EhabAtari
Well-known member
I've contacted John asking about Testimonies power and I've shared with him our thoughts and I've what I've mentioned and discuss with Jibreil through Real Madrid vs Rayo Vallecano game.
My email
Dear John,
Thanks for response, I've always looking if you are planning for 2nd edition and now I got the answer.
I am pretty sure that you are busy these days , I would love to share with you my point of view about the 2nd part of your email which is related about using your method in final and routine matches.
I've started using your method on May 2014 and please correct me if I am wrong:
You are absolutely right about you've stated about final matches and I think the reason behind that: both teams which are reached to final match could have almost the same power or strong degrees. Therefore, one testimony could make the difference and I think this also can be applied for all matches that include teams with almost same power (Strong team vs Strong team OR Weak team vs Weak Team).
The issue here from my point of view will be with matches that could have the case Strong Team vs Weak Team OR Strong Team vs Normal Team. I've walked through on a good number of charts since the beginning of the season and this is what I found:
When strong team plays against weak team, you will need at least more than 2 strong testimonies beside a weak team to beat - or at least draw - strong team (For example: such as 2 antisicon placement). Its look like that number of testimonies has to be considered if you have such a case, one or two testimonies may not be able break a strong team.
The same situation is applying on Strong team vs Normal team but with fewer requirements, you might have less number of testimonies beside weak team to help in breaking a strong team.
Finally, I would like to say “Thank you” for amazing book , it’s really a great efforts , I've read it more than 6 or 7 times and every time I am discovering new things and to be honest I am so loyal for your method when I want to analysis football matches.
Thanks Again,
Ehab Atari
John Response
Dear Ehab,
Thank you again for your compliments on the book.
Yes, you are right in that if there is to be an act of giant-killing we need some particularly powerful evidence in favour of the one killing the giant, else it will be 'business as usual'.
Best regards,
John
My email
Dear John,
Thanks for response, I've always looking if you are planning for 2nd edition and now I got the answer.
I am pretty sure that you are busy these days , I would love to share with you my point of view about the 2nd part of your email which is related about using your method in final and routine matches.
I've started using your method on May 2014 and please correct me if I am wrong:
You are absolutely right about you've stated about final matches and I think the reason behind that: both teams which are reached to final match could have almost the same power or strong degrees. Therefore, one testimony could make the difference and I think this also can be applied for all matches that include teams with almost same power (Strong team vs Strong team OR Weak team vs Weak Team).
The issue here from my point of view will be with matches that could have the case Strong Team vs Weak Team OR Strong Team vs Normal Team. I've walked through on a good number of charts since the beginning of the season and this is what I found:
When strong team plays against weak team, you will need at least more than 2 strong testimonies beside a weak team to beat - or at least draw - strong team (For example: such as 2 antisicon placement). Its look like that number of testimonies has to be considered if you have such a case, one or two testimonies may not be able break a strong team.
The same situation is applying on Strong team vs Normal team but with fewer requirements, you might have less number of testimonies beside weak team to help in breaking a strong team.
Finally, I would like to say “Thank you” for amazing book , it’s really a great efforts , I've read it more than 6 or 7 times and every time I am discovering new things and to be honest I am so loyal for your method when I want to analysis football matches.
Thanks Again,
Ehab Atari
John Response
Dear Ehab,
Thank you again for your compliments on the book.
Yes, you are right in that if there is to be an act of giant-killing we need some particularly powerful evidence in favour of the one killing the giant, else it will be 'business as usual'.
Best regards,
John