david starling
Well-known member
.,Of all the astrological markers, the Age indicator carries the greatest burden regarding empirical correlations--theory alone isn't enough. This is because of the extreme length of an Age; entire cultures rise and fall, and should have characteristics of the Ages in which they develop. The Tropical Ages do this quite well, right down to the timing as to when the shared worldview of an Age becomes most evident. Of course there is "cherry-picking" involved; that's always the case when one is looking for facts to support a theory. But in this case, the fruit is low-hanging and abundant. This doesn't prove the theory is objectively correct: It just gives it some credibility. And, that in turn provides it with some predictive value: If it "works" for the past and the present, the chance that it will provide insight into the future increases. Fortunately (or unfortunately if it doesn't live up to the theoretical expectations) some of us will be able to find out for ourselves about the much-heralded Aquarian Age. According to theory, a Portal to the new worldview will open as early as 2030, and some will gladly take advantage of the opportunity, while others will deliberately avoid it. By about 2150, (again, according to theory) a vast majority of the global population will enter the Age: 2150 is when it should effectively manifest worldwide. The Moon plays a huge role in the celestial mechanics.
Last edited: