david starling
Well-known member
If you think about it, are there any reasons that Western culture since 400 A.D. does or doesn't look like the result of an Age of Capricorn?
The basic idea is that it didn't really overcome resistance from the combined momentum of the 3 previous tropical Ages--Libra (ancient Tigris-Euphrates), Scorpio (ancient Egypt), and Sagittarius (Hellenistic era)--until the middle period (circa 1300) and then began the gradual transformation into a mechanized, industrial culture.
It's the beginning of the Winter quadrant of Ages tropically: Cardinal (innovative) and of the Earth Element (materialistic)--a clear break with past cultures, beginning around 400 A.C.E.
This tropical Capricornian Age doesn't cancel out, the concurrent sidereal Age of Pisces, but it is dominate in the Western world.
Your thoughts?
No memes please.
The basic idea is that it didn't really overcome resistance from the combined momentum of the 3 previous tropical Ages--Libra (ancient Tigris-Euphrates), Scorpio (ancient Egypt), and Sagittarius (Hellenistic era)--until the middle period (circa 1300) and then began the gradual transformation into a mechanized, industrial culture.
It's the beginning of the Winter quadrant of Ages tropically: Cardinal (innovative) and of the Earth Element (materialistic)--a clear break with past cultures, beginning around 400 A.C.E.
This tropical Capricornian Age doesn't cancel out, the concurrent sidereal Age of Pisces, but it is dominate in the Western world.
Your thoughts?
No memes please.
Last edited: