Re: What Edgar Cayce said about Planets affecting us...and some observations & deduct
Yes, it would be aproximate. BUT we can not always just put Regulus at 0 Leo, because that would be the same method ... as I understand it we need to use the galactic center or galactic equator as the fixed point, since the fixed stars like Regulus and Spice are moving a little bit through the centuries.
This could mean that Regulus is not always at exact 0 degr Leo, but around that area though.
The way I understand it, Spica is also just an approximate for something else. I tried a lot of ayanamsas in the past but eventually went back to Lahiri. I've never tried an ayanamsa that far off though.
If we go with exact Regulus as exact 0 Leo, then for the year 2000, it would be 29degr49min47sec according to my software.
Yes, it would be aproximate. BUT we can not always just put Regulus at 0 Leo, because that would be the same method ... as I understand it we need to use the galactic center or galactic equator as the fixed point, since the fixed stars like Regulus and Spice are moving a little bit through the centuries.
This could mean that Regulus is not always at exact 0 degr Leo, but around that area though.