not at all
there is no evidence as to whether dwarf planet pluto
has any links to 'healing' or not
so does jupiter there is no evidence that he has any links to 'luck' or not
not at all
there is no evidence as to whether dwarf planet pluto
has any links to 'healing' or not
IF pluto IS an astrological planetthis is a stupid topic like you trying to prove that pluto is not an astrological planet
ive seen maney charts and it is just amazing how pluto influence the chart
unlike dwarf planet plutoso does jupiter there is no evidence that he has any links to 'luck' or not
unlike dwarf planet pluto
Jupiter is
not only an astrological planet
but also an astronomical planet
Very odd questionJA are you drunk ?
That's wishful thinkingPluto is an
astronomical planet as well ..
That's wishful thinking
the fact is that astronomically speaking
the reason pluto is an astronomical dwarf planet
is
because there are multiple objects similar in size and mass to pluto
that are all in the same orbit as pluto
and until pluto crashes into these objects and then absorbs them after the collision
pluto will remain an astronomical dwarf planet
all those planets you mentioned are astronomical planets as well as astrological planets
okay it is an astronomical dwarf planet
but it's influence is just like the influence of jupiter sun moon mars neptune uranus ....
all those planets you mentioned are astronomical planets as well as astrological planets
but not dwarf planet pluto which was mistakenly presented as a planet
the rationale of this thread isand this is your evidence that jupiter has links to luck XD
the rationale of this thread is
to discuss whether or not dwarf planet pluto is an astrological planet or not
I simply responded to your comment
that Jupiter is an astrological planet as well as an astronomical planet
in direct contrast with dwarf planet pluto which is most definitely not an astronomical planet
there is also the fact that
there is a dwarf planet bigger than dwarf planet pluto
yet no one is demanding dwarf planet ERIS to be treated as 'an astrological planet'
You have been misinformed
pluto is bigger then eris
Practice what you preachJa please have some knoweldge
and then come and talk
if you know nothing dont talk
You have been misinformed
Practice what you preach
'.....Eris is the most-massive and second-largesthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eris_(dwarf_planet)#cite_note-footnoteI-18 dwarf planet known in the Solar System.
It is the ninth-most-massive body known to directly orbit the Sun
Eris is 27% more massive than dwarf planet pluto,
though pluto is slightly larger by volume. Eris's mass is about 0.27% of the Earth's mass....'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eris_(dwarf_planet)#cite_note-Brown_Schaller_2007-12https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eris_(dwarf_planet)#cite_note-070614_eris_mass-20
science again
i wonder why do you want so badly to prove that pluto is not planet or astrological planet .
We just disagree
Many astrologers disagree
It's not unusual
The thread discussion is simply regarding whether pluto is or is not an astrological planet
we already proved that dwarf planet pluto is not an astronomical planet
and that dwarf planet ERIS is larger than pluto
yet strangely no one has a response regarding
the lack of demand to make ERIS an astrological planet
not to mention all the other dwarf planets
That is misinformed and in any event, the discussion does not concern dwarf planet pluto's alleged 'enegy'maney astrologyers *agree* that pluto is an astrological planet
FEW astrologers disagree
and ALL the people feel pluto energy except you
That is misinformed and in any event, the discussion does not concern dwarf planet pluto's alleged 'enegy'
but whether or not pluto can be considered an astrological planet
even if it is not an astronomical planet
and
also given that dwarf planet Eris is bigger than dwarf planet pluto
it makes no sense that no one is questioning why Eris is not an astrological planet as well
Perhaps not in the Westbecause astrology is not science