smilingsteph
Well-known member
At the end of the 1980's whilst studying med. astrology, the question was put which planet was thought to 'rule' Aids. I think the whole class went for Pluto because of the then association with sexuality. The tutor informed us that, due to the reasoning behind the cause of AIDS.... a virus that instigates the gradual disintegration of the immune system, it fell under rulership of Neptune. AIDS is not a personal and/or social disease, therefore rulership by the personal and social planets is not plausible. It is, however, a world wide outer planet influenced disease that is transmitted through personal contact. Not by touch or mentality but by/through transmission of fluid....even in babes. AIDS is no longer terminally destructive, thus rulership by Pluto would not seem to hold true.
An adverse aspect with Neptune alone does not contend AIDS. However, the horoscope chart would show a predisposition towards contraction of the disease through other aspects that are suggestive of behaviour patterns where the personal barriers are unrestricted. I personally believe that Neptune's transit into Capricorn works two-fold. Neptune can dissolve and disintegrate the natural barriers that protect the physical body from outside influences (Capricorn), OR, the natural barriers can withstand the onslaught from alien influences. The Neptune in Capricorn generation is born with the gift to control and conquer the virus before it controls and conquers them.
My 2 cents.
Frisiangal
Nicely stated,
I have a question, one that no one has answered here yet.
What then do we do with Herpes, Syphillis which are also immune disorders that can be life-threatning as well as HIV? It seems that people think that HIV is the only bad guy in this picture.
So then you see a person with a bad neptune, capricorn thingy or whatever....then we say they have HIV? (I am not here to argue the indicators in the natal chart- although I do wonder why astrologers dont look to the actual illness and how it manifests in the body to find out where in the chart it can be seen so to speak)
I guess where I am going with this is that it is not only going to indicate HIV now will it? I dont want anyone here to look at their neptune and capricorn and freak out, because they might just get herpes or something just as interesting....
Now that I am thinking about this, why dont astrologers look to the disease process itself? It seems to me that with these new diseases on board that we would look to a more modern approach (I say that cringing, Kai dont kill me here )
and HIV not as destructive? Are you kidding, unless you care for a dying AIDS patient I dont think I would call HIV/AIDS benign...Not a comment personal towards you frisiangal, but HIV is deadly. True after one seroconverts they have a greater life expenctancy than before, but I wouldnt call it non-destructive. AIDS is terminally destructive, not as much as before the antiviral drugs, but it isnt on the non-terminal list as of yet.
I just dont agree with your instructors view on the HIV/AIDS. Sorry.
Waybread- you said:
Steph, I think in the case of a new disease, we should indeed keep an open mind about its astrological correlations. Medical astrology, as you know, is a well-developed field of longstanding, and its practitioners will probably, in the first instance, look to this field's traditions.
Sometimes keeping an open mind and following traditions with new diseases that traditional astrology didnt understand at the time, confuses me. Using neptune is not traditional is it? I am not being nasty, but really I am not sure?
Sure HIV/AIDS is not a social disease, but I am refering to the mis-communication at the cellular level of the disease process itself. Thus my mercury idea, Lol!. I also like the chiron article too!
PS:
I mean no harm or intent to harm in my reply here. I feel like I need to say this