The great mystery which my unfolding of Nietzsches phllosophic logic addresses, and frankly reveals, is how "mere" interpreting is the very act of becoming one with something, integrating it into ones being.
So it matters greatly on which portions of astrological truth one focusses ones interpretative faculties, because being itself is a biological interpreting of matter into portions of change, values. A piece of fruit is a portion of change we ingest, and we have evolved to select those portions of change that makes us change while remaining present. If we come to value portions of change that makes us change and dissolve, like poison, such as in excessive drug use, we cease to exist, we value but don't self-value.
The same principle applies on any level of ingestion, also on the level of beliefs, which can either feed us or destroy us, and on simple observation of things. Nietzsche says it wonderfully: "if you stare too deep into the abyss, the abyss will stare back into you." With astrology, there is a literal infinitude of factors at play, and we can only integrate a very finite set. It is thus, and this hasn't been sown so far, crucial which portions of astrological truth one commits to. One can understand oneself in many ways. But this actually means; one can become many different selves.
"The point of life is not to find oneself, or to find anything; it is to create oneself.", from memory quoting Bob Dylan in the new Rolling Thunder Revue film - this is the truth. Because, at the very depth of the cosmos we do not simply inhabit, but of which we form, by the effort of our being, the fibers, existence is only creation. It is not a creation, it is eternally the very act of creation. And we ourselves are nothing besides this creating, and nothing besides. So all glances we cast hither or thither are portions of our future being, portions of change, values we ingest.