Love you, mama!
Loooooooool! You say it's "
commonly known" that the OUT vote is made by nationalist (not racist) people. I'd love to learn the source of this survey as I imagine it's speculative. I'd say the IN vote is revealing of the percentage of people who have been hypnotized by the campaigns to hide the truth and highlights the importance for those people to conduct independent source research, rather than basing their decisions on the steering by the propaganda because, guess what, it is biased. However, even if those OUT votes came from the benefits culture of the UK, who have no financial/political savvy, they made the right choice at the end of the day. I applaud them for taking the time to turn off Jeremy Kyle and step outside to do something productive for our financial and political system that gives their children hope for a future they would have had no chance of having if the UK remained in the EU.
It is unfortunate that some children in UK schools are being bullied on the basis of their birth country being outside of the UK but it is entirely illogical to pin this problem on the EU referendum since this problem has been around for decades and decades. It is also worthy to note this bullying problem is not present in the other countries which have opted OUT. For example, Norway, which has the lowest rate of school bullying in Europe and, what is more, this figure has not been affected by the decision to stay OUT. I moved to the UK from another country in the early 90's, when I was a child. I had no friends at school and I used to get beaten and fly-kicked on my way home from school for being foreign. Since the UK is stable in showing it has the highest rates of bullying in schools than anywhere else, throughout history, I'd say bullying is more of a social problem than it is a problem related, in any way, to EU exit.
Still, you are ignoring the real issue, the more pertinent issue, which is that economical refugees (i.e., people whose safety is not in danger) come through the EU door with an agenda to exploit the UK system for what it has to offer.
This is criminal. You see foreign women trying to make a buck. I see foreign women getting pregnant like it's going out of fashion so that their sprogs can have UK passports and bypass all the red-tape. The UK working class are footing the NHS bill for all these births and their subsequent health, educational and social needs through the taxes we pay, which are already incredibly high, as you note. The UK system is choking to sustain itself and yet, by EU laws, it's been having to splash out on child benefit for EU children, as well. Please note whereas social benefit is calculated for bare essentials, conversion rates mean one child benefit receipt is enough to buy half a house in Romania. The EU is forcing the UK to bleed money and you are supporting the process of the very result you are complaining against.
As to the finance, with all due respect, you are misinformed. Beware the balony you read in The Sun. The FTSE 100 is trading at the same level as January 2016 (see attachment). The market is simply adjusting. Yes, the adjustment will take a little time but not that much time, at all. A year, tops. And how much better is that than having to pay £350M per week to belong to the EU (around half of that is rebated). Per week. Per week. You simply need to do the calculation to understand that, in the long term, the UK is far better OUT. If you can't do the calculation, look at countries like Greece, Croatia, Italy who were relatively okay until they joined the EU and now they are on the poverty line or heading towards it. They've done the calculations. They want OUT. If the IN vote people do not believe numbers, or don't care about numbers, that is another issue. The most common argument seems to be focused on UK having foreign food and wine supply cut off. People who prioritize this nonsense can move to the EU.
The benefits of staying OUT include sustaining UK companies which make us healthier by locally grown, seasonal produce which are put of out business by silly EU laws which are concerned by ensuring all potatoes in a bag are the same size. Tons of potent healing herbs are forbidden from entering the UK by silly EU laws in favour of financing the pharmaceutical industry. Yuck. Yuck. Yuck. We'll go back to the old school, thank you very much, it worked just fine before and it can work just fine again.
Everyone crying on my facebook about the exit lists personal reasons for their upset. For example,
"This is how I feel and like Rebecca Buck, don't care who I offend. I've been sadder than I can ever remember over this referendum which should never have taken place. I'm embarrassed to call myself British. I'm very supportive of all my European friends and extended European family and I care about the future of young people all over Europe."
What the IN crowd fail to understand is that the EU bosses do not have personal reasons in mind when they designed the EU which was always a capitalist business decision. Politicians are not in the business of making anyone's dreams come true, but their own. They want money for a product we do not need. That is all. Why 48% of the UK want some Polish/German/French person we have never elected making key decisions to exploit our whole lives in favour of the making the wealthy richer and the poor poorer, and destroying long-term the economy we have, is completely beyond me. Having seen their arguments, I can only put it down to ignorance. The IN arguments are based on sheer deception and wishful thinking. The right, financially sound, decision has been made for the UK. I must say, I'm rather chuffed!
<3
Have a great day!
