Kaiousei no Senshi
Premium Member
Yes, but that's about like saying "Don't eat too much cake, it'll make you fat."
It has a much larger likelihood to be beneficial due to its color, brightness, and likened planet, and picking out two lines in an article that suggest some negative consequences of a star when certain conditions aren't met seems disingenuous at best.
Ah, I guess it was more of an overeaction to your post earlier discussing the shame, disgrace, and imprisonment that Castor supposedly brings.
It was sort of a "Say wha!?" moment.
I know Castor has an unfortunate side, but that seemed crazy bad. Heh.
I think you and Niplan are both right. And i have Uranus conjunct Castor @18cancer in the 3rd, trine mercury @ 18 scorpio conjunct the desc. I have read a lot abour Castor and pollux, and it is mostly good, but it can turn ugly.
I think you and Niplan are both right. And i have Uranus conjunct Castor @18cancer in the 3rd, trine mercury @ 18 scorpio conjunct the desc. I have read a lot abour Castor and pollux, and it is mostly good, but it can turn ugly.
smilingsteph said:Can someone tell me what Castor and Pollux has to do with this, I am curious.
Well yes, I'm not in disagreement with Niplan about Castor's nature. I just overreacted a bit because I thought the wording of the quote he took was too strongly negative for Castor. Can Castor be bad, certainly, I'm just not sure I agree with some of the wording chosen, that's all.
It came up because we were discussing the origins of degree influences...
Castor doesn't apply to making someone an astrologer, it was just an example that Niplan had personally from his chart concerning degree influences and fixed stars.
Aquarius 22° is the degree of my Jupiter, Chiron, and my Neptune is also in the 22-28° area, too! All are prominent in my chart, so I can be a good astrologer in the future! Woohoo! (The antiscion of my Selena White Moon is in 26°19' Leo, and I think in ordinal degrees, the antiscion is on Leo 27°, which is another indicator that I will become an astrologer).Julie, you are spot on, we don't need to give in to causal thinking, to say x=y is binary and only computers are comfortable with that. There is no astrologer=x configuration, however, as we all know "the stars incline, they do not dictate."
So that aside, I have found an original source from Nicholas DeVore "The Encyclopedia of Astrology" (Philosophical Library 1947):
"Several works, symbolical, speculative and statistical, treat of influences presumed to repose in certain individual degrees. Maurice Wemyss in the four volumes of his "Wheel of Life" even introduces some hypothetical and as yet undiscovered planets to account for certain qualities and effects. It is probable that many of the qualities ascribed to individual degrees have to do with sensitive points created by Eclipses, major conjunctions, or a close conjunction in both longitude and latitude between a solar system body and a fixed star, which points are accented by the transit of another planet at a later date. For ready reference a list of such points is arranged in a zodiacal sequence..."
Thus:
of Virgo 11°....An astrological degree,
and of Leo 25°....Alcoholic (25°-26°);
then of Leo 27° ....astrology (25°-29°).
And of Aquarius 22°: Astrological area (22°-28°).
There is however, no mention of 11° Pisces in his listing though.
I think this clarifies the Aquarian connection and through Aquarius' rulership of Saturn and Uranus, the debate about those planets being configured in the inclination to astrology in general.
Jeremy.
(Astrologer/Drunk)[FONT="]
[/FONT]