Sorry, just a humorous attempt to lead the conversation away from the last argument. I think I may have misunderstood you somewhere.
And btw I'm not sure what you mean by "misquoting". All I did was take your response and crop out the part leading to the "mental stimulating" without any further edit. If by any way this is "misquoting" by your definition, then you have my sincere apology.
Not yet, though I'd say I'm almost done with analyzing my data. So far it has been a wild ride.
I have been reading through the guy's answers to "fan mails" (pretty sure they were trolls in disguise). So say someone asks him "What kind of music do you usually listen to? And do you use music to aid your creativity like many artists do?" you would see something like this from him "Yes. No". IDK if he was being lazy or not. The point is that he didn't read between the line and he didn't bother to separate two answers. This threw me off the first time I saw it because I couldn't understand what he was saying. It became a big pattern in his writing and at one point people questioned him if he was intentionally ignoring fans. He started to add more "emotion" in his later mails, and most of the time it was because he was arguing about women, homosexuality and video games.
The most interesting conversation so far is between him and a fan called "Jeffrey Dahmer". Jef wanted some help with his messy house. At one point he said his fridge was so stuffed he was afraid to open it. Pretty sure this was a bait for reaction because everyone knows what's in the real Dahmer's fridge. The autistic guy then told Jef to overcome his fear and open the fridge. The autistic guy didn't usually show concern for people like that, but at the same time he could be oblivious to the fridge hint (he's pretty sheltered as far as I know). So I'm really confused right now, I don't know if I should classify this as the guy failing to read between the line, or a step up from his usual speech pattern