JUPITERASC
Well-known member
This thread is a consequence of a succinct description
I noted on another thread
of a members response to the following question
the response is explaining clearly
why Traditional astrologers do not use dwarf planets/asteroids et al
so for those beginners who have often wondered why
I quote:
I noted on another thread
of a members response to the following question
Petosirus, are you using the "Outers" In your Charts?
Not sure if you're a Traditionalist
or not, since you have an independent approach to Astrology.
the response is explaining clearly
why Traditional astrologers do not use dwarf planets/asteroids et al
so for those beginners who have often wondered why
I quote:
I personally do not.
Obviously dwarf planets are planets because they are wandering stars.
To the ancients, the planets were wandering stars that appear visible and sometimes do not
because they are set under the beams.
That is, they did not make a distinction
between Regulus and Jupiter because one is a planet, and another is a sun, but rather
because of the sphere that appears to be moving Jupiter
across the zodiac of non-wandering stars, the way I understand this.
The ''outers'' are not visible to the naked eye, and are not spheres, and
they distort the symbolism of the number 7.