Aunt on Facebook

wan

Well-known member
Do you have the option of not mixing with anyone who isn't Asian?

If not, you're being forced to integrate. Do you have a problem with not having a choice?

I do. And what is your point? Not sure what you are trying to say.

I am a woman of principle. I am against forced integration because I find it to be fundamentally wrong. Doesn't matter if I personally benefit from it, which I do. I mean, I have full access to all nubile young hot white men.

And every benefit I mentioned is a benefit I personally have experienced, thanks to my parents' decision to raise me in a racially mixed and pretty well integrated city. They both grew up with Jim Crow segregation--which they, both being white, could be said to have benefitted from--but did NOT want that for their kids. And I understand why. But I do not understand why some white people think it's a travesty to have to breathe the same air as brown skinned folks.
"Breathe the same air as brown-skinned people"--you are trivializing the concerns of white people who do not wish to integrate. Not wanting to mix with black people is so much more than "not wanting to breathe the same air" as them.
 
Last edited:

david starling

Well-known member
No offence to you Osa but I am not going to refrain from saying what I want to say just because you "question the necessity" of it. I also do not care whether my point could be better made this way or that way. I have very distinct, rigidly held preferences and I am shameless about vocalizing them out loud.

I find all non-white races to be unattractive. Heck, I don't even like to talk to white girls. I just want to throw myself at the crotch of the nearest good-looking white man.



Yes forced segregation is bad. And so is forced integration. Do you agree that currently we have forced integration?

So few people have a real problem with it, it's considered the norm. And for those few who do have a real problem with it, they can always emigrate to a more homogeneous country of their liking.
 
Last edited:

david starling

Well-known member
Hey, I just checked, and Argentina is listed as one of the "whitest" countries on the planet! Now, if you can overcome your intolerance towards Leos, Dirius might help you emigrate to Argentina!
 

ynnest

Well-known member
Hello everyone,

Interesting discussion :smile:,

I believe generally speaking that people can use both non racist words and racist words for racists Purposes depending on the Intentions behind the words and where the person(s) is coming from which means that a person could theoretically be playing a false act/ pretending to be non racist Within a racist agenda which from my perspective empathizes the importance of judging the intentions behind the words of people and not just the words themselves:smile:,

Have a good evening everyone :smile:.


Y
 

wan

Well-known member
Hey, I just checked, and Argentina is listed as one of the "whitest" countries on the planet! Now, if you can overcome your intolerance towards Leos, Dirius might help you emigrate to Argentina!

No thanks. I have a huge preference for Canadian guys (another preference of mine. Are you going to call me racist for this as well?). Love their pure Canadian accents. Although being nearer to Dirius' crotch does sound very alluring.
 

david starling

Well-known member
I do. And what is your point? Not sure what you are trying to say.

I am a woman of principle. I am against forced integration because I find it to be fundamentally wrong. Doesn't matter if I personally benefit from it, which I do. I mean, I have full access to all nubile young hot white men.


"Breathe the same air as brown-skinned people"--you are trivializing the concerns of white people who do not wish to integrate. Not wanting to mix with black people is so much more than "not wanting to breathe the same air" as them.

I thought it was just about your own, personal aesthetics. Just going to school, working, shopping, or dining out in integrated places isn't like having to date someone you don't find attractive.
 

wan

Well-known member
So few people have a real problem with it, it's considered the norm. And for those few who do have a real problem with it, they can always emigrate to a more homogeneous country of their liking.

Oh, so suggesting black people to emigrate is racist but suggesting this to white people isn't? Talk about double standards.
 

david starling

Well-known member
Hello everyone,

Interesting discussion :smile:,

I believe generally speaking that people can use both non racist words and racist words for racists Purposes depending on the Intentions behind the words and where the person(s) is coming from which means that a person could theoretically be playing a false act/ pretending to be non racist Within a racist agenda which from my perspective empathizes the importance of judging the intentions behind the words of people and not just the words themselves:smile:,

Have a good evening everyone :smile:.

Y

Actions speak louder than words, although speaking out is also an action.
 

wan

Well-known member
I thought it was just about your own, personal aesthetics. Just going to school, working, shopping, or dining out in integrated places isn't like having to date someone you don't find attractive.

Why is it OK to force white people to go to school, work, shop, or dine out with black people?
 

aquarius7000

Well-known member
How is changing the racial attitudes of white Americans an improvement? Yes it would improve the circumstances for black people but what do white people have to gain from it?

America is not just about "white people". I know you didn't say so in exactly so many words. White people themselves are immigrants. So why just think about "what will white people gain from it"?

The real question is - What does American Society gain from it?

All those that love America would want a congenial, tolerant, equal opportunity for all and a safe society.

THAT requires change in racial attitudes because what racism/ racist attitudes have done to America is right before our eyes. So the question would then be, those that still want to continue with racism and not wish to emigrate to somewhere else, do they really care for/ love America?
 

aquarius7000

Well-known member
Words don't come out of a vacuum. Words reflect one's thoughts and intent. :)

This is not to say that words cannot be misinterpreted, but, if not immediately, after a while (here, after a no. posts) there is little room for misinterpretation. Unless somebody is hell bent upon misinterpreting to serve a particular purpose.

Hello everyone,

Interesting discussion :smile:,

I believe generally speaking that people can use both non racist words and racist words for racists Purposes depending on the Intentions behind the words and where the person(s) is coming from which means that a person could theoretically be playing a false act/ pretending to be non racist Within a racist agenda which from my perspective empathizes the importance of judging the intentions behind the words of people and not just the words themselves:smile:,

Have a good evening everyone :smile:.


Y
 

wan

Well-known member
They can just home school their kids and work and shop on line. There's no one forcing anyone to mix with other races, ethnic groups, or genders.

Not sure if that's true or not. Last time I checked, the kind of integration you have in the States is mandatory.

And why should people have to home-school their children, or work and shop online? Wouldn't it be easier to make it so that they can freely choose who they want to associate with?
 

wan

Well-known member
America is not just about "white people". I know you didn't say so in exactly so many words. White people themselves are immigrants. So why just think about "what will white people gain from it"?

I never said America is only for white people. I am just pointing out that all those things that you guys tout only benefit one part of America--namely the black people. Another part of it, namely, white people, gain nothing from it. So you cannot say that it benefits us all, because it doesn't.
 

david starling

Well-known member
Are you saying that you condone FORCED integration, David?

It's not about intentional mixing, the way segregation is intentionally about not mixing. It's about the right to be treated fairly, and for everyone to be able to work, shop, go to school and dine out wherever they choose.
 

Dirius

Well-known member
It's not about intentional mixing, the way segregation is intentionally about not mixing. It's about the right to be treated fairly, and for everyone to be able to work, shop, go to school and dine out wherever they choose.

Why did CHAZ (seattle autonomous zone or something), created by BLM activists, had segregated areas that said "black people only"?

Are you suggesting this fellas were breaking the law ... and also being racist?
 

aquarius7000

Well-known member
I think her reasoning was more of the:

"If you don't like it here why stay?" - which is a common response to anyone who berates against their own country.

Like "if you don't like capitalism, why not emigrate to socialist paradise Venezuela?"

Its not in itself a racist statement.

Is practicing racism and thereby indirectly causing a rift in the society of your "own country" not berating it?

Wouldn't it then be better to just yourself "emigrate" to a place - say if one likes only whites to a place with a very low non-white population, so a more heterogenous society can live in peace and unity, and you can dis-integrate yourself from the current society to a place where you don't need to be concerned about integration at all (at least not when it has to do with mere skin-colour and looks)?
 
Top