Kuntuzangmo
Well-known member
Recently I've witnessed up close people getting into bouts (and when Mars was crossing back and forth over my ascendant participated myself). Emotions run high, insults flung left and right, nasty words, nasty emotions, observers of the bouts then talk about it, take sides etc....seems to never end......you know, a time honored human phenomena.
I personally feel that debate, exploring differing ideas through rigorous challenge is a really great thing. And in most societies, civil debate is expected....for instance in courtrooms, in hearings, in government etc...we see it all the time.
This highly civilized activity, however, in more mundane contexts usually gets railroaded by intense human emotion. Things escalate, people stop taking responsibility for their own thoughts and actions, they start accusing, dissembling, and soon what could have been a useful exercise descends into rigid positions of 'I'm right and you're wrong' and worse.
We love to feel passionate....about ideas, about our own views and positions, our cultures, religions...everything....but at what cost? Must we always make others wrong just because they have a different point of view? Is phenomena and possibility not vast enough so that differences can co-exist peaceably?
Or further, are we not vast enough to be able to actually take advantage of them and utilize differences for a greater whole?
We seem to have lost culturally (if we ever had) in our ordinary lives an appreciation, therefore a context, of healthy and happy challenge and debate.
We're viscerally suspicious of others' intentions and motivations, and perhaps rightly so. I don't know. Motivation might be an entire topic itself.
I'm curious how others feel about this and look forward to any comments on this subject.
I personally feel that debate, exploring differing ideas through rigorous challenge is a really great thing. And in most societies, civil debate is expected....for instance in courtrooms, in hearings, in government etc...we see it all the time.
This highly civilized activity, however, in more mundane contexts usually gets railroaded by intense human emotion. Things escalate, people stop taking responsibility for their own thoughts and actions, they start accusing, dissembling, and soon what could have been a useful exercise descends into rigid positions of 'I'm right and you're wrong' and worse.
We love to feel passionate....about ideas, about our own views and positions, our cultures, religions...everything....but at what cost? Must we always make others wrong just because they have a different point of view? Is phenomena and possibility not vast enough so that differences can co-exist peaceably?
Or further, are we not vast enough to be able to actually take advantage of them and utilize differences for a greater whole?
We seem to have lost culturally (if we ever had) in our ordinary lives an appreciation, therefore a context, of healthy and happy challenge and debate.
We're viscerally suspicious of others' intentions and motivations, and perhaps rightly so. I don't know. Motivation might be an entire topic itself.
I'm curious how others feel about this and look forward to any comments on this subject.