david starling
Well-known member
Is "reality" a dream?
Then why can't Aqua rule a different side of Saturn?
You're taking things you read on popular Astrology sites too literally.
Aquarius is actually a very ethical sign, very stern and strict with their ideals. They are like any other Air sign in the way they approach social norms and communication. All Air signs are free thinkers, eccentric and independent.
Furthermore, Saturn used to be called "the most high" in ancient mythology, was the lord of the Air, and is exalted in Libra. In fact, it was called the one that ruled the air.
Aquarius people are usually disciplined and responsible.
I was talking about EL Elyon the Caananite god.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elyon
http://biomystic.org/restoreEL.htm
Zeus/Jupiter was lord of the sky, the penultimate Sky-god. That doesn't mean Jupiter rules Gemini, Libra, or Aquarius.
I was talking about EL Elyon the Caananite god.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elyon
http://biomystic.org/restoreEL.htm
"Epithet" comes to us via Latin from the Greek noun epitheton and ultimately derives from epitithenai, meaning "to put on" or "to add." In its oldest sense, an "epithet" is simply a descriptive word or phrase, especially one joined by fixed association to the name of someone or something (as in "Peter the Great" or the stock Homeric phrases "gray-eyed Athena" and "wine-dark sea"). https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/epithet
Definition of name. (Entry 1 of 3) 1a : a word or phrase that constitutes the distinctive designation of a person or thing. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/name
In ancient cosmology, air is moist and moderately hot, but Jupiter is hot and moderately moist. That means his element isn't fiery or airy alone, but a temperate admixture of them. It is a mistake to relate him to one element in particular, just as it is a mistake to relate Saturn to earth or water alone. I can easily prove this from the ancient texts.
Saturn's too Earth-bound to properly rule Aquarius. The prefix "Uran" (Latinized Greek for "Ouran") means "of the Heavens", meaning above Earthly concerns alone.
Aquarius is a watery sign, not only can you see this by the constellation (and the surrounding wintry ones), but also in ancient cosmology and physics that has water, the element of winter, as primarily cold, and secondarily moist. Everything else is a modern reinterpretation.
The Earth's atmosphere contains water, and pours down water as rain, but is of the Air-Element.
The Creator placed the sand as the boundary for the sea, a perpetual barrier that it cannot pass; though the waves toss, they cannot prevail, though they roar, they cannot pass over it. By your logic the seas are of the Earth-Element.
Some of the names you gave are certainly not names of God in the Hebrew Scriptures, they are theophoric names of altars, cities and his anointed. ''The Lord My Banner'', ''The Lord Is There'' and ''The Lord Will Provide'' are names of places, not names of God. They include the name of God. Read and study the Bible for yourself and do not trust what other people tell you, even if they call themselves doctors of philosophy or mystics or whatever. You should not trust butchers to operate on your heart and mind, but the Lord our Healer alone.
The God of Israel had nothing to do with the gods of the Caananites, and in the Torah and the Prophets he is warning his people again and again not to worship the gods of other wicked nations in the land, who they were commanded to utterly destroy if they did not submit or flee. At every page it is absolutely incompatible with the academic myth of derived worship of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. It is exactly the opposite - the Israelites fell into apostasy and worship of other gods, because they did not obey the commandments of God given to the whole nation, for which they eventually received the punishment of exile.
I apologize for failing to mention that I have and do read the Bible ( specifically the KJV but I am open to scanning occasionally through different versions of it ). Now, that word Theophoric means to “derive from” or “to bear the name of God”. In that definition, for these “names” to be Theophoric then they would need to have God’s name within them. The word God is a title itself. It is not an actual name. The additional “names” I have shown are titles also, as I had said before. Before the actual name had been revealed to Moses on that mountain (Exodus 3:14) (It has been translated from the paleo Hebrew, to Greek, transition to Latin then English. If you would want to go searching for the name then go behind the meaning of what was revealed in that verse. A small expedition for you to have), God was just referred to through titles solely. I am aware that the Hebrew God has no association with the land of Cannon, nor to the population but God have been given titles throughout the ages. Secondly, the Israelites has had multiple incidents of going against the word of God and then being punished for it and then being redeem by God again for recompense of their sins. That is no fresh finding, it is a repetitive occurance. In the scriptures I have read that the God of Israel would never abandon his people though because he had made a covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob then that covenant was inherited to his bloodline (the Israelites).
Now as far as teachings goes and listening to interpretation from people well-versed in scripture, the prophets had to be taught and instructed on the parables of the Messiah also before they could go to teach. The sky didn’t just crack open and God had reign a light upon every prophet’s head saying “I have chosen you”. They needed to be taught those mysteries and when they were able to understand them, they went to go spread the word. I must add, I will not just go to anyone who claims to be the “holder of truth”. I go from person to person and filter the information to see if it is truth.
I do have a question if you do not mind that I ask of you but do you read the Bible or do you have the Torah (which derives from Islamic religion) mistaken for a Bible or do you read them both? If this question isn’t too intrusive.
The Torah predates the teachings of Islam, doesn't it?
The Torah predates the teachings of Islam, doesn't it?
Although its roots go back further, scholars typically date the creation of Islam to the 7th century, making it the youngest of the major world religions. Islam started in Mecca, in modern-day Saudi Arabia, during the time of the prophet Muhammad's life. https://www.history.com/topics/religion/islam
Rabbinic writings state that the Oral Torah was given to Moses at Mount Sinai, which, according to the tradition of Orthodox Judaism, occurred in 1312 BCE. The Orthodox rabbinic tradition holds that the Written Torah was recorded during the following forty years,[53] https://www.aish.com/jl/h/48944541.html?mobile=yes