isisosirus
Banned
sorry for so many charts
I just want.
I just want.
Last edited:
It seems to me like most women who hear "hes in a relationship" automatically side with the one hes currently with. I want an unbiased analysis, thats all.
Can you please explain how you came to this conclusion?
The querent is always the asc ruler under every circumstance.
I would have to disagree. That is against rules for horary.
In this chart I asked "will we be together?" Here is my interpretation:
The significators mercury and jupiter are in mutual reception, albeit both in detriment, and mercury, his significator is exalted in my sign. Mercury (him) applies to Jupiter (me). This points to strong potential of us coming together, but even more so, because Venus, at 25° conjuncts Spica, as well as the Asc/Dec axis= very favorable and Venus collects the light of both significators, mercury and moon. Not ONLY that, but the quesiteds natal Venus conjuncts the horary Venus exactly. Further reinforcement.
There is, of course, even more detail than this, but would anyone have anything to add?
Well considering our significators have always been mercury and jupiter, they remain mercury and jupiter. Its not logical that i wouldnt be ruled by the Asc.
Since you want to teach horary why dont you give some examples of cases when the ruler of the Asc is not the querents significator.
Still havent gotten any good evidence here. Because what you're saying simply isn't true. If it were true, there would be facts and evidence to back it up.
No one has analysed the chart "will we be together?" In the original chart, i did not ask that. Period. Explained in my other thread.
I have a pluto transit to venus in 5 years. So does he, because our venus' are opposite.
I'm done. I'll go somewhere else. Now I know what not to divulge. Stick to facts of the charts, people. I dont need your counseling.
Thank you.