Love2Know
Well-known member
Yeah so I would say scorp rising gemini sun then makes sense for ur look
Ascendant Sign Descriptions
- Thread starter Kannon
- Start date
Yeah so I would say scorp rising gemini sun then makes sense for ur look
Cypocryphy
Well-known member
Ah ha! You have a blockhead. Are you German by chance?
Sounds as if you can be an awesome singer!
Do your eyes bulge? ha ha. . . . . doubt it . . . .
Sounds like you got a good deal on that one!
I don't know about any of that, but I like your paintings!
Love2Know
Well-known member
Thanks I did those on an i pad.. Well the description is semi true I have huge legs though. The personality part rings a bell but I am also described as appear calm and laid back then bam I can burst out fast and be very present I guess. I do not like to be pushed around! Ummm eyes spaced apart wide hmm Yeah I guess I do not sing well... thnx
Attachments
I don't think this would be reliable...
Anyway, I would also say you look quite mercurian to me, maybe it is because of your sun in gemini; if I have to vote for libra or sco rising, I give my vote to Libra
but... what about virgo? 
Moog
Well-known member
I think it could be reliable, if we knew what we were looking for.
I've been collecting images and data and organizing them according to their sidereal rising signs for a while now.
I believe that the rising sign does impart a kind of physical character. I also believe that the particular placement of the ascendant ruler also gives rise to a particular look.
My notion is that you have a kind of major type (sign rising), and then a sub type (rising sign ruler condition), and both modified by aspects, probably... something I need a lot more data to check out properly.
I'm sure someone could do this stuff with a lot more efficiency.
Here's a section from sidereal Pisces rising;
I've been collecting images and data and organizing them according to their sidereal rising signs for a while now.
I believe that the rising sign does impart a kind of physical character. I also believe that the particular placement of the ascendant ruler also gives rise to a particular look.
My notion is that you have a kind of major type (sign rising), and then a sub type (rising sign ruler condition), and both modified by aspects, probably... something I need a lot more data to check out properly.
I'm sure someone could do this stuff with a lot more efficiency.
Here's a section from sidereal Pisces rising;
Moog
Well-known member
Here's an example of some facial similarity I've noticed.
These three well known men all have sidereal Capricorn rising, with Saturn in the 7th House, Cancer. That's if the birth data is accurate.
Three swallows don't make a summer as they kinda say. But to me, intriguing.
These three well known men all have sidereal Capricorn rising, with Saturn in the 7th House, Cancer. That's if the birth data is accurate.
Three swallows don't make a summer as they kinda say. But to me, intriguing.
Last edited:
PashenQuich
Member
For the update: I happen to be an Aries asc . At the 4th degree, in both elemental and Marcus Manilius decan systems, I'm an Aries decan.
Love2Know
Well-known member
I want to touch Orlando bloom sensually, but I would feel dirty after. He seems like a sexual douche.
Also, I would like to let the record show that I still believe you are a scorp rising oppose to Libra. Also, I am right. I am always right. Jk but not really.
Also, I would like to let the record show that I still believe you are a scorp rising oppose to Libra. Also, I am right. I am always right. Jk but not really.
Last edited:
Your face doesn't have this rawness that I attribute to Scorps, unless there's things in the chart to offset it. That being said you still use a Scorpio Asc time for your natal.
I have a website that will match up faces with celeb faces based on its facial similarity recognition system. Libra types, Sun or Moon, always get matched up with me even though that sign is irrelevant in my chart. I don't think Venus is particularly strong in my chart either, nor does it make any aspect to my Asc or Sun. Libras act nothing like me, and it's one of the last signs I would want to be.
I could see myself belonging to the neighboring Asc based off my birth time. There's no definite evidence based on physical appearance in my case though.
Why don't Germans smile?
I think it could be reliable, if we knew what we were looking for.
I've been collecting images and data and organizing them according to their sidereal rising signs for a while now.
I believe that the rising sign does impart a kind of physical character. I also believe that the particular placement of the ascendant ruler also gives rise to a particular look.
My notion is that you have a kind of major type (sign rising), and then a sub type (rising sign ruler condition), and both modified by aspects, probably... something I need a lot more data to check out properly.
I'm sure someone could do this stuff with a lot more efficiency.
Here's a section from sidereal Pisces rising;
Couldn't this similarity be equally attributed to them all being of European ancestry (possibly all of them being of Western European ancestry?), thus their facial structure would have a number of similarities? How does this sidereal Pisces Rising play out when you include people from African or Asian backgrounds who have that rising sign? Does it still hold up? It can't be considered a universal Pisces Rising trait unless it holds up across the racial board.
Last edited:
Moog
Well-known member
Yeah, I think so. There's a lot of white people here, not because I've deliberately excluded them, but because this selection happened to be all white people.
I'll make an attempt to source more different ethnicities from the ADB.
Moog
Well-known member
A few not entirely caucasian sidereal Pisces risers:
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Carter,_Ron
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Yo_Yo_Ma
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Kashkari,_Neel
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Armstrong,_Louis
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Sutton,_Komilla
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Carter,_Ron
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Yo_Yo_Ma
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Kashkari,_Neel
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Armstrong,_Louis
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Sutton,_Komilla
Last edited:
I don't know, the problem is that there are too many possibilities...
Have you seen this site? http://www.astrofaces.com/astrofaces/index.html
I found the link somewhere in this forum but I dont remember where. It may even be in this topic. It's interesting, exactly about astrology & appearance.
I think it could be reliable, if we knew what we were looking for.
I've been collecting images and data and organizing them according to their sidereal rising signs for a while now.
I believe that the rising sign does impart a kind of physical character. I also believe that the particular placement of the ascendant ruler also gives rise to a particular look.
My notion is that you have a kind of major type (sign rising), and then a sub type (rising sign ruler condition), and both modified by aspects, probably... something I need a lot more data to check out properly.
I'm sure someone could do this stuff with a lot more efficiency.
Here's a section from sidereal Pisces rising;
http://regulus-astrology.com/pdf/WP..._the_Leo_Rising_Decan_20110718uly_18_2011.pdf
there's a study done on ascendants. it suggests there is correlation between how someone looks and what sign/s their ascendant ruler/s is/are placed in
Interesting. Carter, Ma, and Kashkari definitely fit the Pisces Rising appearance profile. I'd argue that Armstrong & Sutton don't, but that could be weight issues throwing things off. A longish-looking face might've been more apparent in their youth, before the weight gain. However, Armstrong does have the bulging eyes that Kannon mentioned at the beginning of this thread as a Pisces Rising trademark. For the most part, the Pisces Rising theory is holding up across race.
Last edited:
Moog
Well-known member
There are a lot of possibilites. That's the thing about astrology. It's very complex.
I believe it's possible to unravel the complexities, given enough time and study.
Thank you. Yes, I have seen that in the past, I applaud the makers of that site.
However, I need to do things differently.
Love2Know
Well-known member
You're the one who wants to touch him even though you barely know him.
I don't understand ur point
Moog
Well-known member
I'd argue that Armstrong & Sutton don't, but that could be weight issues throwing things off. A longish-looking face might've been more apparent in their youth, before the weight gain. However, Armstrong does have the bulging eyes that Kannon mentioned at the beginning of this thread as a Pisces Rising trademark. For the most part, the Pisces Rising theory is holding up across race.
Yes, it's very difficult. Among the problems I've found are:
1. People can look very different at different times of their lives, particularly if they gain or lose a lot of weight.
2. It's hard to find uniformly shot images. I've done my best to try to find images taken from a 'frontal' position with the head basically straight and upright. The more photographed a person, the more choice of shots.
3. Not only can the angle of the photography cause problems, but the lighting can throw everything out too.
4. Celebs particularly have the wherewithal to surgically alter themselves, and often do, which can throw things for a loop. Noses particularly; very popular cosmetic procedure. Also things like hair colouring, or even excessive eyebrow shaping.
Cypocryphy
Well-known member
I don't know if they are wide or not. They look pretty normal to me. You have beautiful eyes. I love the teardrop shape. They would be great to draw/paint. What program are you using on the iPad? It looks like "Inspire Pro."