Charts without retrograde planets

[psychoEclipse]

Originally Posted by Samantha Bean

That’s exactly the response of someone with a Moon as high a latitude as yours, and the reason also why he generally avoids working with people with this almost highest lunar latitude scenario.

If you don’t understand the personal consequences of an extremely high latitude Moon, then you may not know as much astrology as you think you do.

BTW, you were the one who commented that no one could read your chart. But then again, you would not listen if they did.

I asked why he's wary about such things, not what an high latitude moon can brings. Evidently you didn't check twice before replying to my question.

I'm not interested to look for answers from others when I can find them by myself. I prefer being autonomous than always count on others for my affairs. If he's wary about such nature then that's his choice, but I prefer to do things by myself. I'm willing to met someone who can understand my nature, but, as I mentioned before, it's because it may be helpful on an "alliance" side and NOT because I need to understand myself.

If others wants to understand my nature they can try by themselves. Otherwise, I understand myself and that's why I don't need to ask others to do such.

I think that there's no better teacher than yourself to understand such things and others can't really do something alike, because everyone experiences life differently.

[JUPITERASC]

Originally Posted by psychoEclipse

I asked why he's wary about such things, not what an high latitude moon can brings. Evidently you didn't check twice before replying to my question.



I'm not interested to look for answers from others
when I can find them by myself.

you said - and I quoted your statement:
that you are not interested for answers from others
so one wonders
as to the reason for these questions

Originally Posted by psychoEclipse

I prefer being autonomous than always count on others for my affairs.

If he's wary about such nature then that's his choice, but I prefer to do things by myself. I'm willing to met someone who can understand my nature, but, as I mentioned before, it's because it may be helpful on an "alliance" side and NOT because I need to understand myself.

If others wants to understand my nature they can try by themselves. Otherwise, I understand myself and that's why

I don't need to ask others to do such.

I think that there's no better teacher than yourself to understand such things and others can't really do something alike, because everyone experiences life differently.

[psychoEclipse]

Originally Posted by JUPITERASC

you said - and I quoted your statement:
that you are not interested for answers from others
so one wonders
as to the reason for these questions

Because discussing and searching for answers are two different things; I discuss to find similar ideas or maybe expand my knowledge with things that I don't know. Yet, I know myself very well and when I don't know something is outside my own existence.

[david starling]

As far as I've seen, very few astrologers are using declination to determine the level of significance of an aspect.

[JUPITERASC]

Originally Posted by psychoEclipse

Because discussing

and

searching for answers

are two different things;
I discuss to find similar ideas

or

maybe expand my knowledge with things that I don't know.
Yet, I know myself very well

and when I don't know something is outside my own existence.

Siriusly clear


.

[psychoEclipse]

Originally Posted by david starling

As far as I've seen, very few astrologers are using declination to determine the level of significance of an aspect.

I rarely consider it with other planets, but with the moon it can be useful and the phase is very important too.

My moon is a third/last quarter and thus it have the meaning of knowledge, change and abandoning that leads me to my fate during my life. Since my birth I've experienced all of them, along with an influencing pain that left deep scars. That's what made me understand myself, also hardening my will and making it stronger than ever.

[david starling]

Originally Posted by JUPITERASC

Siriusly clear


.

Dr. farr was clearly an advocate of using declination to determine aspect significance in his own astrology. But, he was also a firm advocate of the "if it works for you" school of thought.

[JUPITERASC]

Originally Posted by david starling

Dr. farr was clearly an advocate of using declination to determine aspect significance in his own astrology.
But, he was also a firm advocate of the "if it works for you" school of thought.

useful to post links supporting your assertion re dr. farr
since he has not posted for many years

and OP is a new member


.

[psychoEclipse]

Originally Posted by JUPITERASC

useful to post links supporting your assertion re dr. farr
since he has not posted for many years

and OP is a new member


.

In fact, I didn't understood who's that Farr. Old member?

[david starling]

https://www.astrologyweekly.com/foru...=8453217<br />

Here's a link to the threads dr.farr started.

Oldest one is dated 2010.

Edit: I'll change it.
Edit: That one's not working either! It got changed when I pushed "save".

[psychoEclipse]

Originally Posted by david starling

https://www.astrologyweekly.com/foru...archid=8453127

Here's a link to the threads dr.farr started.

Oldest one is dated 2010.

The ID it's 8453217, not 8453127.

Even so, thanks.

[david starling]

Originally Posted by psychoEclipse

The ID it's 8453217, not 8453127.

Even so, thanks.

Funny, the 127 link works for me for his threads. What's the 217 link for?

If I look hard enough, I could find the one where dr.farr said that he didn't care if an idea came from a famous astrologer or just an unknown "Joe Blow". If he could use it, it didn't matter who came up with it.

He posted as a scholar and a gentleman. I was sorry he left.

Edit: That's weird. The link I posted just stopped working! Right after I double-checked it by going to it!

[david starling]

This one's working for his profile page. At least at the moment.

https://www.astrologyweekly.com/foru...er.php?u=12947

[psychoEclipse]

Originally Posted by david starling

This one's working for his profile page. At least at the moment.

https://www.astrologyweekly.com/foru...er.php?u=12947

Oh...probably this forum generates the ID itself, based on some data, for a brief time when you search something. It remains cached for a while and then reset; that would explain why it happens.

[david starling]

I just checked, and dr.farr's profile page is still working.

[psychoEclipse]

Originally Posted by david starling

I just checked, and dr.farr's profile page is still working.

Profile pages have fixed IDs, usually. It would be complicated with changeable ones.

[conspiracy theorist]

I might have been joking in that previous retrograde planets thread, but I do in fact have no retrograde planets. I like the ideas of planetary manifestations through time activations being more apparent and obvious, and not second guessing yourself so much (although there are other markers for self-confidence in my chart)