Thomas H Burgoyne

Opal

Premium Member
Good morning! Got back late last night, cold nasty wind, and snow came in, I am home until it relents. I haven't read anything yet.

Good morning coffee is ready! :love:
 

Monk

Premium Member
Hi Opal,


There is only one more secret to tell regarding our calendar, up to this point we have been looking at Sirius on the MC at midnight on 1st January by Projected on the Ecliptic Measure, but Pope Gregory XIII's astrologers were far more clever than that, as i will explain.


To keep Sirius on the MC will only last a couple of centuries within 1 degree orb, then it becomes out of sync with alignment.


I think in 1582, they knew this would happen, but also knew the accurate paran alignment of Sirius would take over during this time, which it did in the early 1800's as shown on private members download below:-
 

Attachments

  • picture 47 40% (2).png
    picture 47 40% (2).png
    351.3 KB · Views: 29

Opal

Premium Member
What will be strongly influencing the horizon in a few hundred years?

I will be back tonight. I have some hospital visitations today. My elderly friends are not doing well. Saturn and Pluto must be figuring in their charts.
 

Monk

Premium Member
Hi David, Jup and Opal,


I have just found a very juicy conspiracy regarding rectified birth charts on Astro Data Bank that is very dubious, and i doubt that i will ever trust them again.....interested?


I'm not sure how much i can write today, but we use Astro Data Bank so much! And is on topic as it all leads back to Thomas H. Burgoyne!!!


Sorry Opal, it involves a Canadian Hermetic astrologer, she must be! Lois M. Rodden was the driving force behind Astro Data Bank, she learned astrology from the Church of Light as shown below:-


https://www.uraniatrust.org/index.php/celebrated-astrologers/lois-rodden
https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/church-light
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Light
 
Last edited:

Monk

Premium Member
I thought i would start with Roddens rectified chart of Helena Blavatsky, and the reasons behind it! https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Blavatsky,_Helena


If you scroll down to to "Source Notes" you will see Rudhyar wanted to give her a Sirius rising, but that is down to wanting to give her Hermetic meaning, but doesn't make it true!


Some think birth happened on the night of 30/31st July, Opal don't get confused as Russia was following the Julian Calendar at the time, so 12 days has to be added to make astrology charts accurate!


I'll be back soon!
 

Monk

Premium Member
Rodden gave Madame Blavatsky a rectified time of birth as 02:17 AM, only because she wanted her to have hermetic meaning with the other star i study, being Alnilam, Belt of Orion and Osiris star!


The time was chosen to have Alnilam rising by paran at location, but this doesn't make it true, and makes the whole chart inccurate, i wish hermetic astrologers and secret brotherhoods would stay out of astrology, it makes things very difficult to study a contaminated chart!
Even childrens books are heavily contaminated with hermetic philosophy:-
https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Cassandra_Vablatsky



Paran Graph below showing Alnilam rising!
picture 52 40% (2).png
 
Last edited:

Opal

Premium Member
That's weird. She was what she was, what would be gained by altering her chart. She reminds me of a female Crowley.
 

Opal

Premium Member
Rodden gave Madame Blavatsky a rectified time of birth as 02:17 AM, only because she wanted her to have hermetic meaning with the other star i study, being Alnilam, Belt of Orion and Osiris star!


The time was chosen to have Alnilam rising by paran at location, but this doesn't make it true, and makes the whole chart inccurate, i wish hermetic astrologers and secret brotherhoods would stay out of astrology, it makes things very difficult to study a contaminated chart!
Even childrens books are heavily contaminated with hermetic philosophy:-
https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Cassandra_Vablatsky



Paran Graph below showing Alnilam rising!

Do we have a chart that Blavatsky used for herself?

I have some of her writings, I will go see if I can find them.
 

Opal

Premium Member
Hi David, Jup and Opal,


I have just found a very juicy conspiracy regarding rectified birth charts on Astro Data Bank that is very dubious, and i doubt that i will ever trust them again.....interested?


I'm not sure how much i can write today, but we use Astro Data Bank so much! And is on topic as it all leads back to Thomas H. Burgoyne!!!


Sorry Opal, it involves a Canadian Hermetic astrologer, she must be! Lois M. Rodden was the driving force behind Astro Data Bank, she learned astrology from the Church of Light as shown below:-


https://www.uraniatrust.org/index.php/celebrated-astrologers/lois-rodden
https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/church-light
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Light

Manly P Hall was Canadian too. I don't take it personal. You have Crowley:happy::happy::happy:
 

Monk

Premium Member
Let me refresh my mind on Harry, I will be back.


Hi Opal,
By the time that Lois Rodden made up about when Harry Truman was born, the M.C. was 11* 50' Cancer and Sirius was 12*29' Cancer by projected measure, this is comical!


The time given on Franklin D. Rooselvelt birth horoscope is 30th January 1882 at 20:45pm New York.
https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Roosevelt,_Franklin_D.


At this time the M.C. would have been 22*08' Gemini, and Alnilam, Belt of Orion and Osiris Star was at 21*50' Gemini by projected measure!


I wonder if it is just me who has a twitchy nose regarding these dubious times?


Franklin D. Roosevelt was a 32* Freemason
 
Last edited:

Monk

Premium Member
Last edited:

Opal

Premium Member
Hi Opal,
By the time that Lois Rodden made up about when Harry Truman was born, the M.C. was 11* 50' Cancer and Sirius was 12*29' Cancer by projected measure, this is comical!


The time given on Franklin D. Rooselvelt birth horoscope is 30th January 1882 at 20:45pm New York.
https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Roosevelt,_Franklin_D.


At this time the M.C. would have been 22*08' Gemini, and Alnilam, Belt of Orion and Osiris Star was at 21*50' Gemini by projected measure!


I wonder if it is just me who has a twitchy nose regarding these dubious times?


Franklin D. Roosevelt was a 32* Freemason

I am not up on American history. I really try to stay out of political aggravations.

I feel, it is getting worked up about things I have no control over, like the price of gas.

I do know that the Rosicrucian's were infamous? famous? for faking death.

I don't regard Roosevelt with royalty. I am not familiar with Rodden either. Did she marry into America, or move there?
 

Monk

Premium Member
Hi Opal,


Most of our data regarding birthcharts come from Lois M. Rodden's astro databank, a great deal of birth details are featured there that she picked up herself, however she was prone to rectify time when she wasn't sure.


She originately came from Canada, moved to the USA and married, she wasn't an astrologer before she joined "The Church of Light" who trained her that Thomas H. Burgoyne was involved with.


I'm just getting started with politician's birthcharts that are correct or dubious regarding the time of birth mostly from the era of when Lois M. Rodden was in charge of Astro Databank that includes many of her personal charts she collected.


I'm finding many politicians that have a Sirius or Alnilam connection by either Paran or projected on to the angles.


The rating system used by Astro Data Bank is on link below, however if Rodden wasn't completely sure i think she would rectify charts to show powerful stars:-


https://astrologyforaquarius.com/articles/338/lois-rodden-and-data-grading
 

Monk

Premium Member
We know that Lois M. Rodden rectified her own birth chart as she didn't know the time.....but did she enhance it, make it a more powerful chart?


https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Rodden,_Lois_M.


These links are confusing, please click on "Search for this page title" after clicking on above link, then click on the first link at top of the page, it will also tell you about her personal history!
 
Last edited:

Monk

Premium Member
Hi Opal,


There are 4 Royal Persian Stars, they are powerful, being Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut, which you have on your chart.


It would seem that Lois M. Rodden wanted two persian stars on her chart for the time of birth that was rectified shows Antares on the M.C. (True South) by paran and Albebaran on the Nadir or I.C. by paran (True North).


Graph below:-
 

Attachments

  • picture 53 40% (2).jpg
    picture 53 40% (2).jpg
    49.8 KB · Views: 27

Opal

Premium Member
Hi Opal,


Most of our data regarding birthcharts come from Lois M. Rodden's astro databank, a great deal of birth details are featured there that she picked up herself, however she was prone to rectify time when she wasn't sure.

Are the rectified charts marked to denote rectification? I was under the impression that they had to be stated to be so.


She originately came from Canada, moved to the USA and married, she wasn't an astrologer before she joined "The Church of Light" who trained her that Thomas H. Burgoyne was involved with.

I like church buildings. I don't like being there for services. I go for funerals, weddings, baptisms, tea, or work. I prefer not to work at them though, you observe too much bad behavior from the powers that control the strings.

I'm just getting started with politician's birthcharts that are correct or dubious regarding the time of birth mostly from the era of when Lois M. Rodden was in charge of Astro Databank that includes many of her personal charts she collected.


I'm finding many politicians that have a Sirius or Alnilam connection by either Paran or projected on to the angles.


The rating system used by Astro Data Bank is on link below, however if Rodden wasn't completely sure i think she would rectify charts to show powerful stars:-


https://astrologyforaquarius.com/articles/338/lois-rodden-and-data-grading

Powerful stars do not ensure power. Common people, like me, have powerful stars. Rectifying by that alone, is pretty cheesy. To rectify it takes actions of life to prove the burden of evidence.

I too, am dismayed at your findings. It definitely shortens the length of and the validity of astro's database.
 
Top