Neither of those historical figures advocated for the confiscation of other person's goods or property, by the use of goverment force. So your comparison is wrong. Except for mother teresa of course, who was just a political puppet bent on money grabbing.
What they advocated is for charitable actions, which are choices people make on their own without the imposition of someone else or the state.
In any case then, would you be happy with a fascist style economy? Because it seemed like your massive response aimed to justify the clear similarity between Bernie and Mussolini economic plan as something which was good.
What Bernie is advocating, i.e. an end to endless wars and a reduction in military presence all over the globe, and if He does get elected then you'll have a lot less money taken "by force" than you are seeing taken presently....besides, even if the military was vastly reduced and we quit involving ourselves where we don't belong in the first place, what has the U.S. got to be afraid of? We have enough atomic weapons, and the missiles to launch them, to destroy the entire world at least five fold?
Maybe you like to see wealthy foreigners buying up as much American property as they can get their hands on?
The Japanese, as a single entity, now own more land in California than anyone else. They also own most of the natural springs that produce enough water so as to be bottled. The Chinese are buying up all the farmland in California that they can get.
foreign interests are buying up American businesses and industries left and right...and those corporations are considered to be "people" by the Supreme Court and make large political contributions>
Congress has even been selling off our natural resources to the highest bidders and it doesn't matter if if is within a national park, whether it is sacred land to the native Americans or even if it might be your ancestral burial ground.
The rental market in California has become so lucrative that foreign investment firms have been buying vast numbers of single family homes and apartment complexes and the first thing they do is raise the rent...not to mention that it also drives up the price of owning a home or even undeveloped property and high enough so as to be out of economic reach of most Americans.
Did you know that Bernie was buying up properties in Vermont when He was the Mayor of Burlington and then putting those properties in a community trust in order to keep them from the portfolios of investment firms hellbent on making money? Any resident can lease a home from that trust and keep that lease for as long as they live... and at a very affordable price.
Bernie believes that our homeland belongs to all Americans and homes and apartments shouldn't be income assets owned by foreign interests...and I might assume that you know that the charging of rent for a place to live is a form of "usury"...and Usury is considered to be a sin by God. [It's why Jesus/Yeshu'a didn't "turn his cheek" when He saw the money changers in the temple. That also was usury and that was also spiritual defilement. The whole thing about "turning the other cheek" is misunderstood by the great majority that have read, or heard, of the passage because one has to be familiar with the historiography of the time and region to know that what was being implicated was that to the Hebrews of that time a public slap in the face was the greatest insult and .display of contempt of them all and the courts were being tied up with such petty grievances. To "turn the other cheek" was meant to imply that one should get over it if they were the recipient of such a demonstration of contempt and denigration... rather than make a huge issue out of it which ultimately only increases ill feelings and more pointless acts.It is just a slap on the cheek, what amount of physical pain does that impart? God knows who is truly just and karma rectifies the matter. Let them even strike the other cheek and walk away to demonstrate your righteousness , let God be the judge of the matter and then let karma have its say.
The charging of rent, of interest, money changing for a fee, gambling, deliberate inflation and the devaluation of your money is also usury and every one of those activities are engaged in presently by OUR OWN GOVERNMENT... MEANING THAT, AS LONG AS YOU DO NOTHING TO TRY TO STOP IT YOU ARE JUST AS GUILTY OF THE SIN AS ANYONE ELSE.] This is a government of the people yet still... and there is no excuse for any of us as for it to continue on.
The federal government is supposed to be nothing more than a governing body of elected representatives for the fifty States and not a tangible territory within defined borders that it may call its property. They had to create a special law in order to allow the existence of the District of Columbia. By strict definition of the Constitution there should not be any "Federal Parks, B.L.M. controlled land, nor even Federal Penitentiaries, outside of one that could exist within the District of Columbia, that is.
While I'm rather pro border wall, myself... the fact is that the federal government has no authority to build such a thing as it isn't their land it is being built upon.
If you insist on continually supporting politicians that are nothing more than paid puppets of corporate interests then I suggest that you learn to speak Japanese, Chinese, French, Spanish, a number of the Dutch dialects, German, Hindi and Arabic for starters and be ready to surrender all firearms as that is one of their biggest agendas presently, i.e., the disarming of Americans...it makes those foreign investors very nervous that we are all armed and more willing to die on our feet rather than to live on our knees.
It scares off a great many potential investors. That's the reason there have been so many false flags these past few years. They can't sell off America with a possibility that its citizens will one day just stand up and demand it be returned and be well armed enough to make it an irrefutable demand
Once the second amendment is gutted...it's the end of this democratic republic.
I you don't think Bernie or Tulsi is the answer then support anyone else ...anyone at all... that isn't a paid lackey of the corporations or "in the back pocket" of the "2%"
As I was given to understand, there are presently four Americans that have more combined wealth than all the rest of us citizens of the United States combined.
As Dubya was heard to say; "Quit waving the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper" then know that is the prevailing attitude of the uber wealthy. Look at the huge number of corporations that get away without paying any income tax at years end. Then realize that a fair number of them are even getting subsidies paid for out of your pocket.
Read Smedley Butler's book "War Is A Racket", after you learn whom Smedley Butler was and how He tried to raise us above the madness.
The Democrats pushing for this impeachment are nothing but despicable cowards and, or, poseurs. If they had any b***s they would be investigating what really went down on September 11, 2001 [What really hit the Pentagon that day? ...and if any of you reply that it was "an airliner" you're either a fool or a shill posing as an astrologer here at this forum] and they would turn Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld over to the World Court for war crimes.
This "impeachment effort is nothing more than a sideshow meant to distract you and lull you into a false belief that they have your best interests at heart.
I have personally witnessed paid political shills invading forums such as like this one a few months before elections for the sole purpose that they are paid to do so and to dissuade, disrupt, denounce, and denigrate the other members that are politically aligned otherwise than that of their employers.
The "2%" can easily afford hundreds of them, yea even thousands of them.
Think for yourselves, if someone is posting what looks like and sounds like horse patootie, it most likely is just that.
A lot of people are going around saying that Trump isn't very intelligent, that as a businessman he has proven himself to be a complete failure as for being the reason that He made some bad investments. If that were all true then why is he still so freaking wealthy and that his wealth continued to grow right up to the time He took the oath of office?
Why? Because He is one hellova con man. Have any of you considered the possibility that is exactly what He is doing in Washington...conning the dickens out of the self serving, and corporate obeying, greed driven representatives by getting them to reveal themselves which is certainly how this "dog and pony act" that Congress is putting on appears as like to an unbiased outside observer.
With very few exceptions, the uber wealthy didn't get their wealth by engaging in fair business practices. Most of the time they did it by playing a con and the means by which they keep their wealth is ultimately dependent on it.
He may just be perpetuating the greatest political con game of all time...
It certainly seems to me to be one very effective means by which to "drain the swamp". Career politicians don't stand a chance of outwitting an experienced businessman whom is well educated in the means and ways of the con.
Think about it.
Bernie Sanders...or Tulsi ... in 2020, and if neither of them run...then vote Trump. .
...
BUT REALISTICALLY, [NOW, HERE COMES THE "REAL DEAL"...READY FOR IT?... NO, i DOUBT THAT ANY OF YOU ARE, SAVE BUT A SAVVY FEW] I sense that the "2%' is going to find some means by which to get Trump out and keep Bernie and Tulsi from the ballot. Mind you, I'm not saying that Trump will be convicted of anything or that He will resign...I'm just saying that "they" will become so desperate in the coming months that they may try just about anything to get Him out of the picture.
From what I've learned from the readings of Edgar Cayce pertaining to his predictions for the 21st century and that He pretty much said that another civil war, not one between the States, nor one arising from racial differences, nor one created by religious differences of beliefs, it will be a war between the haves and the have nots that will go down. Cayce said this in a manner of speaking that implied that it was almost a foregone inevitability and combined with what I've gathered so far from my astrological research for the coming decade... all this blather and bickering here in this forum over this matter of impeachment will amount to nothing more than a lot of useless blather and energy spent futilously
What does that ultimately tell us? The way that I see it, is that if someone like Bernie, or Tulsi, doesn't get elected in 2020 then you had all best start stocking up your larders, your emergency kits, even your ammunition, and be prepared to hunker down at a moments notice. That or move to the far extremes of Alaska, some desert isle, or hidden enclave high in the Rocky Mountains...is my advice.
Change is going to come [at this time and to the degree I have initially studied the Astrological indications, I believe it may begin by 2025] and there isn't anyone that will be able to stop it once it gets rolling. It will be far easier and can even be pleasant if We are in the drivers seat of that vehicle of change... otherwise it'll be as like a runaway train heading for a horrendous wreck.
May God protect the meek, the morally righteous, among us and may God save this nation.