about it, and at least her videos aren't misleading.

Click to expand...

Ranglobal said:

KRS has positive points:

1) Good presentation.
2) Clear words & topic and very good treatment of the topic.
3) Rich in content
4) Proper explanation of most topics.

Negative

1) Poor knowledge of Sanskrit & Hindi which leads to mispronunciations like "Nimansha" for Navansha or Navamansha, "Dhhasha" for Dasha and so many.
2) He contradicts in some later videos against his own earlier videos like the one on gemstones. In 2 earlier videos he condemned Gemstone as remedy and in later videos he went on explaining & recommending Gemstones as remedy!! He himself keeps changing gemstones worn by himself with no explanation.

Click to expand...