runnymede13
Member
I can tell anyone from personal experience, it's tough to restrain ideas about getting revenge when one has a lot of planets in Scorpio.
runnymede13 said:I can tell anyone from personal experience, it's tough to restrain ideas about getting revenge when one has a lot of planets in Scorpio.
That may be true, but having a lot of planets in Scorpio can also become an excuse for being cruel!runnymede13 said:I can tell anyone from personal experience, it's tough to restrain ideas about getting revenge when one has a lot of planets in Scorpio.
That's five planets in Scorpio. I would say that if Lotus has learned the wisdom of not trying to wound people when angry, that's pretty good evidence that Scorpio is no permanent barrier to compassion.Lotus said:Spot on Gaer! I am 29 and think I am finally getting a handle on things....slowly though!
I have Sun, Mars, Mercury, Venus & Uranus in Scorpio. I used to get very angry at people whom I felt did me wrong in some way. I realise that my anger was due my own insecurites and need to control.
I am a much happier person these days. In the past, there was a lot of internal stuff that I was not dealing with.
Feeling vengeful and angry is not fun.
Regarding Pacino: if the birth time given for him is correct, he has Pluto in the 12th, but very close to the AC, and Pluto makes several aspects, all hard.Jeremy said:A very interesting discussion: I very much enjoyed reading about the Scorpionic incarnations of Al Pacino; one of my favourite actors!
Peace,
Jeremy
gaer said:Regarding Pacino: if the birth time given for him is correct, he has Pluto in the 12th, but very close to the AC, and Pluto makes several aspects, all hard.
For instance, Pluto is semisquare Mars, only 4 minutes orb.
And Pluto is square Sun, Saturn and Jupiter.
Since at least modern astrologers associate Pluto with Scorpio, people who project a tremendous amount of power, power that we associate with Scorpio, often have Pluto placed in a very powerful but "hard" position.
Gaer
That site shows the AC as 4Leo54. My program and Astrodients both show 4Leo55, which is close enough for me. Pluto is 0Leo39. Pluto is clearly in the 12th. However, some people analyze a planet so close to the next house as part of it. What method are you using?Agriias said:I got my information on his birth time here: http://www.astrotheme.fr/en/portrait.php?info=1&clef=398RF83qAv4u
They have his birth time listed at 11:02 am. This puts his pluto in the first house, 4.20 degrees off. I consider that far, but I'm also not a hugely convinced that the AC/DC and MC/IC lines have that much significance outside of marking the houses.
We all know the talent is there. He was suprisingly unsuccessful regarding fame early in life. He was all but unknown until "The Godfather". So I would say he is one that "made it the hard way".Personally, I'm suprised not to see more super successs aspects and aspects to his uranus considering how famous he is, but maybe the mars in the 11th house makes up for some of that.
I have Mars in Scorpio. I've never been a vengeful person. Although I do have a temper, most of which I've learned to control with age, revenge makes me ill.Gracestars said:Hi all,
I'm new to this forum and still have a lot to learn about astrology so this site is a great help!
I have mars, saturn and pluto in scorpio. I have never considered myself a vengeful person. Perhaps this side of me is tempered by the strong influence of pisces in my chart? I must admit though, that I although I don't really have thouhgts about exacting revenge on others, I do have a very assertive and stingy side to me which I'm sure my mars in scorpio is largely responsible for!
I totally agree with that!Agriias said:Yeah, I agree with Gaer. The signs themselves are never bad, its the aspects that are formed to the planet in that certain sign which can bring about the negative qualities any given sign has the potential for.
Actually, my Mars is unaspected even by minor aspects except to Pluto. Even though the one aspect is difficult, it may have saved me from being walked over.I took a look at your chart Gaer. It was interesting to notice that you only had one hard aspect to your mars, pluto sq mars, 4degrees. It makes sense then why you wouldnt be vengeful as you dont have tomany issues related to your mars position. So there isnt enough hard energy to bend you out of shape and cause you to take action.
23Cap58 AC for you?Ofcourse, give anyone enough **** and they will eventually lash out, its just people with alot of hard aspects tend to lose their cool and fall into the extreme ends of a signs negative qualities easier.
Regardless, isn't it interesting that both these men have the same rising and Pluto in almost the exact same spot? I didn't realize that until I checked. Again, we have to trust that we are not getting dirty data re their birth times.Agriias said:The way I look at it is that they both have pluto in the first house and it shouldnt matter where exactly it falls. All that matters is the aspects to it. With all the other 8 houses we dont give any significance to the cusp of the house, so its never made much sense to me why we would for the AC and MC. Thus, I dont buy into using it.
I simply think of it as being terribly close to the AC and thus stamping his personality—IF the time is right. What strikes me about his chart is the difficulty of it. Look at all those squares and oppositions. Everything about the chart looks "edgy to me", as if he has had to overcome very difficult obstacles. I'd like to know more about his life.I also use astrodienst, However, I have a different philosophy regarding houses. Basically, the paramters of the houses are contained withen each given sign. So In the case of Al pacino, I dont consider his pluto 12th house, I consider it 1st house only. The houses are contained withen a given sign.
How would retrograde motion fit into your philosophy?The reasoning behind using this method is that I find it unreconcilable and confusing to have two signs in one house. Especially when there are planets in both of the signs in that given house. that just doesnt make sense to me. I also think that there can be confusion over this because after we are born the progressions begin and eventually the sign and planets in one house move over into the next and it can be hard to differentiate between natal issues/abilities from that of progressed ones. I dont know of anyone else who uses this method, so maybe it is idiosyncratic to how I do astro. Its worked very well for me though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_PacinoThats a good point about him making it the hard way. I didnt know that about him, I'm only 23 so he has been well established during my entire lifetime.
I was thinking in terms of this:Agriias said:I'm not sure I understand your question on retros? Could you be more specific?
My thought was that IF you are thinking in this way, it becomes important that some planets, when Rx, only move backwards in the chart when progressed.I also think that there can be confusion over this because after we are born the progressions begin and eventually the sign and planets in one house move over into the next and it can be hard to differentiate between natal issues/abilities from that of progressed ones.
I did. In fact, just to look for more people with Scorpio emphasized, I did a search for Scorpio/actors.Check out James Remar for another negative type scorpionic character.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Remar
Well, I'll consider the idea that I had of your having a great deal of energy right on the mark.I wrestled all the way through college and now compete im MMA(mixed martial arts). I got a broken foot at the moment though. It's actually been great, because I've put all the extra energy I have now that I'm not training everyday into these mental pursuits and I've learned alot in the last week. I've also learned alot technique wise about my ground game.
I have pretty good declinations for sports also.
It makes sense to me.Jeremy said:I concur, and I think the progressions are very interesting in Pacino's case too.
The 12th House placement of Pluto and your 1st House idea is probably just semantics because I entirely agree with you. To explore my view a little more succinctly I think it makes a big difference as to whether a planet is just in front of (out there, fully expressed, first impression) the Asc, or just behind it (bubbling under the surface, on the verge of being expressed, not quite visible) and that for me only adds to the Plutonic power in his chart since it is entirely analogous with the nature of Pluto itself; it is almost the best possible placement for it in that respect.
I hope that makes sense.