My understanding is that we are supposed to be moving towards Rahu as the soul gains greater consciousness
on its path towards God. We are not supposed to be moving towards Ketu. I was looking at a chart yesterday
that seems paradoxical.
How can someone achieve the goals of a Leo Rahu if their Sun is conjunct Ketu in D-60 (with Sun being
Atmakaraka and rasi lagna lord)? Wouldn't this indicate an important focus on Ketu? In the rasi, Sun is not
conjunct Ketu. But Ketu is 10th from Atmakaraka in rasi. In D-10, this person also has Sun conjunct Ketu.
Leo North Node is about developing ego, leadership, confidence, and creativity. Yet a Ketu-Sun conjunction is
the opposite of ego and confidence. Seems rather paradoxical if an individual is supposed to be focusing on Rahu,
but yet the AK/Rasi Lagna Lord is conjunct Ketu in D-60? How would you interpret this?
on its path towards God. We are not supposed to be moving towards Ketu. I was looking at a chart yesterday
that seems paradoxical.
How can someone achieve the goals of a Leo Rahu if their Sun is conjunct Ketu in D-60 (with Sun being
Atmakaraka and rasi lagna lord)? Wouldn't this indicate an important focus on Ketu? In the rasi, Sun is not
conjunct Ketu. But Ketu is 10th from Atmakaraka in rasi. In D-10, this person also has Sun conjunct Ketu.
Leo North Node is about developing ego, leadership, confidence, and creativity. Yet a Ketu-Sun conjunction is
the opposite of ego and confidence. Seems rather paradoxical if an individual is supposed to be focusing on Rahu,
but yet the AK/Rasi Lagna Lord is conjunct Ketu in D-60? How would you interpret this?
Last edited: