Trump himself is the Great Divider. There is no "conspiracy" against him, just those who rightly or wrongly disagree with his policies, which is a right guaranteed by the Constitution; and, those who deplore his inflammatory rhetoric.
have to disagree with you here. That Russian 'investigation' was nothing more than a FBI plan to make him look corrupt, based upon a phony dossier, bought and paid for by the DNC and Hilary C.
It's no wonder he calls people out for being part of the Deep State. That does exist, it is not a figment of his imagination. They even have 2 of the main bad actors, in their own texts, discussing their 'insurance plan' against him becoming President. That plan involved the 'Operation Crossfire' investigation, in which lower level Trump employees would be accused of meeting with Russian Operatives, who were actually CIA and such spooks.
There is plenty of documented EVIDENCE, starting with recent IG reports on the phony FISA documents used to get this all started, if anyone is interested in doing some research themselves.
Trump's inflammatory rhetoric is understandable, considering the onslaught of corruption which he is battling everyday, just to start in the White House.
The FISA Scandal Is about Corruption, Not ‘Sloppiness’
April 2, 2020
https://www.nationalreview.com/2020...fisa-scandal-about-corruption-not-sloppiness/
When 96 percent of spy warrants reviewed contain serious errors or omissions — that’s wholescale fraud, not a few little slip-ups.
Consider this scenario: A federal lawyer is filling out applications requesting FISA warrants to spy on American citizens who work for a major presidential campaign to determine whether the campaign staffers are collaborating with a foreign power to steal the presidency of the United States.
In December, Inspector General Michael Horowitz found that the FBI had included “at least 17 significant errors or omissions in the Carter Page FISA applications and many errors in the Woods Procedures” during its Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
A new IG report looked at another 29 applications the FBI filed to get permission to spy on “U.S. Persons” (this can include green-card holders who are non-citizens). The FBI couldn’t even find “Woods Procedure” files — which contain “supporting documentation for factual assertions contained in the FISA applications, as required by FBI policy” — for four of the applications, while every single one of the other 25 that auditors examined had “apparent errors or inadequately supported facts.” In addition to the 29 applications audited, the IG looked at the FBI’s own “application oversight mechanisms” relating to 42 FISA applications.
You would think that this kind of potential abuse by the Justice Department would pique the interest of mainstream journalists. No such luck.
Put it this way, the new IG report found a total of 390 problems in 39 of the 42 applications that “including unverified, inaccurate, or inadequately supported facts, as well as typographical errors,” and it found another 20 issues per application in the new audit.
If you’re keeping score at home, only three of 75 FISA applications (4 percent) used to spy in the investigation, starting in October 2014, were not problematic. Whoops!
It’s even worse than it looks, because Horowitz didn’t scrutinize the raw-evidence case files, which, for all we know, is teeming with mitigating evidence and facts omitted from the applications. If agents were this “sloppy” with warrants, what makes anyone believe that they collected the foundational evidence in a more professional manner?
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/4...vide-most-damning-evidence-of-fisa-abuses-yet
FBI email chain may provide most damning evidence of FISA abuses yet
Just before Thanksgiving, House Republicans amended the list of documents they’d like President Trump to declassify in the Russia investigation. With little fanfare or explanation, the lawmakers, led by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), added a string of emails between the FBI and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to their wish list.
The email exchanges included then-FBI Director James Comey, key FBI investigators in the Russia probe and lawyers in the DOJ’s national security division, and they occurred in early to mid-October, before the FBI successfully secured a FISA warrant to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
The email exchanges show the FBI was aware — before it secured the now-infamous warrant — that there were intelligence community concerns about the reliability of the main evidence used to support it: the Christopher Steele dossier.
The exchanges also indicate FBI officials were aware that Steele, the former MI6 British intelligence operative then working as a confidential human source for the bureau, had contacts with news media reporters before the FISA warrant was secured.
But the FBI withheld from the American public and Congress, until months later, that Steele had been paid to find his dirt on Trump by a firm doing political opposition research for the Democratic Party and for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, and that Steele himself harbored hatred for Trump.
If the FBI knew of his media contacts and the concerns about the reliability of his dossier before seeking the warrant, it would constitute a serious breach of FISA regulations and the trust that the FISA court places in the FBI.
That’s because the FBI has an obligation to certify to the court before it approves FISA warrants that its evidence is verified, and to alert the judges to any flaws in its evidence or information that suggest the target might be innocent