Oblique Ascension is difficult enough (I'm still trying to understand it,) but how are you calculating it using Diurnal Hours? This is the reason astrologers need to be good at math.
The Ascendant axis tells the length of day (or night) at your Latitude at a given time in the year (Diurnal/Nocturnal Hours). The only thing going on here is this time is divided in half to show how long it would take the Ascendant to rise to the vertical point and that is roughly 2 "units" (I'm reluctant to say "hours"), 2 units and then 2 more units to the vertical point.
We're factoring in Signs of Short and Long Ascension, so if you happen to be at Latitude 34°03' and if the Obliquity of Earth happens to be 23°26' and if you happened to be staring at 27° Aries rising, then it would take 5 minutes before you see 29° Aries come up, but if you were looking at 27° Libra, it would take 10 minutes to rise to 29°.....hence Signs of Short and Long Ascension.
If I had to guess, I'd say it didn't really add anything that wasn't already known or inferred from the chart, so they used a simpler method of profecting in 30° increments, which is just fine and dandy.
I threw it out there so people would know there is an alternative method. Neither method is "right" or "wrong" or better than the other. Sometimes charts are "funny" and you need all the help you can get.
You mean like Mars sitting on the SR ASC?
Uh, yeah, something like that.
Ah. I still get stuck in thinking of the signs as the places as the houses.
But don't over-look the signification of the House Types.
Remember that Angular Houses signify the beginning of everything. In a Natal Chart the beginning of your life; in a Solar Return Chart the beginning of this year of your life; in Horary/Electional the beginning of the Question; and in Mundane the beginning of the event.
Specifically the angles show areas of your life; 1st House - you; 10th House - career/job/profession/reputation/honor/standing; the 7th - others; and the 4th - parents, home and family,
and what begins there.
In Solar Returns, the 7th would represent new relationships, but it should not be construed so narrowly that the focus is only on conjugal or marital relationships. Likewise the 10th should not be limited to "job" only, even though that is where you'd look in a Solar Return for a new job (but a "new" employer could simply be your company being taken over by another, or sold to another etc).
Succeedent Houses show a continuation of those things that already exist, while Cadent Houses show change or endings.
The ruler of an Angular, Succeedent, or Cadent House being in the same or another Angular, Succeedent or Cadent House doesn't really mean a whole lot.
It's when they are in other House Types that matters.
Cadent House Ruler in any Succeedent House indicates change; while in any Angular House it is something coming to an end. And here is where Retrogradation can help, because it often suggests slow painful change/ending (and the same would be true if the Significator Planet were impeded or otherwise distressed). When the Significators are in applying aspects, and Retrogradation is involved, then again, it can suggest something changing/ending abruptly, or forcefully, instead of simply dissipating.
Understand I'm talking about SR Charts and Mundane Charts mainly here, but in a Natal Chart, that will be a sort of Archetype or a Theme that plays out over and over in one's life.
With the 7th, it could be abrupt changes or forced changes in relationships, and that could be very broad as it relates to all relationships, or it could be very narrow, meaning only physical relationships, or only business/partnerships (think of musicians who were many different groups).
With the 4th, abrupt changes in family life, whatever they might be. You see that with adoptees, foster kids and sometimes people whose parents divorced.
Obviously 10th you're an hero, you're a goat, you're an hero....or changing jobs abruptly, changing career etc, and then of course, if the 1st House is involved, then life's a roller-coaster.
It's also applicable to health, wealth, travel, religion, friends, and of course death.
Succeedent Ruler in an Angular or Cadent House is same-same only maybe slightly more exciting, or slightly more dull.
An Angular Ruler in a Cadent House would be a slow start, perhaps even a "false start" and then in a Succeedent House something more balanced and paced (like a marathon runner would do), instead of being on a rocket-sled.
And don't forget the Signs.....the Signs can give hints to approximate time frames (up to 3 months, 3 to 6 months or 6 months to a year or longer) and then also show the "Degree of Rigidity."
A Fixed Sign suggests something straight and narrow, moving with a purpose and not a lot of flexibility. Moveable sights some flexibility -- which also hints that you have some control or input -- and then Mutable Signs which show very rapid fluid developments -- perhaps a little too much flexibility (to the point where one may be over-whelmed).
Ok. In natal charts from all that I have read we are supposed to look seven days ahead and back to see if any planets are stationing. Do we not consider Mercury here because his stations are actually shorter (meaning the need to adjust how far back and forward we look at Mercury in natal charts compared to the other planets) or is it just because we want to look at his condition exactly as it is in the moment?
Not aware of that. I have Mercury On-Station. I don't think a few days would make a difference.
I seem to recall something about newborn infants looking ahead, but I don't remember why, and my brain is scrambledy eggs right now, so I couldn't even begin to piece together the logic.
The reason we look ahead, is because of the terminology used....Venus
is seeking to join/aspect a Planet....as in Venus
needs or
wants to aspect a Planet.
How does that story end?
Does Venus get what she wants? Does Venus get what she needs? Does Venus find what she was seeking?
Is there really a Pot-O'-Gold at the end of that rainbow, or is it just Seinfeld ready with a snappy one-liner? Or maybe Officer O'Reilly -- you're busted.
And this success or failure to perfect the aspect, how well it succeeds or how badly it fails, is part of the archetypical life.
Planetary nodes are mentioned in all the old literature I've read, but I've not seen them used in practice.
It detracts from a Planets strength and fortune.
I <think> I understand why, but could you explain?
A lot of people would look at the chart, assume that Mercury is applying to Venus and then misinterpret that, especially since they are in moiety.
In reality, Venus has separated from Mercury, and Mercury is not seeking or want to aspect Venus at that time.
All right, since I keep getting mixed up with signs/places/houses, I printed the chart and shaded the areas that should be activated. Sometimes pictures help.
Yes, they do. Great idea.
Just to make sure I have it correctly, the signs by profection we are concerned with are the signs Mercury rules (Gemini, and Virgo, and since Virgo is the 9th sign in the natal, and on the 9th cusp, this is going to be how we get lawsuit into this year?) and the signs Saturn rules so Capricorn, Aquarius, and Libra.
That's one way, and note those are all Human Signs.
Human Signs indicate human involvement, as opposed to animal Signs....I would not expect to be sued by a giraffe, however I might expect to be eaten by a bear.
Human-to-Human Signs indicates humans; Human-to-non-Human is people to things, and non-Human-to-non-Human is what it is. If your house were destroyed in a wildfire, tornado, earthquake, landslide, sink-hole, hurricane or flood, you wouldn't see Human Signs there, but if your house was destroyed by arson, then yes, an Human Sign would be involved.
Health/Illness same way. Human-to-Human, or Human-to-non-Human would be the case for sexually transmitted diseases, any diseases that involved humans, like
Listeria or
E. Coli outbreaks, and other communicable diseases, like Tuberculosis.
Non-human Signs would be things like the Bovine Sponge-Bob Brain Syndrome, Lyme Disease, Rabies and such.
The natal ASC is in Capricorn, Capricorn is the second house and sign in the SR, and Gemini brings the 6th house and sign to the ASC? So we are looking at a 1st/6th/2nd highlight? This was how I was looking at SR's and profections last year, but when I asked Curtis (the deveoper of Delphic Oracle) to help me figure out a way to get all three charts on one wheel it couldn't be done, and he said he'd never heard of anyone needing such a chart. Which led me to believe I was doing something wrong.
Uh, I do it all the time.
I use SolarFire, and just pick a three-ring wheel, put the natal as the base chart, the profection around that, and then the return around that.
If I wanted, I could make the return the base chart, and then lay the profection and natal charts around that.
And, if I wanted, I could use a four-ring chart and throw Lots around the outside, or a Lunation Chart.
I know that there are astrologers who seem to think that the seven classical planets aren't enough and so want to add more planets and other assorted heavenly bodies, but frankly sometimes seven is too many. The idea is to figure out who's in the game and who's on the bench, right?
That is exactly right.
People said certain Planets cast light and additionally hurl rays at each other, not to mention they said that certain aspects are positive, while others are negative, and one can be either/or.
9,000 years later, science proved those people to be right.
Someone just recently said something about they have a Transfer of Light from Uranus to another......a Planet that doesn't cast/reflect light couldn't possibly transfer light to another Planet (which is one reason we don't use the Outer Planets......if you're waiting on a Transfer from Pluto, that just ain't gonna happen...not in this Universe).
At first I was going to ask falling in the sign in which chart (SR or natal) but then I figured <guessed> that we want to look at both...which planets are in the activated signs natally, and which planets are in those signs in the SR...because in this example, Mars in the natal is not the same Mars that is in the Solar Return chart. This is where sock puppets would be handy.
Nicely done.
Which is why it's probably a good thing that Venus is in Libra in the SR chart? This brings me to another diversionary question. Exaltation rulers. Lilly only gives planets in exaltation 4 points (please note, I'm not necessiarily a big fan of his weighing system) and no one seems to want to talk about them as alternate rulers of signs. My newbie take? feeling? impression? take your pick, is that plantes in exaltation (for example Saturn in Libra, or Mars in Capricorn, or Venus in Pisces) often have expectations that might not be lived up to by the rest of the chart, but they have huge bearing on the signs they rule by exaltation.
Okay, now I have something new to think about and research.
I use a simple scoring system of +1/0/-1 since something either aids a Planet, does nothing, or hinders a Planet.
If I were to use a weighted system, the only thing I would change is +2 for Exaltation or Fortune Degree, and -2 for Fall or Pitted Degree (so those either really help or really hinder) and leave it at that.
First, the doctrines about Exaltation are a wee bit muddled. There are at least three variations: a Planet is exalted in the Sign; the Planet is exalted only at the Degree of Exaltation; the Planet is not exalted until it reaches the Degree of Exaltation, and then continues to be exalted until it exits the Sign.
I consider the entire Sign. Seriously, the 27th (26°) 28th (27°) of Pisces are Pitted/Welled.
I fail to see how being Pitted in the 27th Degree of Pisces exalts Venus.
Likewise, the Degree of Exaltation for Mars in Capricorn is an Azieme Degree.
In a Day Chart, Venus in Pisces Below Earth is not the same as Venus in Pisces Above Earth. For one thing, Venus in Pisces Below Earth in a Day Chart is in Sect, while Above Earth she is not in Sect (which is not the same thing as being totally Out-of Sect).
An exalted Planet not in Sect tends to act haughty or arrogant (even more so when Angular).
Remember that Sect has to do with competence a great deal. An exalted Planet in Sect is going to be cocky/arrogant because of high self-esteem or self-confidence. And here's where applying aspects can modify that, because an aspect with Sun or Jupiter could lead to excessive pride, or over-confidence --- which can be harmful at times.
When not in Sect, that would be haughty or arrogant for other reasons, like short-comings, and here again, aspects with other Planets can modify that.
Wouldn't we need to look (at an ephemeris) to see what Venus is going to do next? And how exactly are we supposed to interpret separating aspects? Is the thing that was being pushed when the aspect was applying already incorporated, or is it just a case of "I'm all set with you?"
Sure, as always, separating aspects show what happened in the past.
"It's a Natal Chart...I don't have a past."
Yes, you do.
Obviously the separating Planet could not represent you (although if the 6th House were involved with the 8th it could indicate some kind of
in utero medical procedure).
If it isn't you, then logically it would be your sibling(s), parents, maternal grandparents, paternal grandparents, your mother's siblings, your father's siblings and so on.
Some separating aspects with significators for mother/father can indicate violence, verbal abuse, conflicts do to financial problems, or extra-marital affairs, or the could even indicate that your parents only recently married (with you being the shot-gun baby).
Obviously in Revolutions, Mundane and Electional/Horary Charts, separating aspects will have other significations.
Here's where House Types come into play: separating indicating something recently begun? Something that has changed? Something that has ended?
And actually, it would be,
"What is the Planet going to do next whilst in this Sign?"
Totally engulfs but does not intercept. Cusp of the 9th is in the 1st degree of Virgo, and Mercury is going to back up and square it, then go direct and square it again. This is where simply following the rules can cause you to miss something in the chart? As in can't see the forest for the trees?
I guess it depends a lot on how you view the whole Sign/House thing (no pun intended).
Myself, for all the research I've done, I conclude the Signs came first, but they did use an House System. It would have been elegantly simple and logical (I'm actually experimenting now with the system I believe they may have used).
Beginning in 2100 BCE, you have about 3,000 years of upheaval and conflict. Lots of disarray, and much knowledge is lost or forgotten. Then, more conflicts with the rise of the Amorite Kingdom, followed by the Assyrians and the Neo-Babylonians (not to mention conflict in areas on the periphery of Mesopotamia).
During that time period of conflict, it seems the only thing they were doing is calculating the Ascendant.
There's no Midheaven.
The problem with rituals, is that over time, people forget why they are doing what they are doing. Everyone hangs Mistletoe and puts out a Yule-log, but does anyone really understand why?
No.
But 400 years ago, the Puritans did, and that's why they banned Christmas (and birthdays and **** near everything else --- uh, when they weren't burning witches).
Think about that.
Really.
400 years ago, you had mechanical printing presses, followed by electromechanical printing presses, then radio, television, and the internet, plus wireless communication....
...and in the space of a mere 400 years, everyone has forgotten why we hang Mistletoe and why we light a Yule-log and why we do a lot of other things.
So....without all of those conveniences, how much knowledge do you think was lost in the space of about 1,000 years and in particular during periods of constant conflict?
Over time, they lost the many, many mathematical tables necessary to calculate the Midheaven and Houses and/or forgot how to do it -- because it wasn't taught or wasn't taught very well -- and then they forgot why they were doing it.
But then they learn the math again, start calculating the Midheaven again (probably because someone found a text or texts discussing the Midheaven) and that brought about Quadrants.
As you know, ever since then, people have been trying to figure out a way to crow-bar the Midheaven/Ascendant into an House System.
Very obviously, there's some over-lap, and the function of a proper House System is to show you how much (or how little) over-lap there is.
I could spend six days trying to figure out what's so bad about human signs, but the easier way is to ask.
Nothing is "bad" about them
per se. They indicate context, and here that would be human involvement.
Aquarius, Libra, Gemini, Virgo and the first 10° of Sagittarius are Human Signs, but note that Aquarius and Libra are also Violent Signs.
Aquarius and Libra are Violent Human Signs --- and so is Gemini if Saturn is in Gemini and if Saturn is also the Air Triplicity Ruler and he is Malefic (more so than usual meaning Sun is in an applying aspect to Saturn in Gemini and Saturn does not receive Sun, nor Sun receive Saturn, or Mars is in an applying aspect to Saturn in Gemini and there is no Reception). Similar for first 10° of Sagittarius --- depends on which Planet is sitting there, who is aspecting whom, and the level of Reception.
Getting back to MR, again most of the astrologers I know and/or have read (today's traditional astrologers, not the dead astrologers' society) seem to agree that MR by detriment doesn't mean a dang thing. But I see it as a sort of detante. Do you have an opinion?
Detente.
Wow, I haven't heard that word since the days of idiot Nixon and the other duplicitous idiot Kissinger.
Oppositions are conflict. The level and intensity of conflict, and the way in which the conflict manifests itself is based entirely on the two Planets involved, the level of Reception, and the Signs involved.
Moon and Mars are Planetary Enemies, but Venus and Mars are Planetary Friends (and Venus is the only Friend of Mars).
Reception is about "allowing" or granting permission. Being in a place you don't really want to be, and then having restrictions placed on you, or being forced to do things, makes being in the place you don't want to be that much worse.
But, being received, and so being allowed to act, is at least tolerable to some degree, and then when there's Mutual Reception, there's an air of civility, even though there may be intense animosity.
The stronger the MR, the greater the level of detente. It would be possible for two Planets to be Planetary Friends, and in MR, and then also have mutual reception by Triplicity or Bound or Face (or a combination).
The Signs are important, because Human Signs indicate human-to-human contact. Yes, Aries is a Violent Sign, but it is not an Human Sign, and that violence or malice would be directed at you by other means -- like attacking your wealth.
How do you determine "collision?"
Running to catch up to something is not the same thing as you running after something, and then that something turns around and starts running straight at you.
I need to spend more time with this one. I haven't figured out Mars yet in this chart, but I cannot help but think that Mars on the SR ASC isn't cool. The nature of Mars is to sever and separate...
1st House, beginnings for you in this year; something new.
I can't tell if he's a functional malefic in this chart, but at the very least he is doing something that he wouldn't normally do, doing something inappropriate.
Jupiter and Venus can never be truly Malefic. They can be less Benefic, and perhaps less Benefic in a Malefic manner, but nothing like Saturn or Mars could ever be.
Venus applies to Jupiter by trine, and Venus is able to help Jupiter, but before that aspect perfects the Moon will interfere.
Temporarily.
Getting back to the question of separating aspects, the Mars/Jupiter opposition is separating by about 3*. This should make the effect of the opposition still active, but color the interpretation. The quote above says that Jupiter is no longer paying attention to Mars. Which is seriously bad news because Mars is on the ASC and making his presence known. So whatever it is about Mars that Jupiter isn't paying attention to is going to bite him in the ***.
How to narrow it down? This is where I just started thinking. Because Mars is L12 and L4 (houses, not signs) and the exaltation ruler of 2. Ok, what houses from his position in Gemini can Jupiter witness? Or more appropriately, what are the houses Jupiter cannot witness? 12 and 2. So secret or hidden enemies and the second house of income.
Or large animals. Jupiter cannot really control or influence what happens in the Houses he cannot aspect by Sign.
So....if I would be you, I'd be looking for a Transfer of Light.
I know most think of that in terms of Electional/Horary, but it applies to Natal (long before Horary).
There are a few Horary Questions which rest entirely on whether or not the Ascendant Ruler aspects the Ascendant, or aspects the Ascending Sign. This aspect must be by Degree usually, but in certain Questions (usually related to health or death) it can be by Sign....it's enough for another Planet to transfer light from the Querent to the Ascending Sign.
A faster Planet that has separated from Jupiter and transfers light to either the 12th or the 2nd Signs/Houses would be enough.
And yes -- if there is a Transfer -- that suggests something or someone is helping you.
I know Bonatti and Lily say it requires some form of Reception, and I do agree, I just think Reception is related to willingness. A Planet that transfers light is going to transfer light no matter what (because that is a natural function of physics), but there is a difference between a reluctant helper, and one who is willing to go overboard, so the greater the level of cooperation, the better it will work.
Since the Signs/Houses and other Chart Points do not cast light or cast rays, they cannot be collected, nor could they ever transfer light themselves.
And here again is where Sect comes in. How competent is the Planet to perform the task it has been given?