Thank you all for this insight.
That's right, and somehow Lilly wasn't fluent in Italian to translated Bonatti's technique AND same goes to Bonatti who wasn't fluent in Greek to translated Valens' technique. So there you go...
Bonatti wrote in Latin, which Lilly was quite capable of reading and writing. Bonatti might have known Greek. He did know Arabic, and translated a lot of the Arabic astrologers in his opus.
Lilly, and Teucer in Germany, were the odd ones for writing astrology books in the vernacular.
So for example come 2020 when we see a lot of queries, "Who will win the election?", this question cannot be asked in a horary?
Ms ElenaJ, I thought horary can't answer such as question? Unless you are the actual person.
Asking
R
Horary astrology and mundane astrology are entirely different things. Horary astrology requires a chart cast for the date, time, and place that you asked the question. Unless you yourself are in Surabaya, Indonesia, and you cast this chart at precisely 7:01 pm local time on Sunday, December 23rd, 2018, this is not a horary chart.
Furthermore, horary astrology cannot be used to explain world events, unless it's a world event specifically about the person asking the question, and the question is about a personal stake in the matter that no one else has. For example, if you were running for elected office, you could cast a horary asking if you would win. That would be about you personally. While other people might be affected by the outcome of the election, you winning or losing would be a personal matter to you, and would not affect anyone else in that particular way. If, on the other hand, you were just an average citizen of a country having a major election, a horary chart cast by you to ask who would win would not be valid, because you would not have a personal stake in the matter, any more than millions of other people do.
Since you do not have a personal stake in this event--even if you were there, so were many others--this is not a horary question you can legitimately ask. And even if you were there, knowing what caused it isn't going to change anything. So, if anything, this is a mundane astrology question. Mundane astrology is the branch of astrology that deals with world events.
Because this is really a mundane astrology question, I have moved it to Mundane Astrology, which is a subforum of Other Astrology.
You too
It doesn't matter, it's not an insult to learn from the rookie(s) whos know astrology since October 2018.
Best wishes
R
Hate to spoil your fun
but I remember when this happened.
She slipped when drunk and fell into the water.
I would trust what the authorities did at the time.
I’d be very careful with your words, you never knows who reads these things.
There is a new book out about the death of Natalie Wood. The captain on the yacht that Wood and Wagner were on, as well as her sister have indicated that Wagner might be responsible for Wood's death, and he is now a "person of suspicion". Wagner of course denies it all. Is he guilty?
Davern, a family friend as well as Navy vet
was the captain that fateful weekend.
He has said in multiple interviews
—and in a
]
Not disputing what you know, I have no contact with anyone in the case and you're certainly better informed.
However, can you agree that reading comments like "she slipped and fell while drunk." makes sense, but how does that explain the missing dinghy?
Also, people on nearby yachts hearing someone calling for help, but no one on Wagner's yacht hearing anything, seems strange, doesn't it?
At any rate, he is now considered a "person of suspicion" since the case was reopened, there must be a reason for this procedure?
Not biased, just curious. It was more an exercise in horary, since I have no vested interest whatsoever in the outcome, and I took advantage of the moment the question popped into my head to do the chart.
Yes, late degree on the ascendent, which could also mean the matter is already concluded.
Interesting the quote you wrote by Walken.
Also interesting all the comments in general about horary.
All summed up, quite stimulating, no?
Not disputing what you know,
I have no contact with anyone in the case and you're certainly better informed.
However, can you agree that reading comments like
"she slipped and fell while drunk." makes sense,
but
how does that explain the missing dinghy?
Also,
people on nearby yachts hearing someone calling for help,
but
no one on Wagner's yacht hearing anything,
seems strange, doesn't it?
At any rate, he is now considered a "person of suspicion"
since the case was reopened, there must be a reason for this procedure?
The mysterious death of Natalie Wood
Investigators say
Robert Wagner's story on Natalie Wood's death doesn't 'add up'
Lt. John Corina, of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department's homicide bureau
said in a press conference Monday
that the details Wagner has offered up on the fateful night
"really don't add up to what we've found.
He's a person of interest
because he's the last person with her
before she went in the water
This is a suspicious death investigation.
We want to know what happened
from the time of the argument to when she got into the water."
(CNN) https://edition.cnn.com/2018/02/05/entertainment/natalie-wood/index.html
Great thanksI have studied the case. Have you?
You have an agenda which I'm not interested in.
So I'll leave you/JupiterAC to your 'intel' from the web.