Re: Cary2's post #30.
Cary, nobody has the patience to sit through your hours of YouTube.
If you have something to say, try for a concise and "tidy" set of your own points.
Climate change is very real. This is what the vast majority of actual professional climate scientists understand. I understand it from visits to the Columbia Ice Fields in the 1970s and 2010s; as well as Glacier National Park. The glaciers are shrinking. Sea level is rising, and so on. One can only hope that mitigation measures in place are slowing down the rate of change.
I hate to break it to you, but the motive for making GMOs was not some kind of sentimental wish to prevent world hunger. It was profit.
The problem with uncontrolled GMO substitutions for traditional crops has to due with preserving the genetic diversity of crop plants, and inadequate research on their environmental impacts. Also with driving small farmers internationally off their land, because only big farmers can afford expensive patented seeds and animals, let alone the equipment to process them, that cannot be propagated on their own. Did you know that the majority of the world's agriculture today is controlled by only 6 Big Agra firms? (Monsanto, Cargill, &c.)
Sensible people want no more uncontrolled experiments with the world's food supply. They don't want food security taken out of their hands. Apparently you do.
But I guess the hard right is all for laissez-faire capitalism of this nature.
Also try to understand what other people actually say. It's not about your own personal straw-man riff on what you mistakenly think they must believe in order not to join the hard right.
You persist in sticking to your fallacious two-way binary: anyone who doesn't buy into a hardcore rightwing ideology and Trumpism must be a leftist of the worst type.
That's precisely what the right wing does not understand about everyone else.
You misunderstand the debate about IQ tests. There weren't hordes of anybody storming college campuses. It turned out that the old IQ tests didn't distinguish cultural and economic differences among students. Kids with books in the house would score better than kids without books in the house, regardless of innate intelligence. Parents' socio-economic status was the best predictor of how students would score.
But today, there are lots of fun IQ tests available on-line. Why don't you take some, and tell us how you score?
I do love your expression, "identitarian politics." There's been a lot of it going on among white people for a long time.
On Trumpism as a cult, psychologists identified the earmarks of a cult long before Trump took office. Some of them do not apply but these do:
*They minimize or discourage access to non-cult sources of information (TV, internet, former members, and so on).
*They make extensive use of cult-generated information and propaganda (YouTube, newsletters, movies and other media).
*They require members to internalize the group's doctrine as truth (black-and-white, good vs evil thinking).
*They use loaded language and clichés which constrict knowledge, stop critical thoughts, and reduce complexities into platitudinous buzz words.
*They instill fear, such as fear of the outside world, enemies, leaving or being shunned by the group.
https://www.oprahmag.com/life/relationships-love/a33648485/signs-of-a-cult/
Cary, I plan to start a thread on how Jesus might align himself politically if he were alive today. I'll take up the "what would Jesus do" theme there.
Probably you didn't stop to think about the strength of African American churches, and that 87% of African American voters chose Biden in 2020. Similarly, many Hispanics are Catholics. 65% of them voted for Biden.
76% of white evangelicals voted for Trump, but 62% of "others" voted for Biden. That tells us something about the skew in Christian support for Trump.
But once again, thanks for validating the main point of my thread title. It's getting to be a habit with you.