252
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/...ch-video24-discrepancies-that-thrill-hoaxers/
By Wolfgang Eggert for VT
transl. by laura kölsch
What we know
- The official offender
Brenton Tarrant. This unemployed man has travelled exciting crisis areas halfway around the world in recent years, allegedly radicalizing himself to the far right. Whether this happened in North Korea or in the Balkans, in Israel, in Turkey, in Iran, in Afghanistan or China’s civil war region Xinjiang is not explained. In Pakistan, where the alleged racist and Islam-hater also stayed near the embattled Kashmir area https://www.thequint.com/news/world/new-zealand-christchurch-terrorist-leaves-behind-seventy-four-page-manifesto-calling-indian-chinese-turkish-invaders
only 5 months before the gunshots of Christchurch, he seems to have felt totally at ease. In a Facebook post he praises the inhabitants and indirectly also the government of the Muslim country.
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bHWRRK11K3Q/XIukidAeZ1I/AAAAAAAAqdg/syqaqKCyHD4MRJM71fSUFjZQV9pWuCMuQCLcBGAs/s640/Brenton%2BTarrant%2B2.png
That is the vita, the official vita, which seemed “complete” until a few weeks ago.
By now we know that Tarrant was a member of the right-wing Knights Templar Order, which, among others, has the goal to “infiltrate Islamist groups to report their terrorist plans to the authorities”
https://www.zeit.de/2012/21/DOS-Breivik/seite-3.
How is it that one thinks of intelligence work looking at this vita?
- Radicalization in front of everyone’s eyes
Now there are rules with most secret services: the employees are meant to investigate, and may behave appropriate to the investigated milieu. “Heil Hitler” and Nazi gestures (not yet reported by Tarrant) are allowed, expressing extremist views, as well. The execution of terrorist attacks, however, does not belong in the work spectrum. But right here Tarrant seems to have “ended up”. Apparently he recently attracted attention with wild propaganda on the Internet – and should then have resorted to arms. This last stage of life must not be fact based, it could also be
ascribed to him, by others.
Anyone who deals in detail with intelligence services, will find a very popular “trick” to manifest a desired political narrative on the one hand and to prevent, on the other hand, clarifications by police and media: the planting of enemy agents or liaisons in dirty events.
/* dynamic basic css */ .GS_8.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {margin:0;padding:0;} .GS_8.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container .ob-clearfix {display:block;width:100%;float:none;clear:both;height:0px;line-
Various terror incidents raise the suspicion of such a method:
- Berlin, Christmass market attack, 2016: Documents from suspected german “Verfassungsschutz”-agent Anis Amri were found in the driver cabin; he was shot before he could testify about his previous life.
- Munich, killing spree, 2016: Shortly before the attack Daoud Sonboly, who, as media reported, voluntarily trained on the weapon in Iran, or someone else under his name, bought weapons on the internet. Sonboly was shot.
- Germany, NSU-case: Uwe Mundlos and Uwe Böhnhardt who in 1998 went underground with the help of German secret services who also supported them financially whilst in hiding, were, in 2011, found shot dead after authorities were seeking culprits in a series of murders within the drug/weapons/money laundering scene. As their last act they supposedly sent videos of confession.
- Kennedy murder: Alleged killer Lee Harvey Oswald, who spent a lot of time in the CIA environment, was shot. Afterwards, a photograph appeared showing the sniper with his murder weapon in his proud arm. It is fake.
Each of these men pertinently documented his dangerous intentions. Or
got them documented. Tarrant fits in. Supposedly he has been arrested. The pictures showing “him” in court are pixelated.
- The training
If you want to compare Brenton Tarrant with a terrorist ‘predecessor’ then Anders Behring Breivik is most obvious. In his “manifest” Tarrant refers to the Swede, who is said to have bombed half of Oslo’s government district into rubble and then slaughtered several dozen members of a youth camp.
Tarrant, like Breivik, visited a radical Templar order. Pictures of Tarrant – like those of Breivik – are for the most part edited. And his “massacre of Christchurch” ran completely parallel to an anti-terrorist police training, same place, same day – as it was the case with Breivik’s bloody special mission.
As luck would have it, this interaction too is a specialty evil tongues associate with intelligence services: to counteract anti-terrorist exercises by infiltrating own agents as perpetrators into foreign training, to then leave the responsibility or at least the bad after taste to the authorities of the “host” country.
Some examples:
- Norway, July 22, 2011: The terrorist attacks attributed to Breivik were a direct continuation of an official terrorist exercise with almost identical content compared to what happened in reality. Over the previous four days, and on this fateful Friday, the Norwegian anti-terrorist forces trained how to deal with a “mobile” terrorist attack, in which “one or more terrorists target to kill as many civilians as possible and attack the police upon their arrival”. The exercise was completed at 3 pm. At 3:26 pm the bomb exploded in Oslo’s government district.
- Paris, November 13, 2015: The terrorist acts, i.a. against Bataclan nightclub, were coordinated attacks in five different locations in Paris’ 10th and 11th arrondissement as well as in three locations in the suburb of Saint-Denis. On this very day, medical emergency services, police and fire departments in Paris trained responses to attacks by an “armed group in several parts of the city”.
- On September 11, 2001, US Air Defense was “otherwise employed”. In Canada, the “Global Guardian” exercise addressed military response to hijacked civilian aircrafts. And in the US, the “Vigilant Guardian” trained via computer-simulation the reaction to hijacked civilian aircrafts and as well testing readiness in case the World Trade Center was hit by those planes. Osama bin Laden, who is regarded as the brain of the real-time incident, has been in close contact with the CIA since the late 1970s until months before the attacks. http://img.over-blog-kiwi.com/0/78/07/19/20150908/ob_02bb38_benladen-cia-figaro.jpg http://www.mai68.org/ag/331.htm https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/nov/01/afghanistan.terrorism
- The July 7, 2005 bombings of London’s public transport: Ex-Scotland Yard anti-terrorist expert Peter Power, later director of one of Britain’s largest crisis-training groups, held an exercise during the very hour of the real bomb attacks. Training topic was the emergency response to bombings in exactly the same underground stations, where they exploded in reality. The later identified – and disappeared – “perpetrators” all had connections to British intelligence. Whether they were at all present at the crime scene remains unproven, since the only published pictures showing them together on that day (at a subway station) were computer-edited.
As already mentioned, a reality-based anti-terrorism exercise also took place in Christchurch on the very day of the drama, topic: how to deal with armed offenders.
https://m.focus.de/politik/ausland/terroranschlag-in-neuseeland-sie-rammten-sein-fahrzeug-so-stoppen-zwei-polizisten-den-attentaeter_id_10464998.html
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12213551
Members of these training forces, not ordinary police, secured, possibly according to the training script, “explosives” in several cars, including the vehicle of the mosque shooter.
Commissioner Bush, 3 hours after the attacks:”several IEDs attached to cars have been made safe now.” “This speaks to the seriousness of what occurred.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2019/mar/15/christchurch-shooting-injuries-reported-as-police-respond-to-critical-incident-live?page=with:block-5c8b2bbee4b016d23425c3c5#liveblog-navigation
And it was them who arrested Tarrant. There is a video showing the “arrest”. The professional action – the car was rammed – may indicate that the “arrest” was part of the ongoing training.
Considering Tarrants vita, which suggests anti-terrorist activities, the headline could read: How special forces correctly retire a colleague. In fact, the New Zealand Herald reports that Australian snipers participated in this or an accompanying exercise and were also seen near the crime scenes.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz//nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12213956&ref=clavis
If Tarrant was part of it, that would explain how he managed to bring his weapons into the country. But how did he get out of control? Or: Did he at all? All that is still in the dark. The police authorities withhold information. According to media reports, the arresting staff of the exercise forces are just beginning their annual leave and, of course, their names are kept secret. And: the pixelated face of the arrested shown in court raises the question of whether it even IS the Australian at all.
The appearance of the unknown – most of him is indeed unknown – is yet to come, allegedly he has renounced a defender.
For the time being safe answers for the interested audience can only be taken from the shooting video at Al Noor Mosque. However it’s hard to get hold of it. It is guarded like a state secret.
- The suppression of the “evidence video”
Tarrant’s video, still to find HERE
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=WO4NOH7OD8Y2 (New Zealand Mosque Shooting Uncensored)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ik6VYAJGF7os/ https://videos.files.wordpress.com/AHg7RSw6/new-zealander-shoots-up-mosque-march-15th-2019-1_hd.mp4
has been “classified by the Chief Censor’s Office as objectionable,” under a 1993 New Zealand law, which allows convictions up to 10 years of prison for downloading and/or distributing incriminating films. New Zealand Police have also been searching personal data of users who even controversially discuss Tarrant’s ‘manifesto’ or video.
https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/new-zealand-police-request-personal-data-from-kiwifarms-users-who-shared-shooter-manifesto-video/80039/
These censorship measures took over the entire world network within hours and subsequently made it impossible for non-New Zealanders to form an opinion on the video.
Remarkably, such measures have NOT been applied to the much crueller ISIS videos, which show beheadings, drownings, and burns alive. The relevant “Charlie Hebdo videos” are still available on the internet.
Why this time is different, so say the Hoaxer, has its reason in numerous vulnerabilities of the Christchurch perpetrator’s video.
And they have more than a few arguments on their side.
What the video shows
- The navigation -16.10 (0.43) Logic-Fail
The “shooter” who reportedly prepared for this crime for 2 years uses his car navigation on the way to Al Noor Mosque, but does not use it on his – more stressful – way to Linwood Mosque.
- The „perpetrators“ selfie -13.46 (3.09) Tech-Fail
The driver intentionally swings the camera over to his face at one point, allowing to ‘recognize’ him. It’s the only ‘evidence picture’ because there is no surveillance camera footage of the attacked mosques. The mask-like face seen in the car video may well be that of today’s “offender” Brenton Tarrant. But it looks like it has been cut out and does not fit in with the body, or -the stills show it particularly clear – the body seems too far behind the head. Post production comes into mind.
https://s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/images.deccanchronicle.com/dc-Cover-m482e2r1n2tei6lsvek9ovrvb3-20190315141031.Medi.jpeg
https://moderndiplomacy.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Brenton-Tarrant.jpg https://fijisun.com.fj/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Brenton-Tarrant-750×403.jpg
- The blind „eyewitnesses“ -10.28 (6.25) Basis-Video vs Endproduct
The “shooter” walks past two people in front of the gate of Al-Noor mosque. They are not surprised by the helmeted, camouflaged and armed passerby, who in turn ignores both “witnesses”
7b To counter the impression, that the guns might have been “invisible”, when the film was made, we have an eyewitness. The msn-article reads as followed:
Mohamed Yama was praying in the Al Noor mosque having the closest of escapes after bravely confronting the gunman. “I am shocked,” he said.
“I say hey. What are you doing? What’s the gun? This is a mosque.”
Mr Yama then recounts the moment the gunman turned to him and fired miraculously missing him by the slimmest of margins.
As worshippers tried to escape, Mohamed fled onto the street calling ambulances. https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/stories-of-survival-and-loss-after-the-christchurch-terror-attack/ar-BBUQkHe https://www.9news.com.au/national/news-melbourne-stories-of-survival-from-christchurch-terror-attack/e69bd4b2-17f8-4f26-ade5-e475448a30e4
BUT: We don´t find this “occurence” on “tarrant´s film” – it is neither to be seen nor to be heard there.
HERE
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=1XMGXKR2W7WU (0:37) we see and hear a second Mohamed Yama, another man under the same name who recounts the same incident. Watch “Tarrant´s film”, when he passes the cars, that this man is talking about. There is no voice to be heard by someone speaking to him in this area. And there is not the slightest reaction by the film-maker, that he might had been touched from behind. Besides the man recounts a false position of the film-camera. He points to his upper breast, instead of the head.
- The aggressor greeted like a friend -10.19 (6.36) Basic vs Finished Product
This obvious discrepancy continues at the entrance gate to the mosque, where the “perpetrator” points his gun at people standing at the door while these first “victims” greet him with the words “hello brother” which is common among Muslims.
- No weapon recoil -10.18 (6.37ff) Tech-Logic-Fail
The “shooting” starts at the mosque gate. The tremble-free video does not show any weapon recoil which gives rise to the assumption that the filming person was unarmed. For comparison, see 3.00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=134&v=ItILe1yWvZ8
- 52 shots from a 30 shots magazine -10.11 (6.44ff) Tech-Logic-Fail
After the entry scenario (9 shots) the “shooter” drops the weapon and changes to his second rifle. Here the shot sequence: Creeping: 3 shots; side room: 4 shots; forward in the hallway: 4 shots; entrance to the prayer room (crawling and second body): 9 shots; on group right in the room: approx. 24 shots; on approaching person: 5 shots plus 3 on the ground. That makes – with a 30 shots magazine! – about 52 shots without apparent magazine change.
- Why is no one escaping? -9.59 (6.57) Logic-Fail
When the shooter first enters the prayer room, he spares the group already crammed into the left corner. At -9.49 (7.06) he is back in the corridor, where he reloads –9.41 (7.14) and then goes back to the prayer room and only now, -9.36 (7.19) shoots at the body pile on the left. They had until then been able to escape to the garden through a glass door just two steps away, but with one exception – -9.36 (7.19) no one did.
- No room damage Tech-Logic-Fail
In the same scene the “perpetrator” fires with high salvo density especially at the right side of the room. It is completely inexplicable why the walls and windows show no ammunition effects.
- Barefoot “victim” in socks -8.13 (8.42) Different takes within filmmaking
A „victim“, which at the beginning crawls barefoot on the hallway’s floor, -10,06(6.47) wears blue socks in a later camera shot.
http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1553029204727.webm
- Water without rain -7.58 (8.55) Different takes within filmmaking
The “shooter” leaves the mosque and takes to the streets. At the entrance to the mosque there is a large water mark, which according to the video time code two and a half minutes before -10.27 (6.27) was still considerably smaller or narrower. In the short meantime – a cone locking the exit underlines this – no cars can have come out. This is an indication a prolonged stage setting, disguised by a hidden camera cut.
- Senseless shooting & cool vehicles -7.58 (8.57ff) Basic vs Finished Product
If the scenic routes “sidewalk/street/side road” were pre-recorded like all tracking shots in the open air, then there was some action required to put on top the pre-recorded material. The senseless shooting on the streets when no one was around, appear suitable for such a use. Strikingly, the car traffic on the road continues undisturbed!
- Dissolving cartridges -7.58 (8.57ff) Tech-Logic-Fail
The phenomenon of the “phantom cartridges”, which has already been mentioned in 15, is particularly clearly confirmed when the shooter takes the street in front of the mosque under “fire”. Here you can see the ejection of the cartridge cases – which, however, a thing of impossibility, DISSOLVE in the air! The few cartridges that seem to reach the ground without the typical clanking noise magically disappear within seconds.
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=W9956S2AYY9H
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpdRzQZAGxw
The Mueller investigation which ended recently with a “whimper,” in fact never existed at all nor should it have. As a subject of that investigation, I got a first-hand look. My personal involvement with a Russian/American veterans’ organization, my extensive writing in Russia and work on documentaries there, and my open support of Russian involvement in Syria made me a target.
My 40 years working in operational intelligence made me a source, eventually. I can now make clear what I told the FBI, “Russia didn’t do it.”
By 2015 broad interference was recognized, a clear effort to rig America’s presidential election was detected, not by journalists but by retired intelligence officers from the US military, the CIA and other organizations.
A report was written and presented to Washington’s political leaders by attorney and Veterans Today editor Thomas Mattingly, a Washington attorney who had worked with activist Ralph Nader much of his career. Here were the findings, from 2015:
- Social media manipulation, led by clearly defined efforts coming from the highest levels of Google and Facebook, working with Israeli based intelligence contractors, is creating a basis for covering electronic vote rigging and illegal voter suppression efforts.
- The candidate that will “rise to the top” will be controlled by not the Israeli government but an organized crime cartel as was explained in the Damascus Security Conference in December 2014 by Gordon Duff and Colonel James Hanke.
- An action plan was outlined citing an unprecedented national security crisis. Instead, those who received the report, which carried recommendations from a former director of the CIA and several other retired agency heads, broke off communications.
By late 2017, Thomas Mattingly was dead, mysterious circumstances, and others who worked on this report were targeted by the Department of Homeland Security, detained, interrogated, computers and phones hacked, warned off by security officials. None took the warning.
Prefacing what will appear as a journal article that might appear to some as op-ed, is necessary. Opinions are like human orifices, everyone has one and many if perhaps most are best kept to one’s self. Too many opinions are floating around and too little fact. To be painfully explicit, fabricating and manipulating opinion is a $250 billion-dollar industry today, managing mankind like cattle.
At one time, few would understand high this can go, but with devices put into children’s hands not long after birth and a profile of every thought and feeling being continually elicited, catalogued, analyzed and custom crafted, fully targeted false narrative, citing dreams, hopes, fears but most of all, vulnerabilities. What can we call it, this “Russiagate” thing?
I think we can, finally, use the term that has always been floating around, that is “cover and deception operation.” Russiagate was – and it is absolutely over – a fabrication, a construct, intended to provide public theatre, while not just simple crimes such as widespread public corruption went on but more, while overt acts of brutal insanity went unanswered.
Robert Mueller
We begin our story looking at former FBI Director Robert Mueller. Mueller is a former US Marine, a veteran of Vietnam where he served as an officer. In some nation’s military circles, this might represent something special. Here, however, we will note Donald Trump’s hatred of former US Senator and former Vietnam POW, John McCain.
Trump had been provided briefing material on McCain, showing his behavior as a POW to have been far from exemplary. His POW commanding officer, Air Force Colonel Ted Guy, one of the founders of Veterans Today, had recommended McCain for court martial after his release, one of 33 POWs charged with collusion with the enemy.
McCain was charged with making 32 propaganda broadcasts and in aiding North Vietnam in placing their air defenses in such a manner as to maximize American losses. According to US Army Colonel Earl Hopper and Marine Sergeant Major John Holland, all now dead just like McCain, pilot then prisoner-of-war McCain was personally responsible for downing 60 American pilots.
This and more is scrubbed from history, though I knew both McCain’s accusers personally. More telling is McCain’s history fighting efforts to look for missing POWs.
https://youtu.be/4Zt5S9DN3Bk
https://youtu.be/zi8yxilYPzQ
https://youtu.be/x0CfAh2PJ6k
According to VT Editor Colonel James Hanke, once head of America’s POW recovery efforts based in Thailand, America abandoned hundreds of POW’s left behind, largely based on efforts of John McCain to classify sightings and block recovery efforts.
Why are we telling this story? The answer is simple, a military background during Vietnam is not a reliable indicator of anything, a war where Medals of Honor were handed out to the undeserving and where America’s poor fought and died, while military brass lived in debauched comfort in luxurious rear bases. As an NCO serving with a combat unit in Vietnam, I went months without even knowing the name of my commanding officer. They came and went and, often as not, we never saw them.
I am not saying this was Robert Mueller; but any American who served in Vietnam and who didn’t return to the US and oppose the most filthy and corrupt war in human history is not a hero under any imaginable circumstances, but is far closer to a Nazi concentration camp guard. This is opinion, one earned and given.
Mueller first came to our attention when he became FBI Director, one week before the 9/11 attack. Two very curious appointments took place during those days, the second being General Richard Myers as Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Our sources, some at the FBI itself, identify Mueller as leading a coverup of the real events behind 9/11, which, according to a report presented to President Donald Trump by former CIA agent Robert David Steele, named high level members of America’s government with broad complicity in both Israel and Saudi Arabia, as the real perpetrators. Trump has twice, thus far, promised to release this information to the public, but has failed to do so as of this writing.
Mueller was named in a Federal lawsuit filed by former FBI agent and US Army Colonel, Mike Dick, as being complicit in a murder attempt on him, as he was the agent who had led the initial FBI investigation of 9/11.
We again run into Mueller in 2005 with the arrest of former Congressman Mark Siljander on 15 counts of aiding terrorism. Siljander served as UN Ambassador under President Reagan and is a lifelong friend. Siljander also leads the National Prayer Breakfast, Washington’s most powerful “insider” organization.
While working on Siljander’s defense team with a former Secretary of State and former US Attorney General, we ran across widespread corruption within the FBI and Department of Justice. Mueller led the FBI, while the DOJ was under former Senator John Ashcroft, a longtime friend of Siljander’s. The investigation against Siljander, which came not long after Siljander approached President Bush (43) outlining the fake intelligence that led to the US invasion of Iraq, was begun by a regional US Attorney who was the son-in-law of General Richard Myer, the man who many believe ordered the air defense “stand down” that allowed the 9/11 attacks.
After years of legal battles, Siljander accepted a plea for “obstruction of justice” and, curiously, contracted a strange and improbable form of cancer during his short incarceration. Against all imaginable odds, Mark Siljander survived. The obstruction case against Siljander was based on witness testimony that contradicted statements Siljander made to the FBI. The Federal “witness” was given the choice of testify against Siljander or endless incarceration at the US facility at Guantanamo. This was Robert Mueller in action.
Were one to assume, as so many now are considering, that the Muller investigation was fake from the beginning and that Mueller’s personal history of “moral relativity” made him a perfect choice to manage a fake investigation that used up two years while the world burned, who do we blame?
We also ask the same questions, qui bono? Who benefits? While Mueller “fiddled,” Trump bombed Syria twice, the US led mass attacks on Yemen, secretly opened wars in Somalia and across North Africa and began deploying advanced missile systems on Russia’s borders.
America was already out of the Geneva Convention, a necessary move on behalf of Bush (43) to support Israel’s illegal occupation of Golan, the West Bank and Jerusalem (al Quds.) The US had also left the International Criminal Court, as so many Americans now faced war crimes tribunals for military actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, perhaps the Balkans as well.
However, things went further, so much further. Today, ICC judges and prosecutors face assassination or imprisonment based on threats made by former CIA Director Pompeo, now US Secretary of State. While Mueller “fiddled,” the US dropped out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and renewed sanctions against Iran. The US even withdrew from the United Nations Human Rights Council.
Back at home, the economy has turned around, a nation that was eliminating its debt under President Obama is now running yearly trillion-dollar deficits, while the wealthiest Americans pay little or no taxes.
So, we ask, why was Mueller picked? Is our analysis correct? Was it wrong for many to assume that Mueller would want his last public act to be one of honor?
We know this, that early on, the Mueller investigators traced “Russian interference” to its real root, the Israel lobby in Washington. Increasingly, the Democratic Party is split over backing Israel. The issue has nothing to do with the Middle East, with America’s violations of international law in moving their embassy to Jerusalem (al Quds) or in recognizing Syria’s Golan as Israeli territory.
Do note, that in accordance with newly enacted Israeli laws, the residents of Gaza can never be Israeli citizens because they were not “born Jews.”
Israel’s “Jewish Nation State” law permanently denies even the limited protections of “second class citizenship” to Christians and Muslims living in Israel and the Occupied Territories (as defined by the UNSC).
Muller released his report, which failed to follow up on the real results of the investigation, broad vote rigging and campaign finance violations, all of which led directly to the Israel lobby, the Directors of AIPAC themselves and other organizations. All was “misplaced and forgotten”, including 70 plus “sealed indictments” based on evidence and testimony long reported over the two-years suddenly erased from history.
The result of this “fiddling?” Every form of warfare known to mankind and some previously unimagined were waged with unprecedented brutality. Nation after nation is reeling in confusion, watching America “gone wild,” a nation led by the debauched. No one is safe.
Is it Mueller’s fault? We don’t know. We will never know – this is how Washington works. I have, over the years, spoken to so many, heard their excuses, why they went along with corrupt practices, why they took money.
They all say the same thing. “When I get enough to keep my family comfortable, when I get in power, then ‘they’ will see, I will arise like a ‘lion’ and fight for decency and honor.”
But then, no one has ever gotten “enough.” That day of “decency and honor” never seems to come. You see, everyone has a price. This is the “why” of Google, of Facebook, of Black Cube and its endless clones, to find that price and who is worth buying. Honor, we learn, is sold quite cheaply nowadays.