twelthnight
Banned
oh, strange...really can't seem to post chart or send a pm...is that b/c i'm new?
Actually the only proven evidence that shows planetary effects in the horoscope was done by Michael Gauqelin. He was not an astrologer but scientifically went about the task of proving or disproving astrology. How did he do this?
He linked planets in the chart to careers that people were in. For example, you would think that mars in the 10th or 1st house would be statistically significant (that means a higher than random statistical result) for say soldiers and athletes - (mars professions). He found that the western astrology angles - 1st, 4th, 7th, and 10th houses had no significant effect on determining a person's career - mathmatically.
But he did find 2 areas of the chart that statistically showed beyond randomness that certain planets in these areas did show up in career choices.
Many astrology skeptics were floored by his findings. Mathmatical proof beyond probability. Why these 2 areas would have more of an effect on a person I don't know.
The areas in the chart? The 12th house and the 9th house (roughly). I study Vedic astrology, too. And in Vedic astrology things are backed up about 20-23 degrees. I don't know if this means anything.
Anyway, the planets that were looked at (found to have an effect) when positioned in the 9th or 12th houses were jupiter, saturn, mars, moon and venus. Jupiter showed beyond probability as a career indicator for politicians, performers, actors, etc.., mars for athletes,... moon for writers.....saturn I think for scientists, and venus if I remember did show to have an effect. The sun no effect and the outer planets no effect - at least statistically.
Oh I see someone has already brought up these facts. Oh well this is just more support to that.
Thread with guidance method on level of FameI really like this, it's what I've been looking for and it's very, very accurate.
I have all my planets except Neptune conjunct angles.