Celebrity Synastry Charts

I am puzzled by something:

If orbs are the be-all and end all with synastry/composite charts, why do astrologers use celebrity charts as examples for longevity or friction when they have no idea of the time of birth for these individuals?

They point out how "this aspect" looks, when they have no real idea if it is an aspect or not because they don't know the orb values.

So either those "analyses" are baloney and not to be used as examples for anything, ever, or orb values really don't mean much and it is the signs that matter. If they are great examples (people, for example, will point to "wonderful" aspects of Paul and Linda McCartney or John Lennon and Yoko Ono) of how these aspects play out, then clearly it's not the orb value that matters, it's the signs themselves.

Am I missing something here?

Who are these astrologers making these outrageous claims with celebrities??

I don't think an astrologer guesses aspects. lol

And you said time of birth... The time of birth only changes the Ascendant and the moon. The time doesn't really affect orbs unless it has to deal with Moon or Ascendant aspects.

I'm assuming you meant the birth date, and time.