.......Traditional astrological texts are well worth reading for modernist astrologers particularly in order to check that their 'new idea' is not in fact ancient.
There are more dwarf planets discovered from 1990 to now, and we have dwarf planets added to the dictionary of modern astrology, not like before 1990 when it was only Ceres and other asteroids in Asteroid Beltback to the topic, to All
All,
Please stay on topic. This discussion is about whether there have been any significant developments in modern astrology from 1990 on. If you want to discuss traditional astrology or research methods, find a different Forum.
Back on topic,
Tim
This isn't about me at all. It's about a contribution to Modern astrology's body of knowledge. These tropical Ages have a huge advantage over the sidereal Ages for one reason - they can be delineated using astronomical calculations, with universal agreement on when the tropical Ages begin and end. And the reason for THAT is, the universal agreement on where the tropical sign-boundaries are located. Whereas, the sidereal sign-boundary locations are open to significant differences amounting to as much as 6 degrees.
When it comes to start-years for the sidereal Ages, an even 1 degree difference in sign-location changes the start-years for the sidereal Ages by 71.6 years!
Both types of Ages are occurring simultaneously on different wavelengths, and should both be considered as vitality important, imo.
I'd be happy to help, but it seems like your question is a bit unclear. Could you please provide more context or specify the topic you're referring to when you mention "modern"? This could refer to various fields such as technology, art, architecture, or even societal changes. The more details you provide, the better I can assist you with an accurate answer.
Yes, I can think of several areas.
1. Integrating the modern outer planets and sensitive points. See, for example, Henry Seltzer's 2015 book on Eris, The Tenth Planet; and Philip Sedgwick's website http://www.philipsedgwick.com/
2. Integrating western modern and traditional astrology. See, for example, Demetra George, 2008, Astrology and the Authentic Self.
3. Evolutionary astrology. Not my cup of tea, but see: Steven Forrest,The Book of Neptune. This type of astrology builds on the work of Dane Rudhyar and the theosophists, in seeing astrology as a tool for self-improvement.
See also the outlets for recent astrological research, like the magazine The Mountain Astrologer, and the National Center for Geocosmic Research.