Vallin
Active member
Maybe this goes in the books/reading forum, too.
Joanna Woolfolk, in the HIGHLY recommended 'Only Astrology Book You'll Ever Need' (close to it...real close, especially with the CD-ROM birthchart program), claims that we are already IN the Aquarian Age. According to her it began with the end of WWII with the computer and the atomic bomb. As a Camelot baby of the '60's (PL in Virgo), I know I saw "the dawning of the AGE OF AQUAAAAA-REE-USSS". "Let The Sun Shine IN", ba-bay!
Most astrologers conservatively put the "new" age after 2100. Do you agree with Woolfolk, or do you think this is really an ego appeal to the baby-boomers who are actually paying her rent?! If this is true, then we are also seeing the first revolutionary PL-in-Cap of the Aquarian Age (btw: have you noticed that when PL enters a sign, it is not affected by retrogrades out of the sign. I could say all sorts-a naughty things about PL-in[^_^]Virgo! I just hope that we will follow Renaissance's advice and keep this revolution "peaceful".
Joanna Woolfolk, in the HIGHLY recommended 'Only Astrology Book You'll Ever Need' (close to it...real close, especially with the CD-ROM birthchart program), claims that we are already IN the Aquarian Age. According to her it began with the end of WWII with the computer and the atomic bomb. As a Camelot baby of the '60's (PL in Virgo), I know I saw "the dawning of the AGE OF AQUAAAAA-REE-USSS". "Let The Sun Shine IN", ba-bay!
Most astrologers conservatively put the "new" age after 2100. Do you agree with Woolfolk, or do you think this is really an ego appeal to the baby-boomers who are actually paying her rent?! If this is true, then we are also seeing the first revolutionary PL-in-Cap of the Aquarian Age (btw: have you noticed that when PL enters a sign, it is not affected by retrogrades out of the sign. I could say all sorts-a naughty things about PL-in[^_^]Virgo! I just hope that we will follow Renaissance's advice and keep this revolution "peaceful".