Certainly astroogy on online forums has its limitationsPersonally, I think astrology is limited. What do you think?
Online forums have limitsEverything has its limits.
That would certainly include astrology.
Certainly astroogy on online forums has its limitations
Online forums have limits
example of an amateur online forum discussion on astrology:
Are you saying non-Internet astrology can be unlimited?
only three - you cannot be Sirius
Randomizing, and categorizing
--Three types of Astrologers:
Guardians of Tradition<--->Conventional Modernists<--->Innovative Modernists.
It's a continuum.
IndeedMore of a conundrum ...if you were to ask me
clearly the foregoing discussionSince it's a continuum, all of your examples are included.
Innovative and Conventional Modernists include some Traditional features, but not others.
Some Guardians of Tradition might include a bit of Modern as well.
As for what makes "a bona fide Astrologer"
there is such a phenomenon
as "a natural", who
innately understands
and
quickly becomes adept
at an activity
others might take far more time and effort
to learn.
Everything has its limits. That would certainly include astrology.
Certainly astroogy on online forums has its limitations
Online forums have limits
Petosiris, that is a deep question.Personally, I think astrology is limited. What do you think?
Ilene, I do understand what you are trying to say, but I don't think that that analogy is well suited to the question here. The purpose of Astrology is not to walk a dog, but to reflect the past and the present and predict the future.Everything has limits. Everything. Including communication, my good friend, JA .
For example, astrology cannot walk your dog
Personally, I think astrology is limited. What do you think?
Petosiris, that is a deep question.
Generally speaking, on earth, everything is limited by time, so everything has its limits.
Now, specifically speaking of Astrology, its strength depends on its practitioner. Astrology is a divine field, and, for that, it is of utmost importance to understand the concepts of the Higher Energy, timelessness, divinity and sentience. Those that do not believe in the like, in my opinion, cannot practice Astrology to its fullest potential. And, it is a very wide field as you can imagine. Those that are not able to predict certain areas or are not truly able to even willing to go in depth will blame it on Astrology you will see. (I am not referring to the ethics of talking about certain (difficult areas).A bad workman always blames his tools, as they say.
Since Astrology is a form of divinity, in my opinion, it is limitless. However, we earthlings are limited, so we can only go so far with it.
Ilene, I do understand what you are trying to say, but I don't think that that analogy is well suited to the question here. The purpose of Astrology is not to walk a dog, but to reflect the past and the present and predict the future.
I'm not clear on how the OP is meant, but obviously astrology does not indicate-- without additional supplementary information-- all kinds of things about your life. Gender, nationality or ethnicity (vs. birth place,) religion, and in a relative sense, whether you are born rich or poor. (I. e., a turned chart can say something about your parents' money, but not whether you were born into into the upper class.)
I also think that you could have two nearly identical charts, but one time-twin was born in Des Moines, Iowa in the US, and the other was born in Kabul, Afghanistan. Obviously their lives will be very different.
I think it is you that has a real problem. You post a thread on a public forum and then try to dictate, no, even impose your own views on others. If others come with their own views, you say "you have a problem". So, then why even shape the thread as a question, just dictate your view in the title itself, and people can stay away instead of wasting their time, which is what I am going to do now. Honestly!I've posted this on this forum, because it is obvious that such thinking is unacceptable in philosophy and science. First you have to define your subject and to show your statements are refutable. If you view astrology as encompassing the universe, you have a problem...
The charge that industrial/scientific progress is truly "progress" is not unanimous. In fact there are a number of persons, both of secular and non-secular persuasions, who think that modernity is actually in a state of decline. The decrying of the religious fanaticism conveniently forgets the atrocities that have occured during the 20th century under industrialist regimes and philosophy - National Socialist Germany, the Communism of Russia, Red China can all boast about death tolls in the MILLIONS. And lest we forget, two world wars have been fought in the 20th century. Quite a bloody century it was, which came after Nietzsche's pronouncement of the death of God.