Donald Trump will be impeached.

[leomoon]

The others told their stories here:
https://twitter.com/postcards4USA/st...19083838935040


I'm sure there are yet more and probably more rapes, but we may never know unless Ghislaine Maxwell talks or produces tapes. -



Usually, when there is such a trauma with a young teenager such as Katie Johnson and the others were, they tend to tell later on, then clam up for decades when they see they aren't believed. I should know, I'm one of them. But ultimately, its more then likely she will come to a breakdown and have to get it out eventually, and take back their own power. Hopefully she'll do it while he is still alive. She's likely married now with children to raise and being harassed and sued by Trump and his fixers, aren't something anyone wants to go through.





from: https://hillreporter.com/e-jean-carr...assaults-77186



Carroll strikes a playful tone in her prose, despite the gravity of the subject matter, revealing her clever signature dark humor: * /She is a Sagittarius Sun 12/13/43 NY

“I remember his weight,” I say. “He leans on you like an oversexed mastodon.”
“If he did, I can’t remember it,” she replies.
And I say: “Maybe you just didn’t feel it.”
Pause.
I raise my eyebrows.
Natasha looks at me, tilting her head. It takes a moment. Then she falls forward and practically rolls on her Zoom table.
Oh yes, surprised reader, we accusers scream with laughter.”

Carroll still has the dress she was wearing the night of her assault, and had taken her own accusations to the next level with a lawsuit against Trump that included a request for his DNA. Despite efforts from Trump’s lawyers to put the lawsuit on hold while an appeals court is deciding whether or not to dismiss a similar lawsuit from another Trump accuser, Summer Zervos, Trump has until September 15th to submit his DNA sample.




THIS and other cases like it is probably why NYSD Prosecutor chief, Geoffrey Berman was fired by Barr...But Berman found a way around it
See the Natasha interview story below -

[leomoon]

E.Jean Carrol and her then radio host TV - husband John Johnson with the Trumps at a Social gathering in New York: (trump claimed he didn't know her) I wonder how his semen got on her dress then? The one currently in court?






journalist Natasha Stoynoff tells E.Jean about interviewing trump while his wife was upstairs and 8mos pregnant - for his 1 year anniversary:



https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...-speak/615664/




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald...r_Zervos_(2007)


2021? If he loses in November, this also awaits him in California case:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/07/polit...uit/index.html

[leomoon]

Sorry, there is soooo much but I didn't want to lose what I found either:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-t...-ca_b_10619944


* case has been since dropped, after he won the nomination in 2016, the very next day! Read the article because it gives a lot of information about the pervert.




The pdf lawsuit:

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...h-new-witness/


This is the third attempt the plaintiff has made in filing this particular lawsuit. Last Friday, she filed an amended complaint, with a new “witness” named “Joan Doe.” The plaintiff and witnesses in the case are using pseud they say, to protect their identities. (see Comments)


It seems to me, she'd be around 40 yrs of age today - I wish her nothing but good health and no harm come to her. Its quite tough coming up against a powerful man (as was the case with Weinstein) and in this case even moreso. He delays trials with his endless lawyers according to Michael Cohen, in order to wear you down....Its a no - win situation, and my hat is off to E.Jean Carroll & Summer Zervos for staying this long.



Katie Johnson speaks of the rape:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpst...ature=youtu.be

[Dirius]

Because every allegation against Trump is based on nothing, given they all came ater his 2016 presidential bid. All of them were filed from 2015 and beyond.

For example Jill Harth settled a lawsuit on a business deal with Trump, and it had nothing to do with a sex allegation.

In fact from wikipedia:"In 2015 she contacted Trump's campaign to get a job as a makeup artist and sell her men's cosmetic product line."

So Jill Harth was looking to get a job from her alleged rapist? HA HA HA - But when she was refused she came forwar with the supposed rape? Yeah thats very believable honey.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald..._(1995_or_1996)

[leomoon]

There was almost no press coverage of Harth’s sexual harassment lawsuit until February, when Law Newz reported on it in February. She filed the suit on April 25, 1997 and the 12-page document, which can be read in full below, includes detailed accounts of incidents Harth claims happened between 1992 and 1997.
However, when the lawsuit was mysteriously dropped in May 1997, the New York Daily News did report on it. When the breach-of-contract suit was settled two months later, the Daily News reported that Trump agreed to a settlement in that case because it would keep Harth from reviving the sexual assault case.




https://heavy.com/news/2016/10/jill-...rtist-lawsuit/


The allegations in the 1997 sexual harassment lawsuit are graphic. She alleges that the following incident happened on January 24, 1993 in Mar-A-Lago:
After Trump business associates left, the defendant (Trump) over the plaintiff’s objections forcibly prevented plaintiff from leaving and forcibly removed plaintiff to a bedroom, whereupon defendant (Trump) subjected plaintiff to defendant’s unwanted sexual advances, which included touching of plaintiff’s private parts in an act constituting attempted “rape.

[Dirius]

Originally Posted by leomoon

There was almost no press coverage of Harth’s sexual harassment lawsuit until February, when Law Newz reported on it in February. She filed the suit on April 25, 1997 and the 12-page document, which can be read in full below, includes detailed accounts of incidents Harth claims happened between 1992 and 1997.
However, when the lawsuit was mysteriously dropped in May 1997, the New York Daily News did report on it. When the breach-of-contract suit was settled two months later, the Daily News reported that Trump agreed to a settlement in that case because it would keep Harth from reviving the sexual assault case.

https://heavy.com/news/2016/10/jill-...rtist-lawsuit/


The allegations in the 1997 sexual harassment lawsuit are graphic. She alleges that the following incident happened on January 24, 1993 in Mar-A-Lago:
After Trump business associates left, the defendant (Trump) over the plaintiff’s objections forcibly prevented plaintiff from leaving and forcibly removed plaintiff to a bedroom, whereupon defendant (Trump) subjected plaintiff to defendant’s unwanted sexual advances, which included touching of plaintiff’s private parts in an act constituting attempted “rape.

So in 2015 she contacted the Trump campaign to get a profitable job after having been supposedly rape by him?

How interesting. It would see that when she had the opportunity for a profitable business deal (in 2015), she didn't care about all those alleged harrasment.

But its funny how the moment she got refused the million dollar contract, she accused Trump of sexual harrasemnt for the first time.


Sorry leomoon, those allegations are as baseless as Joe Biden's campaign.

[david starling]

Originally Posted by Dirius

So in 2015 she contacted the Trump campaign to get a profitable job after having been supposedly rape by him?

How interesting. It would see that when she had the opportunity for a profitable business deal (in 2015), she didn't care about all those alleged harrasment.

But its funny how the moment she got refused the million dollar contract, she accused Trump of sexual harrasemnt for the first time.


Sorry leomoon, those allegations are as baseless as Joe Biden's campaign.

Summer Zervos has a credible lawsuit.

[Dirius]

Originally Posted by david starling

Summer Zervos has a credible lawsuit.

By this statement you are saying all the other allegations are not credible then.

[david starling]

Originally Posted by Dirius

By this statement you are saying all the other allegations are not credible then.

Did I say that? (The answer is "no".)

I'm waiting for you to comment on just this one of so many possibly true allegations. This is the one Trump's really afraid of.

[Dirius]

Originally Posted by david starling

Did I say that? (The answer is "no".)

I'm waiting for you to comment on just this one of so many possibly true allegations. This is the one Trump's really afraid of.

Whats to comment? Summer Zervos filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump. She didn't file a rape or sexual harrasment charge.

Weird huh? Specially when you considered the tried to contact the Trump campaign before she made any allegation.


Its weird how all of these "accusers" never seem to do things the weay most victims do. They always seem to want to have contact with their alleged aggressor.

"I would greatly appreciate reconnecting at this time. He will know my intentions are genuine."

[leomoon]

Originally Posted by david starling

Did I say that? (The answer is "no".)

I'm waiting for you to comment on just this one of so many possibly true allegations. This is the one Trump's really afraid of.

I'd be afraid of the Summer Z lawsuit as well as the E.Jean Carrol lawsuit currently in the New York appeals courts. He keeps "kicking the can down the road" on this one too.



Why did they impeach Bill Clinton btw? Wasn't it for lying about a sexual encounter or two prior to becoming President? That was one of a few impeachment charges:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeac...f_Bill_Clinton


AccusationPerjury / grand juryVotes in favor228Votes against206ResultApprovedAccusationPerjury / Paula Jones case

[leomoon]

From reading Darius posts, its a good thing for the 25 or more Weinstein accusers HE wasn't one of their jurors or Weinstein would be out and about instead of cooking in prison today a billion dollars poorer.
Most of them wanted jobs from him too, and not for his good looks either!


https://nationalpost.com/news/world/...al-in-new-york


https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/...ers/804663001/


I hope that the courts gather the DNA from the donald even if the case is postponed till 2021 - and can't wait for the final report like this one:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeac...f_Bill_Clinton


Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) called the evidence "very critical." Senator Arlen Spector (R-Pa) agreed that it would be "the most powerful kind of corroboration" of an affair. A George Washington law professor, Jonathan Turley, appearing on "Meet the Press" said of the semen stain: "No one will be able to spin him out of that."

FBI: August 3, 1998 Note on Taking of President's Blood


https://famous-trials.com/clinton/889-lewinskydress




At least with Monica, it was not coerced nor against her will as it was with E.Jean Carrol and many of the other victims of the donald.

[leomoon]

Not wishing to argue any further as I have my own opinions about this ape man in the Oval Office, and you have yours. However, this statement (even if she only want money and only SHE knows this, not you and not me)...
is incorrect if I read correctly:

For example Jill Harth settled a lawsuit on a business deal with Trump, and it had nothing to do with a sex allegation.

The case was settled that she & her husband had with trump over beauty contestants business; and PART and PARCEL of the settlement was she was FORCED to drop the sexual allegation suit to have this one settled in their favor.



So my understanding of the articles is that it (the final settlement) had nothing to do with sex allegations, because she COULD NOT have any money for her husband's suit otherwise if she continued to pursue it any longer.



I'm no fan of Republican Socialite Jill Harth personally!




Now perhaps even this too can be qualified, and as I said, I have no horse in this race as for Jill Harth and her husband, as she is still a Republican and said she'd vote for trump. Most monied people did and will again.

[leomoon]

Did anyone else catch the SHAM (not planned with prior WH protocol), Naturalization ceremony complete with "Hail to the Chief" played (in case you forget, ) as the Emperor enters the room to the props set in place to show him as normal:
Woman from India with Sari gown, Moslem woman, woman from South America (brown race) and of course one Somali black man ..... one of each color/background with the exception of the red race? American Indian is already in their country!







Just in case we didn't know that he through Stephen Miller ripped apart the entire department for new cases of naturalized citizens and the various steps they use to be able to take to get there -



Pretend it never happened- in this alternate reality called "trump-world".



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkddHNYu6EY

[Dirius]

Originally Posted by leomoon

From reading Darius posts, its a good thing for the 25 or more Weinstein accusers HE wasn't one of their jurors or Weinstein would be out and about instead of cooking in prison today a billion dollars poorer.
Most of them wanted jobs from him too, and not for his good looks either!

https://nationalpost.com/news/world/...al-in-new-york

https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/...ers/804663001/

Weinstein wasn't found guilty because of the large amount of accusations. He was found guilty because there was evidence against him:

- Witnesses who testified they saw him enter rooms/be in this situation with these women.
- Recorded phone conversations / text messages / e-mails.
- Video evidence of Weinstein on these meeting.
- Conversations which revealed sexual incidents between alleged perperator and victim.

There is no such evidence to back the allegations against Trump. No phone call, no conversation, no witness, no nothing.

And the motives behind the allegations against Trump are usually financial, and after some failed business deal on part of these women.


Sorry none of those ladies have credible claims so far. None have presented evidence. And all of them are seeking large sums of money.

--
-

[leomoon]

Shocking that you'd think 25 or more ladies would be lying and only in it for money! Just shocking, but not really, as there are many men like this.

Sorry none of those ladies have credible claims so far. None have presented evidence. And all of them are seeking large sums of money.

You then, must know more then the judges, both original judges and 2 or 3 appeals courts judges? They found for the plaintiffs that there is MERIT to their claims.

As for "only in it for money"......how much is E.Jean Carroll the New Y ork journalist suing for? I haven't heard of any firm sum of money she's asking for and she WAS raped although she is suing only for defamation at this point in time.


What is this massive amount of cash you think Summer Zervoes the California restaurateur is suing for? Also for defamation (called her a liar, much like you are doing)
I hadn't read about the money angle.


Personally, I believe them and so far, so do the judges in both cases seem to lean in their direction. I guess those judges are either a)female or b) Democrats/leftists,


E.Jean Carrol has one of the top 10 female lawyers in the country on her behalf: Roberta Kaplan: (telling off trump here) through his lawyer...

https://twitter.com/ejeancarroll/sta...641409/photo/2



.................................................. ............


Anyone hear the latest about the oldest living human being who knows Donald Trump like the back of her hand? That would be his sister, the Federal Judge Maryann Trump Barry. The secret tapes came out this past week in which she told her niece that the donald is a spoiled brat, lies about EVERYTHING, has no ethics no morals, no principles"


She is a decade older, 83 to the donald's 73.


She knows him inside out.....


A few of the tape snippets can be heard here:
https://heavy.com/news/2020/08/trump...ne-call-audio/


Barry, 83, a retired federal judge, and the oldest of the Trump siblings, said of her brother as president, “His goddamned tweet and lying, oh my God. I’m talking too freely, but you know. The change of stories. The lack of preparation. The lying. Holy s***.”


HERE she speaks about how she knows he had someone take exams for him to fraudulently get into Fordham College in Pa. Wharton School ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ature=emb_logo

[leomoon]

Since Judge MaryAnn trump Barry spilled the beans on her little brother, (he didn't take his exams but paid someone to take them for him) -

The School is now interested in pursuing this:


A UPenn professor is requesting another investigation into Trump's college admission after his sister said in secretly recorded audio that someone took exams for him




https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=uxbndlbing

[Dirius]

Originally Posted by leomoon

Shocking that you'd think 25 or more ladies would be lying and only in it for money! Just shocking, but not really, as there are many men like this.

You then, must know more then the judges, both original judges and 2 or 3 appeals courts judges? They found for the plaintiffs that there is MERIT to their claims.

As for "only in it for money"......how much is E.Jean Carroll the New Y ork journalist suing for? I haven't heard of any firm sum of money she's asking for and she WAS raped although she is suing only for defamation at this point in time.

Show me the actual evidence against Trump then please?

The phone records or e-mails. The video footage, or whatever empirical evidence that leads you to believe Trump did this.

Can you show the evidence plase? .

Their testimony alone isn't enough - because they could have ulterior motives honey.

Or you can deflect the request altogether and keep crying all over the forum.

[leomoon]

Darius:

I don't know if you are male or female or trans-gender, but "honey??"...to a 73 year old woman is a bit over the top.

The phone records or e-mails. The video footage, or whatever empirical evidence that leads you to believe Trump did this.

As for rape and sexual assaults, they normally don't take place with camera in tow, or flash bulbs for effect, nor on the phone.

Perhaps you'll get your 1,000% proof on trump if and when Epstein's tapes are finally revealed! I hope so, I'd love to see your face and hear your illogical excuses then.


I don't believe either Jeffrey Epstein or Weinstein the Hollywood Producer were sent to prison (both also NYSD cases) - with flash or polaroid photos proving their sexual prowess although it seems Epstein kept video tapes hidden. Imagine that!

[Dirius]

Originally Posted by leomoon

Darius:


The phone records or e-mails. The video footage, or whatever empirical evidence that leads you to believe Trump did this.

As for rape and sexual assaults, they normally don't take place with camera in tow, or flash bulbs for effect, nor on the phone.

Perhaps you'll get your 1,000% proof on trump if and when Epstein's tapes are finally revealed! I hope so, I'd love to see your face and hear your illogical excuses then.

I don't believe either Jeffrey Epstein or Weinstein the Hollywood Producer were sent to prison (both also NYSD cases) - with flash or polaroid photos proving their sexual prowess although it seems Epstein kept video tapes hidden. Imagine that!

A text message could show the alleged perpetrator having an inapropiate conversation with the victim.

Video footage could show the alleged perpetrator behaving inapropiately with the victim.

Both of these examples were present in Weinstein's trial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC4eog5cY9Q

So again dear leomooon... evidence which supports the allegations against Trump?

[leomoon]

Ref:

A text message could show the alleged perpetrator having an inappropriate conversation with the victim. Video footage could show the alleged perpetrator behaving inappropriately with the victim.

I don't think there were cell phones when these girls were raped or assaulted, certainly not for Katie Johnson in 1994. They were not in use then but people used beepers.

As for video footage? One is a Hollywood producer and various movie stars he assaulted - Could easily have been something there....

Not for the common folk! The little girls, or young women being preyed upon by an ape man over 300 lbs. (more then likely then about 250) to their 100-130 lbs.

Actually, the subject is starting to bore me now, big time I'd rather move onto his other crimes he's committing everyday right in front of our noses in the White House and out.
I pass on info that is on legitimate news articles, etc (court docs), for people to take it or leave it. If you want to leave it, then do so. No one is making you believe anything one way or another.

================================================== ========
Examples snips from lawsuits:
most recent court doc - page 2
https://twitter.com/ejeancarroll/sta...641409/photo/2

from Jane Doe aka Katie Johnson lawsuit 2016:

Pg. 4 of 15 (1st lawsuit before the Joan Doe (witness was added in the revised one):


img share upload

[Dirius]

Originally Posted by leomoon

Ref:
I don't think there were cell phones when these girls were raped or assaulted, certainly not for Katie Johnson in 1994. They were not in use then but people used beepers.

As for video footage? One is a Hollywood producer and various movie stars he assaulted - Could easily have been something there....

Not for the common folk! The little girls, or young women being preyed upon by an ape man over 300 lbs. (more then likely then about 250) to their 100-130 lbs.

Actually, the subject is starting to bore me now, big time I'd rather move onto his other crimes he's committing everyday right in front of our noses in the White House and out.
I pass on info that is on legitimate news articles, etc (court docs), for people to take it or leave it. If you want to leave it, then do so. No one is making you believe anything one way or another.

================================================== ========
Examples snips from lawsuits:
most recent court doc - page 2
https://twitter.com/ejeancarroll/sta...641409/photo/2

from Jane Doe aka Katie Johnson lawsuit 2016:

Pg. 4 of 15 (1st lawsuit before the Joan Doe (witness was added in the revised one):

So after that long anti-Trump rant, and the numerous allegations, you can't produce a single piece of evidence to back the allegations against him?

HUH funny

[david starling]

Originally Posted by Dirius

So after that long anti-Trump rant, and the numerous allegations, you can't produce a single piece of evidence to back the allegations against him?

HUH funny

A semen-stained dress is awaiting a dna sample from Trump. He's fighting against that.... "single piece of evidence" by refusing to provide one.

"Funny", right?

[david starling]

Ya know, Dirius, if any or all of these women ARE telling the truth, even though they can't prove in court, there's really nothing funny about it. I, for one, don't find anything even remotely amusing about rape.

[Dirius]

Originally Posted by david starling

A semen-stained dress is awaiting a dna sample from Trump. He's fighting against that.... "single piece of evidence" by refusing to provide one.

"Funny", right?

1) Yep but so far there is no evidence because the DNA hasn't been matched, and may well come out negative.

2) “acid phosphatase activity, a presumptive indication of the presence of semen, was not detected in any of thirty-three fluorescent stains tested on the dress.”
- meaning there is no "semen-stained" dress.

Very funny.

https://fox8.com/news/woman-who-has-...eking-his-dna/