Donald Trump will be impeached.

david starling

Well-known member
give-bees-a-chance-logo.png

With the Trumpolluter out of office, bees may have a chance. But, there's a Democrat as chairman of the House Agricultural Committee, Collin Peterson, who's in the pocket of the pesticide maker, Bayer.
 

piercethevale

Well-known member
With the Trumpolluter out of office, bees may have a chance. But, there's a Democrat as chairman of the House Agricultural Committee, Collin Peterson, who's in the pocket of the pesticide maker, Bayer.

Yes, Monsanto and Bayer are now one and have the patent, the control of, something around 90% of the worlds present seed stock.:crying:
Be afraid, very afraid.
 

piercethevale

Well-known member

Of course she must go ahead with it... to admit defeat now will leave the Democrats with a lot of egg on their faces... yet, that is an inevitability she's just going to have to deal with sooner or later and the longer this gets dragged out the more egg, the more damage to the Democratic Party.

It's like watching Kowalski at the end of the movie "Vanishing Point", He knew what awaited him. yet he tromped on that accelerator anyways.

tenor-1.gif
 

piercethevale

Well-known member
"Trumped-up charges"? :lol:

Btw, He lost the Popular vote by a substantial margin.

Yes, and thank God the framers of the Constitution created the electoral college.

...although you do know that they tried to prove voter fraud against Trump but dropped the investigation when they found that the fraud was overwhelmingly Clinton's
 

david starling

Well-known member
Yes, and thank God the framers of the Constitution created the electoral college.

...although you do know that they tried to prove voter fraud against Trump but dropped the investigation when they found that the fraud was overwhelmingly Clinton's

You know the Electoral College was created to preserve the institution of Slavery, right? And, it worked until Lincoln campaigned on a platform of allowing slavery to remain in States that still had it, but any new territories would become Free-states, by Federal law. Ironically, Lincoln probably wouldn't have won, if the Southern States hadn't already begun seceding from the Union.

Consider this: In ALL the Presidential elections since 1824, there have been ONLY 4(!) when the Electoral College winner lost the Popular vote. In 2000, Bush Jr. actually lost both, but the final recount in Florida showing that Gore had won the Popular vote in Florida was too late--ALL the Electoral votes had already gone to Bush, and no do-over was possible.

Something's clearly wrong when the Popular vote doesn't match up with the Electoral vote. The well-proven and undisputed Russian interference (not "collusion") brilliantly targeted the swing-States that would decide the Electoral College winner.

If you vote for the Republican Presidential candidate in California, it doesn't matter, because all the Electoral votes will go to the Democratic nominee. Same thing in reverse, if you vote in Texas. Something is clearly wrong with this process, with no way to make it right.
 
Last edited:

piercethevale

Well-known member
You know the Electoral College was created to preserve the institution of Slavery, right? And, it worked until Lincoln campaigned on a platform of allowing slavery to remain in States that still had it, but any new territories would become Free-states, by Federal law. Ironically, Lincoln probably wouldn't have won, if the Southern States hadn't already begun seceding from the Union.

Consider this: In ALL the Presidential elections since 1824, there have been ONLY 4(!) when the Electoral College winner lost the Popular vote. In 2000, Bush Jr. actually lost both, but the final recount in Florida showing that Gore had won the Popular vote in Florida was too late--ALL the Electoral votes had already gone to Bush, and no do-over was possible.

Something's clearly wrong when the Popular vote doesn't match up with the Electoral vote. The well-proven and undisputed Russian interference (not "collusion") brilliantly targeted the swing-States that would decide the Electoral College winner.

If you vote for the Republican Presidential candidate in California, it doesn't matter, because all the Electoral votes will go to the Democratic nominee. Same thing in reverse, if you vote in Texas. Something is clearly wrong with this process, with no way to make it right.

No, David, it was created to protect States rights, Otherwise the City of Los Angeles would have made Hilary president. Look at a map of the voting results. In terms of territory the country overwhelmingly voted for Trump.
It is the States that vote for a president, and the States are told how to vote by their populace.
We are a republic, a union of States, not a democracy of the people. That's what the framers of the Constitution intended.
As great a man as Lincoln might have been, he violated the Constitution by going to war with the South.

Did you know that Texas was never ratified as a State and that Texas included a provision in their agreement to join the Union if they be allowed to leave the Union at anytime, for any reason they found fit?
It's true. ...and, technically, Texas is another nation that the United States invaded and still occupies to this day.
As of the 2000 census 75% of the "white" population of Texas had at least one ancestor that fought for the Confederacy. ...and that's why you don't want to "mess with Texas". By that I mean, if you say the wrong thing there while you're in the wrong group of people, you'll get your a$$ kicked.
My great, great, grandfather fought for the Confederacy. He was born in Missouri, his son was born in Texas.
 

piercethevale

Well-known member

Nothing wrong with those two that a little more fiber in their diet wouldn't fix...along with immediate retirement.

...If you really want to talk about nut jobs in Gov't from California,

Well, actually there's a lot of them, but I'm referring to those in D.C., r.e. Feinstein, whom wanted all veterans of the military to have their second amendment rights revoked for the rest of their lives. ...and Kamala Harris, whom claims to be "all about the taxpayer" and insists on flying first class and staying in five star hotels, paid for by us taxpayers, whenever she's traveling.

BTW, my room mate informed me that the Clinton's are presently worth around 330 million $$$s,
I'm so happy to learn that they landed on their feet...after being impoverished by Bill's selfless discharge of his... uh...
...his...uh...
Bills selfless two terms he gave to...uh
...ummm...
Those 8 years the two of them lived rent free at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

That must be an old meme you posted?
 

david starling

Well-known member
No, David, it was created to protect States rights, Otherwise the City of Los Angeles would have made Hilary president. Look at a map of the voting results. In terms of territory the country overwhelmingly voted for Trump.
It is the States that vote for a president, and the States are told how to vote by their populace.
We are a republic, a union of States, not a democracy of the people. That's what the framers of the Constitution intended.
As great a man as Lincoln might have been, he violated the Constitution by going to war with the South.

Did you know that Texas was never ratified as a State and that Texas included a provision in their agreement to join the Union if they be allowed to leave the Union at anytime, for any reason they found fit?
It's true. ...and, technically, Texas is another nation that the United States invaded and still occupies to this day.
As of the 2000 census 75% of the "white" population of Texas had at least one ancestor that fought for the Confederacy. ...and that's why you don't want to "mess with Texas". By that I mean, if you say the wrong thing there while you're in the wrong group of people, you'll get your a$$ kicked.
My great, great, grandfather fought for the Confederacy. He was born in Missouri, his son was born in Texas.

Millions of voters in the red States voted for Hillary. But, when it came to electing the Commander in Chief, none of those votes counted. They were entirely disenfranchised, just like millions of Republican voters in the States that went blue.
 

david starling

Well-known member
Each State has its own Governor, Senators, and Congressional representatives. But, NOT its own President. The President represents ALL the people of the nation, and therefore ALL votes for President should go into the final tally.
 
Top