Witchyone
Well-known member
Now that, is some good writing!
Ha! Thank you.
Now let's see what you think of my response to your post.
Now that, is some good writing!
I hear this a lot, but I think it's dangerous, self-serving thinking. I think it's rationalizing selfishness. I've noticed that people tend to say this when they are putting down a person who acts on behalf of others. Rather than afford that person moral admiration, they look for some way to make that person's service to others less impressive, so they can feel better about being self-focused and not serving others. "At least I'm honest," they tell themselves. "That seemingly good person is just a fake/martyr/whatever."
The next step in this line of thinking is to say that people who serve others instead of themselves are weak. The next step after that is to say that weak people _deserve_ to be taken advantage of. And at that step, congratulations, you're a sociopath.
You are missing my point as you still are working within the polarity paradigm I talked about in which service to self and service to others are in contradiction to each other. Yes, within the current worldly paradigm there are something you could legitimately call selfishness but I am stretching beyond the dysfunction of that paradigm itself in which that polarity don't exist.
Greed in the sense of taking from others or from what we in this world call "limited resources" and self-less service in regards to compromising one self for others are both unhealthy ways of addressing one self and other human beings.
Y
They often are in contradiction with one another, though. That's not a false paradigm, but the real condition of humanity.
Thats why I said it is the current state of the world paradigm, and you should know that you cant create solutions that originates from a dysfunctional paradigm, instead you need to create a new paradigm all together.
Y
Namaskaram
If
you become aware
of how many living beings
are giving their lives
to sustain yours,
you will eat
with enormous gratitude.
Sadhguru
Thats why I said it is the current state of the world paradigm, and you should know that you cant create solutions that originates from a dysfunctional paradigm, instead you need to create a new paradigm all together.
Y
The Astrological name for the new paradigm is, "the Aquarian Age". One local astrologer, Rob Brezsny, calls it "The mother of all paradigm shifts". I agree. The imaginary world we live in Now will be superseded by a much better one.
Funny you chose to post about this today.
I have gone vegetarian a few times in my life, but it hasn't stuck. A
few days ago I didn't finish a meal that included some meat.
This has happened countless times, but
this was the first time it struck me as cruel
that a living being died for my dinner, probably inhumanely, and
I didn't even honor that sacrifice enough to eat it.
I wonder if that Sadhguru is speaking of animals he's eaten, or if hes just getting off his chest the notion that he's given way to over extravagant lechery(Haha, wrong choice of word , perhaps. Had to keep it in for amusements sake) *Leeching.
It's amazing what you can plan for
If only we could plan such that old wounds could be healed during a shift into this new (age/paradigm)
Of course concern must lie with overdoing the stitching, so to speak, of old wounds, I'm thinking of trimming too far instead of taking steps back to re-evaluate work.
Emotional tensions can be clouding
I think if there is an afterlife we'd all sleep better in it if we were either to remain calm while planning, or trust in the aptitude of people who still show resolve towards planning the attainment of a better global society, rather than simply coming up with retorts.
Change can be unnerving, but we have the capacity for learning