Just want to say that, by revealing my own in and out of sign orbs re: above planets, if any are thinking, 'aha, that's a sign she's an alcoholic to cope with reality', they would be very wrong.
That never even crossed my mind.
Just want to say that, by revealing my own in and out of sign orbs re: above planets, if any are thinking, 'aha, that's a sign she's an alcoholic to cope with reality', they would be very wrong.
Originally Posted by Frisiangal
Just want to say that, by revealing my own in and out of sign orbs re: above planets, if any are thinking, 'aha, that's a sign she's an alcoholic to cope with reality', they would be very wrong.
That never even crossed my mind.
Sun is squared by Mars for me even though Taurus & Cancer are trine signs.
Sun is squared by Mars for me even though Taurus & Cancer are trine signs.
That makes sense.Here's the thing with that aspect, though. Mars does badly in both Cancer and Taurus, or in aspect to anything in Cancer or Taurus. Traditional astrology does not consider trines and sextiles as de facto goods, sometimes they just make it really easy for bad things to happen, depending on the state of the planets involved.
Frisiangal,
I do understand your standpoint, and, though I cannot force you to post your chart, but I do think that I would be able to delineate your relevant area of life without Nep as the ruler of it. .
Don't get me wrong, I do use the outers, but only with tight orbs to inners and certainly not as rulers
I don't like being closed-minded to incoming discoveries and news. That said, being a fixed-sign solar and asc. native, it will take a lot of provable convincing to make me change what I currently live with and believe in - at any given point in time.So how do you see them working?
Jupiter and Saturn are of the traditional 7 planets. Do you count them within the inner circle, or outside of it?
If my Neptune was in 12th house to 9th house Sun, what would be the difference in interpretation to Jupiter? Would there be one from the traditional viewpoint?
You might want to look at ignoring the random blue lines shown by astro.com . Think beyond those random lines and consider that the sign energies are much more important and have a real logic to them, which gives an astrologer a fundament to work with. Since Taurus and Cancerian energies trine each other, earth and water like each other to put it in simple language, planets in these signs cannot square each other.
And to put it into even simpler language, yes they can be squaring each other, if they are 90 degrees apart. Technically they are in a square aspect, no matter what sign they are placed in.
What if they were in a sidereal zodiac, and the signs coincided with a square---would this same chart suddenly have a square, according to your rules?
Geometry is geometry, regardless of the zodiacal references.
And to put it into even simpler language, yes they can be squaring each other, if they are 90 degrees apart. Technically they are in a square aspect, no matter what sign they are placed in.
What if they were in a sidereal zodiac, and the signs coincided with a square---would this same chart suddenly have a square, according to your rules?
Geometry is geometry, regardless of the zodiacal references.
This is Astrology - not geometry or maths. Everything is energy based, not angle based, unless one is confused. Energy goes ahead of angles here.
[deleted attacking comment - Moderator]
Math is the language of the universe though. It literally is. Math and Astrology go hand and hand. Math is the practical and objective language that we use to literally calculate matter and energy. LITERALLY.
There's a reason why trines are the easiest. They are 120 degrees. They make triangles. Triangles are the most powerful building blocks in the universe.
Same with sextiles. You can see hexagons in bee hives because they're a great basic structure.
Things made out of squares have to be perfected and get "worn out" over time because there's a sense of tension with them. People in the modern world agonize for perfect geometric modern furniture with smooth surfaces and flat tops.
And then 180 degrees is like half of a circle so like yeahhh... if you add all the angles of a triangle it will always equal 180.
And then the conjunct is obvious.
Ignoring these numbers because of some signs is ridiculous.
Well said. Worst aspect truthfully is an opposition.
Saturn in my case and Pluto to Moon & Mars.
I like to get my point across and be heard even hammer it in.Yes, Cancer I know. You've told me about that placement in your chart like 10 times.
I have Mercury conjunct my Asc but 12th house.
So houses are sharing energy. Sun & Jupiter in Cancer also share my 12th house.
My charts high point is Moon and it's powered with Mars well both power each other in tandem.
Cap dominant even above my Sun.
I like to get my point across and be heard even hammer it in.
Mars square Mercury... Getting better but as you said yourself takes time.