Astrologers' Community  

Go Back   Astrologers' Community > Anything Else... > Chat > Hot topic arena

Hot topic arena As the title suggest, this sub-board is dedicated to non-astrological talks on interesting, important or controversial topics.


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 06-25-2014, 12:04 AM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

That science is merely suppositions and obfuscation is obvious if one considers reality.
The standard model is now considered finished with the “discovery” of the higg boson particle.
http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/research-innovations/stories/higgs-boson-confirms-reigning-physics-model-yet-again

The nobel prize was given to higgs and englert for this discovery. But keep in mind that this same august body gave obama a peace prize for ranging an unending war. Here the august body game a prize for spending $ 12 billion to find sub atomic debris. They did not find a particle but the debris of a particle that must be the higg boson.
So the standard model is enshrined.

But interestingly the standard model can not explain certain physical conditions that everyone alive experiences very moment.

As my allegation may be seen as ignorant and outlandish in light of the intimate contact we have with technology, I will make a point that all we have to agree shows the ignorance of science.

Most of us have dealt with a flat bike tire. And while fixing it, surely we have all noticed that if one spins the wheel in your hands, the tire exerts a right angle force that allows one to support the tire on one finger. As long as the wheel spins it will remain horizontal and spin around the remaining finger. The rotation creates a force that holds the axles level. But if you want to stop the wheel from revolving around you finger, one must gasp both ends of the wheel axle and hold it steady.
Any rotating body that has mass creates these forces, by Newton’s laws of motion. the more massive the object, the greater the rotations force created. Every day we see the sun go across the sky and the seasons come and go with the steady, fixed orientation of the rotations axis of the earth. The problem is that for these constant movements of the earth to exist, there must be forces that hold the axis steady. If one places a rotating object in a vacuum, it will tumble thru space.
The spontaneous response is Gravity is doing it is keeping the axis fixed in place.. But that is not even close. Gravity is said to result in the planets motion around the sun, but the rotation of the planets have nothing to do with gravity.
No one knows why the planets are revolving. gravity didn’t do it.
So we all feel the steady motion of the earth, but for this to be. there must be a exterior force holding the earth’s axis steady.

Yet ,unbelievably, Science has no answer, in fact Science does not even ask the question. Because the answer must be hidden to conceal the secret of the black magician powers .

The only explanation ever given was an nebulous statement by Ernst mach. He said the every star in the universe is “holding” the axis’s ,of all the planets and stars in the universe, steady.
This is pure conjecture; it has no connection to any known forces. But Einstein coined the term the “mach affect”. But you will be hard pressed to find this in any scientific book .

So the question remains unanswered, what holds the rotational axis of the earth fixed.
Such a big omission in the standard model is hard to comprehend.
This is an example of the Mirrors of Science. One can not believe that science does not have a answer but they do not..
I didn’t figure this out , I read a paper http://teslasociety.com/biography.htm


in this article he calculated the immense rotational forces existing from the earth’s rotation. And then pointed out that scientist ignore this conundrum.
I had to read the article 2-3 times before I realized the simplicity of the scientific omission, he had pointed out.
So science is in fact concealing the most primal dynamics in our world.

Emmnuael velikovsky pointed out the missing celestial dynamic:the electrical fields of the planets and stars.
http://velikovsky.org/en/velikovsky.html
http://varchive.org/




the rotation energies of all the planets and stars is totally ignored by science. there is enough rotational energy existant to provide the missing dark energy. but scientist do not want to focus on a source of free energy, so they come jup with yet another hypothetic energy .


Emmanuel velikovsky pointed out the missing celestial dynamic: the electrical fields of the planets and stars. His theories have been validated with by space probes thru the years, yet the “itelligentsia” , dismisses his work.understanably as he overturns, newton ,Darwin, Einstein and shows the intellectual blind spots of archeology and history. Velikovsky single handedly disclosed the falscity and manipulation of the archeological/historical records.

the magnetic fields of the planets and sun are the forces that orders the universe, just as electrical fields order the world of atoms and sub atomic particle. The affect produced on light by a “gravitation” field and on light produced by an electromagnetic field cannot be distinguished. Both are defined by inverse square mathematical equations I have emphasized repeatedly the glaring omission of scientist to look at the causes for the stability of the earth axis. clearly the editors of history do not want this dynamic included in modern scientific theories as this would reveal the true source of the energies underlying our reality.
It may seem like a simple matter, but recent discoveries are beginning to show the true strength of the rotation of the earth.
The alternating current of our electrical system was called, by it’s inventor.nikolai tesla, a rotating magnetic field system. it is the rotation of the earth that gives the electrical force. Scientist had recently noted that relativistic particles are generated in the van Allen belts. At first scientist thought these near light speed particles had to have come from beyond the solar system. Then recently they noted that these particles were being accelerated in the van allen belt. The problem was where was the van allen belt getting the immense energy to raise these particles to near light speed.
Now they have found out that the magnetic field of the earth’ rotation is the force accelerating these relativistic particles. No scientist thought that the earth’s relatively slow rotation speed could cause these charged particles to form. Yet that is exactly what is happening. they have come up with new theories but still where the energy is coming from eludes them.

The affects Einstein gives to gravity are illusionary, a singularity is illusionary ,black holes are illusionary just as steph hawkens, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-9085016.html
the dean of black holes has determined. Gravity is a mathematical mirror to hide the power of the electromagnetic fields of the earth and sun.
I have emphasized repeatedly the glaring omission of scientist to look at the causes for the stability of the earth axis. clearly the editors of history do not want this dynamic included in modern scientific theories as this would reveal the true source of the energies underlying our reality.
It may seem like a simple matter, but recent discoveries are beginning to show the true strength of the rotation of the earth.


rahu

Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rahu For This Useful Post:
Culpeper (04-08-2016), Flapjacks (06-26-2014), Kscar (07-15-2016)
  #2  
Unread 06-25-2014, 11:44 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

now it seems the higgs boson discovery didnt clarify anything, rather uncovered more issues.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/god-part...-to-exist.html

"Confirmation of the Higgs boson’s existence in July 2012 did not actually add clarity to the general picture of our Universe after all. The information acquired raised new, even more complex, questions.
Physicists at King’s College in London claim they have recreated the conditions following the Big Bang, but this time using the new information acquired with the help of the LHC. British scientists maintain now that the new data related to the so-called ‘God particle’ suggests the universe should have expanded excessively fast after the Big Bang and collapsed billions of years ago."

“We have to extend our theories to explain why this didn’t happen,” Hogan said.


well ,at least we do know the going rate for a nobel prize is 11 billion dollars.

rahu
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rahu For This Useful Post:
Flapjacks (06-26-2014)
  #3  
Unread 06-26-2014, 01:10 AM
Flapjacks's Avatar
Flapjacks Flapjacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 953
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Quote:
Most of us have dealt with a flat bike tire. And while fixing it, surely we have all noticed that if one spins the wheel in your hands, the tire exerts a right angle force that allows one to support the tire on one finger. As long as the wheel spins it will remain horizontal and spin around the remaining finger. The rotation creates a force that holds the axles level. But if you want to stop the wheel from revolving around you finger, one must gasp both ends of the wheel axle and hold it steady.
Any rotating body that has mass creates these forces, by Newton’s laws of motion. the more massive the object, the greater the rotations force created. Every day we see the sun go across the sky and the seasons come and go with the steady, fixed orientation of the rotations axis of the earth. The problem is that for these constant movements of the earth to exist, there must be forces that hold the axis steady. If one places a rotating object in a vacuum, it will tumble thru space.
The spontaneous response is Gravity is doing it is keeping the axis fixed in place.. But that is not even close. Gravity is said to result in the planets motion around the sun, but the rotation of the planets have nothing to do with gravity.
No one knows why the planets are revolving. gravity didn’t do it.
So we all feel the steady motion of the earth, but for this to be. there must be a exterior force holding the earth’s axis steady.
You are talking about angular momentum and inertia. The prevailing theory is that the formation of the planets themselves generate angular momentum. Of course these theories are incomplete!

The rotational axis is not fixed. There is precession, nutation, polar motion. What is it do you mean by fixed?

There is a fundamental disconnection between angular motion and linear motion in Newtonian physics that presents a lot of these problems by making it conceptually awkward. It ends up becoming more descriptive. I think resolving that would go along way to figure out why things can spin and also move through space.

Thank you for mentioning Velikovsky. I have never heard of him. In the archive I found this letter to him from Einstein:

Quote:
Dear Dr. Velikovsky:

The reason for the energetic rejection of the opinions presented by you lies not in the assumption that in the motion of the heavenly bodies only gravitation and inertia are the determining factors. The reason for the rejection lies rather in the fact that on the basis of this assumption it was possible to calculate the temporal changes of star locations in the planetary system with an unimaginably great precision.

Against such precise knowledge, speculations of the kind as were advanced by you do not come into consideration by an expert. Therefore your book must appear to an expert as an attempt to mislead the public. I must admit that I myself had at first this impression, too. Only afterwards it became clear to me that intentional misleading was entirely foreign to you.

With friendly greetings,

Yours,

Albert Einstein
Now that's a double-edged compliment!

Last edited by Flapjacks; 06-26-2014 at 01:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 06-27-2014, 04:50 AM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

what I am describing are examples of the earth's rotation by newtons laws of motion.
you are confusing the precession movement with axis rotational movement. the movement of the axis through precession is thought to be cause by an external source causing this nutation to the earths axis.

you obviously have never done the little experiment I mentioned with the bike wheel. to see one side of the axis of the wheel just suspended in air while the entire wheel rotates around you remaining finger drives house the huge missing force that keeps the earths axis fixed sidereally.

if no force was not holding the axis of the earth steady, the earth would be tumbling around as it orbited the sun. this is straight form the laws of motion.

rahu
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 06-27-2014, 09:40 AM
Flapjacks's Avatar
Flapjacks Flapjacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 953
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by rahu View Post
what I am describing are examples of the earth's rotation by newtons laws of motion.
you are confusing the precession movement with axis rotational movement. the movement of the axis through precession is thought to be cause by an external source causing this nutation to the earths axis.

you obviously have never done the little experiment I mentioned with the bike wheel. to see one side of the axis of the wheel just suspended in air while the entire wheel rotates around you remaining finger drives house the huge missing force that keeps the earths axis fixed sidereally.

if no force was not holding the axis of the earth steady, the earth would be tumbling around as it orbited the sun. this is straight form the laws of motion.

rahu
Actually I've probably done a lot more rotation experiments besides a bike wheel in basic physics classes (also a good one is a spinning stool, i.e. why is it that you can sit on it and not be flung off unless accelerating). Your analogy gets a little difficult when you rely on gravity to balance a wheel on your finger.

You still have not explained what you mean by tumbling around compared to fixed. The rotational axis is not fixed. Do you mean why doesn't the Earth go completely sideways? Are you talking about obliquity (ha, pun)? Perhaps you mean the movement of the rotational axis is constant rather than fixed?

There is nothing in Newton's laws that say a rotating object tumbles unless a force is acting on it. In fact, the opposite. It doesn't tumble unless something is acting on it.

Netwon's 1st Law of Rotational Motion: "A body continues in a state of rest or uniform rotation about its axis unless acted upon by an external torque."

I read some on Velikovsky. Seems he was pretty thoroughly considered and discredited numerous times, basing all his theories on mythology and hunches rather than direct evidence and completely disregarding physical laws in his analysis. Many scientists (surprisingly) seriously considered his propositions, then found them to be false.

I don't disagree that there is some dogma in science. But this is chasing ghosts.

Last edited by Flapjacks; 06-27-2014 at 09:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 06-27-2014, 08:38 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flapjacks View Post
You are talking about angular momentum and inertia. The prevailing theory is that the formation of the planets themselves generate angular momentum. Of course these theories are incomplete!

The rotational axis is not fixed. There is precession, nutation, polar motion. What is it do you mean by fixed?

There is a fundamental disconnection between angular motion and linear motion in Newtonian physics that presents a lot of these problems by making it conceptually awkward. It ends up becoming more descriptive. I think resolving that would go along way to figure out why things can spin and also move through space.

Thank you for mentioning Velikovsky. I have never heard of him. In the archive I found this letter to him from Einstein:



Now that's a double-edged compliment!
like everything else you are posting, it is bits and pieces knowledge disingenuously presented and in fact incorrect.. we can all use a search engine to give shallow view/criticism. I suggest you use a search engine to find a book to read comphrensively on these subjects.a simple sesarch of th elaws of motion will explain the forces create by rotational; movement .

you might have looked at how Einstein had changed his mind, the last time velikovsky and Einstein met.
http://varchive.org/bdb/meeting.htm

"But he was embarrassed. Had he not told me when parting after our last meeting in March about the great importance for the acceptance of a theory that it be able to generate accurate predictions? This was on March 11th. Now, four weeks later, I brought him the message that the very probe that I offered as a crucial test between our stands came out in my favor. Now he inquired what my reasons had been. It was not easy to answer his question, because Einstein became very emphatic. He stood up. His face was glowing. He spoke loudly, in a way I had never heard him speak before. “Which experiment would you like to have performed now?” he asked, in obvious desire to mitigate his guilt, because the previous summer he had not given enough attention to my request, and he let my suggestion go without action on his part. "

so months before Einstein died, he had changed his mind and now accepted velikovsky's theory

flapjacks I am not going to respond to your "scientific" objections because they are of the same nature as your attempt to discredit velikovsky, in spite of the facts and accurate predictions he had given.

rahu
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 06-28-2014, 12:16 AM
Flapjacks's Avatar
Flapjacks Flapjacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 953
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by rahu View Post
like everything else you are posting, it is bits and pieces knowledge disingenuously presented and in fact incorrect.. we can all use a search engine to give shallow view/criticism. I suggest you use a search engine to find a book to read comphrensively on these subjects.a simple sesarch of th elaws of motion will explain the forces create by rotational; movement .

you might have looked at how Einstein had changed his mind, the last time velikovsky and Einstein met.
http://varchive.org/bdb/meeting.htm

"But he was embarrassed. Had he not told me when parting after our last meeting in March about the great importance for the acceptance of a theory that it be able to generate accurate predictions? This was on March 11th. Now, four weeks later, I brought him the message that the very probe that I offered as a crucial test between our stands came out in my favor. Now he inquired what my reasons had been. It was not easy to answer his question, because Einstein became very emphatic. He stood up. His face was glowing. He spoke loudly, in a way I had never heard him speak before. “Which experiment would you like to have performed now?” he asked, in obvious desire to mitigate his guilt, because the previous summer he had not given enough attention to my request, and he let my suggestion go without action on his part. "
This was written by Velikovsky. They are his opinions, so it's not certain what happened between them or how Einstein felt (embarrassed, guilty, whatever).

You do not mention his actual predictions that came true or give any references to them, but what I've found of his predictions have all been false. For one, hydrocarbons on Venus: http://www.researchgate.net/publicat...r_hydrocarbons

That's just the tip of the iceberg.

It's pretty amazing that he got as much interest as he did not being trained in hard sciences. I don't really hold that against him, it's nice to hear that scientists looked at his work despite being more of a scholar than a scientist. It shows science is not totally enshrined. I would like to think it could still be that way if the ideas presented held up to scrutiny.

I didn't use a search engine to look up the laws of motion, except to copy and paste it for you. I've studied the subject enough to find your comments vague and inadequate scientifically, and your links don't help.

I did use a search engine to figure out what overall theory you're indirectly referencing - the Electric Universe Theory it seems - so I could actually read about it. Why didn't you just say that in the first place? It seems pretty well disproved, but I reserve judgement on that.

I'm also getting the impression that you don't understand what I'm referring to as far as the science goes, because repeating "rotational movement" over and over isn't describing anything. I am open to being proven wrong.

If you want to ignore the actual physical laws as they are written or not answer any basic inquiries into this theory that you espouse, that's up to you. I'll cede the floor to those who hold no skepticism towards these claims so you can have a satisfying discussion.

For other posters: Here are some websites on the Electric Universe Theory in case you don't know what it is and want to read about it.

http://www.electricuniverse.info/Ele...niverse_theory
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 06-28-2014, 09:14 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by rahu View Post

Most of us have dealt with a flat bike tire. And while fixing it, surely we have all noticed that if one spins the wheel in your hands, the tire exerts a right angle force that allows one to support the tire on one finger. As long as the wheel spins it will remain horizontal and spin around the remaining finger. The rotation creates a force that holds the axles level. But if you want to stop the wheel from revolving around you finger, one must gasp both ends of the wheel axle and hold it steady.
Any rotating body that has mass creates these forces, by Newton’s laws of motion. the more massive the object, the greater the rotations force created. Every day we see the sun go across the sky and the seasons come and go with the steady, fixed orientation of the rotations axis of the earth. The problem is that for these constant movements of the earth to exist, there must be forces that hold the axis steady. If one places a rotating object in a vacuum, it will tumble thru space.
The spontaneous response is Gravity is doing it is keeping the axis fixed in place.. But that is not even close. Gravity is said to result in the planets motion around the sun, but the rotation of the planets have nothing to do with gravity.
No one knows why the planets are revolving. gravity didn’t do it.
So we all feel the steady motion of the earth, but for this to be. there must be a exterior force holding the earth’s axis steady.

Yet ,unbelievably, Science has no answer, in fact Science does not even ask the question. Because the answer must be hidden to conceal the secret of the black magician powers .

The only explanation ever given was an nebulous statement by Ernst mach. He said the every star in the universe is “holding” the axis’s ,of all the planets and stars in the universe, steady.
This is pure conjecture; it has no connection to any known forces. But Einstein coined the term the “mach affect”. But you will be hard pressed to find this in any scientific book .

So the question remains unanswered, what holds the rotational axis of the earth fixed.
Such a big omission in the standard model is hard to comprehend.
This is an example of the Mirrors of Science. One can not believe that science does not have a answer but they do not..
I didn’t figure this out , I read a paper http://teslasociety.com/biography.htm


in this article he calculated the immense rotational forces existing from the earth’s rotation. And then pointed out that scientist ignore this conundrum.
I had to read the article 2-3 times before I realized the simplicity of the scientific omission, he had pointed out.
So science is in fact concealing the most primal dynamics in our world.

Emmnuael velikovsky pointed out the missing celestial dynamic:the electrical fields of the planets and stars.
http://velikovsky.org/en/velikovsky.html
http://varchive.org/




the rotation energies of all the planets and stars is totally ignored by science. there is enough rotational energy existant to provide the missing dark energy. but scientist do not want to focus on a source of free energy, so they come jup with yet another hypothetic energy .


Emmanuel velikovsky pointed out the missing celestial dynamic: the electrical fields of the planets and stars. His theories have been validated with by space probes thru the years, yet the “itelligentsia” , dismisses his work.understanably as he overturns, newton ,Darwin, Einstein and shows the intellectual blind spots of archeology and history. Velikovsky single handedly disclosed the falscity and manipulation of the archeological/historical records.
the magnetic fields of the planets and sun are the forces that orders the universe, just as electrical fields order the world of atoms and sub atomic particle. The affect produced on light by a “gravitation” field and on light produced by an electromagnetic field cannot be distinguished. Both are defined by inverse square mathematical equations I have emphasized repeatedly the glaring omission of scientist to look at the causes for the stability of the earth axis. clearly the editors of history do not want this dynamic included in modern scientific theories as this would reveal the true source of the energies underlying our reality.
It may seem like a simple matter, but recent discoveries are beginning to show the true strength of the rotation of the earth.
The alternating current of our electrical system was called, by it’s inventor.nikolai tesla, a rotating magnetic field system. it is the rotation of the earth that gives the electrical force. Scientist had recently noted that relativistic particles are generated in the van Allen belts. At first scientist thought these near light speed particles had to have come from beyond the solar system. Then recently they noted that these particles were being accelerated in the van allen belt. The problem was where was the van allen belt getting the immense energy to raise these particles to near light speed.
Now they have found out that the magnetic field of the earth’ rotation is the force accelerating these relativistic particles. No scientist thought that the earth’s relatively slow rotation speed could cause these charged particles to form. Yet that is exactly what is happening. they have come up with new theories but still where the energy is coming from eludes them.
The affects Einstein gives to gravity are illusionary, a singularity is illusionary ,black holes are illusionary just as steph hawkens, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-9085016.html
the dean of black holes has determined. Gravity is a mathematical mirror to hide the power of the electromagnetic fields of the earth and sun.
I have emphasized repeatedly the glaring omission of scientist to look at the causes for the stability of the earth axis. clearly the editors of history do not want this dynamic included in modern scientific theories as this would reveal the true source of the energies underlying our reality.
It may seem like a simple matter, but recent discoveries are beginning to show the true strength of the rotation of the earth.

rahu
the earth’s rotation creates a gyroscopic affect. The earth should be tumbling in it’s orbit because of the gyroscopic affect.to keep the axis of rotation stable,such as aligned to the north start, the axis must be secured.
The earth’s axis is fixed, some force must be being exerted on the earth’s poles for this stability to exist. This is the missing force that science does not identify, in fact science does not even ask the question of what stabilizes the earth’s axis. Without the axis being stable we would have not season, we would have no set period of sun rise and sunset, life as we know it could not evolve in such a chaotic situation
The easiest way to comprehend this is to see these forces in action.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJWIl4MYMbw&list=PLmTxBRsvYE1pOSK5N4byEJnY 4M6-8kaQz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbdrqpXb-fY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ty9QSiVC2g0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4YlDH_yRjA

rahu
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 06-30-2014, 08:44 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJWIl4MYMbw&list=PLmTxBRsvYE1pOSK5N4byEJnY 4M6-8kaQz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbdrqpXb-fY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ty9QSiVC2g0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4YlDH_yRjA


A picture is worth a thousand words they say, here is really helps because it still seems so strange the way simple rotational motion can create these forces.
What is not mentioned in these videos is that in space, with nothing securing the wheel, the wheel would tumble around. the videos all show one axle supported. this shows the motion, but to stop the motion two hands would have to be used to stop the gyroscopic motions.
These forces are immense. The mass of the earth isis estimated to be 6 sextillion, 588 quintillion short tons (6.6 sextillion short tons) or 5.97 1024 kilograms, with the Earth's mean density being 5.515 times that of water (the standard).
at the equator the speed of the earth rotation is approximately 1000 mph
Earth's rotational velocity is approximately 1,674.4 km
what force is counteracting these powers. Whose hands are holding the axis toward the pole star?
Actually the only place I have read about this astronomical ommission was in a watch tower magazine years ago. The article claimed that this prove god existence because science had not explanation for the fixation of the axis(and still don’t).
My own prejudices were totally scientific when I first read the paper by Nikola Tesla
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/tesla
I could not conceptualize how there could be such great force unaccounted for by science.
After 2-3 readings it finally sank in when I remembered the bicycle wheel motions as a child.
The base of all the other lies of omission and Damned Lies of science follow this seminal mental/intellectual blindspot . or more correctly this cultural program by the editors of history.

rahu
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 07-01-2014, 07:48 PM
Phil's Avatar
Phil Phil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 182
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Come on planets rotate because of the contraction of the original nebulous material. A slight movement causes appreciable rotation as it contracts from hundreds of light years inward.

Velikovsky? A one man show?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 07-01-2014, 11:51 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

unfortunately phil you don't know what you are talking about. the rotation of the planets is one of the problems with the accreation theory.
https://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...etion%20theory
your are scientifically wrong. Gravity can not produce the rotation of the planets that fact is not even debated by the scientist, it is unexplained like many facts of reality that do not fit the standard model. for that matter , the accreadion theory works very well for the inmner rocky planets,except venus , and except for mercury's slight rotation, but there is no way to tweak the accreation theory to account for the gas giants. the only theories on these planets all postulate outside influences on these.
rahu
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 07-02-2014, 06:17 AM
Phil's Avatar
Phil Phil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 182
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

If I am wrong, apparently I am in good company...

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/que...php?number=416

Quote:
Anyway, the bottom line is that stars like the Sun spin from the original angular momentum that was there in the solar nebula from which it formed. Not only that, all orbital motion of the planets (including the spin) is due to this orginal angular momentum.
Quote:
4.54 billion years ago, our Solar System formed within a cloud of hydrogen not unlike the Orion Nebula, or the Eagle Nebula, with its awesome pillars of creation. Then, it took some kick, like from the shockwave from a nearby supernova, and this set a region of the cold gas falling inward through its mutual gravity. As it collapsed, the cloud began to spin.
But why?
It’s the conservation of angular momentum.

Think about the individual atoms in the cloud of hydrogen. Each particle has its own momentum as it drifts through the void. As these atoms glom onto one another with gravity, they need to average out their momentum. It might be possible to average out perfectly to zero, but it’s really really unlikely.
Which means, there will be some left over. Like a figure skater pulling in her arms to spin more rapidly, the collapsing proto-Solar System with its averaged out particle momentum began to spin faster and faster.
This is the conservation of angular momentum at work.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 07-02-2014, 05:08 PM
Flapjacks's Avatar
Flapjacks Flapjacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 953
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

He thinks that there is a force holding the planets "steady" during rotation, not that rotation itself isn't explained (I think -- I hope).

For instance, the ice skater is holding herself upright while spinning, but if she was in space, how would her spinning behavior look? Would her axis of rotation remain upright as it does when she is standing on the Earth? I think that is what he wants to address. We can say gravity is responsible for holding her upright on Earth (well, her counteraction of gravity and normal force), but not in space. Would her axis of rotation change without those forces that hold her up?

I believe it has to do with the torque -- like it says in the videos, force is a vector (so it has a direction as well as magnitude) so if a torque is applied, there is an axis of rotation generated from that particular torque. To use linear motion as an analogy: if you apply a force to an object and it travels through space in a particular direction, without the influence of any other forces, would you expect that object to change direction spontaneously? That is basically what rahu is suggesting... that the direction (axis) of motion would change without a force (torque?) to "hold it" in place, which is ultimately nonsensical in terms of physical laws.

But it gets confusing. Like I said... it would be nice to see better integration between angular and linear motion. They are treated a separate behaviors to describe them, which is odd because motion is motion. Why are there two different "kinds" that have the same rules but respond differently to them? I think it's a failure of the model, really. But I'm not smart enough to come up with a resolution.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 07-02-2014, 07:58 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

both of my antagonist have made my initial point. science ignores the kinetic energy caused by the earths rotation, and science ignores the rotation of the planets and sun when formulating the accreation theory. science does not want to explain how the earth axis is steadied. or the planets and stars. just to keep my critics mind on point, the orbital rotation of the planets are accounted for in the accreation theory. not the rotation around the axis.
you have both show gross error so until you read up on the subject, I don't see any need to respond. one can not debate the ignorant.

rahu
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Unread 07-03-2014, 06:36 AM
Phil's Avatar
Phil Phil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 182
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

And I feel no need to debate further with someone who calls those with another opinion ignorant. Name calling is a sign of weakness.



P.S. If you have guts, go and present your ideas in this forum:

http://cosmoquest.org/forum/

in the Against The Mainstream subforum. Good Luck...

Last edited by Phil; 07-03-2014 at 06:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Phil For This Useful Post:
Birch Dragon (07-03-2014), Flapjacks (07-03-2014)
  #16  
Unread 07-03-2014, 05:25 PM
Flapjacks's Avatar
Flapjacks Flapjacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 953
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
And I feel no need to debate further with someone who calls those with another opinion ignorant. Name calling is a sign of weakness.



P.S. If you have guts, go and present your ideas in this forum:

http://cosmoquest.org/forum/

in the Against The Mainstream subforum. Good Luck...
Makes me sad because this could have been an interesting discussion. Maybe we should make a Tesla and fringe physics theories thread.

Although that might devolve into vicious debates about free energy.

EDIT: Oh wait, there is one, and rahu crashed it, and maybe where this one was inspired?: http://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum...ighlight=tesla

Resurrection time!

Last edited by Flapjacks; 07-03-2014 at 05:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Unread 07-03-2014, 11:08 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science


The Standard Model promulgated by the scientific establishment is by definition material/mechanical.
When velikovsky talked to Einstein about the ignored influence of the electromagnetic fields of the planets, Einstein replied that the influences did not need to be included because the mechanical theory exactly predicted reality, so it was not needed.
This is so myopic that there must be another reason for the omission of the planets magnetic fields .
For instance gravity bends light. This has been observed during total eclipses. The red shift in light is used to determine the distance of stellar objects and their age and direction.
Yet electromagnetism also bends light. An astronomer cannot tell the difference between light bent by electromagnetism or gravity because both have the same basic formula’s. both are a function of a inverse/square calculations.
Astronomers have seen magnetic fields over 500 million light years long, but do not know how these exist. So when a astronomers reports a red shift ,they don’t know if it is a function solely of gravity. The light could have passed through a intense magnetic field in space. Of course scientist totally disregard electromagnetism of the stellar objects.

So the question is why does science ignore the forces such as the gyroscopic forces created by the earth’s rotation? Because the energy of the earth’s rotation could be harnessed for all to use and therefore bypass the greed of capitalism.
j.p. morgon financed a electrical tower ,designed by nikola tesla at the turn of the century. This tower would have provided electricity to all of Manhattan island with out wires.
http://www.teslasociety.com/teslashorelab.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTjYHnpJjEE
http://www.nikolateslasecret.com/index.php

When 90 % complete, morgan pulled the plug and had the tower taken down. why? depends on the book you read, but it is said that morgan realized there would be no way to tell how much energy was being used and therefore it would be impossible to charge for it. my feeling is that he realized that all his copper ore holdings would lose their value ,if copper wasn’t needed to transmit the electricity. Remember J.P.Morgan was one the great robber barons of the era.
It has been proven over and over that the earth’s magnetic field can be tapped for free electrical power.
So sciences blind eye is really a suppression of knowledge. If the scientist don’t talk about the earth’s rotation then no one will think about the existence of this immense electrical field. clearly this is not a blindspot in science but a conscious ommision so that the people of the earth have no alternative but to patronize the corrupt energy corporations as they ravage the earth in their greed.
tesla had written simple explanations of this revolutionary motor in lectures that were presented in 1887.
at this time, the label was the “rotary magnetic field motor” .science has labeled this the alternating current motor or the AC electrical system. Note how even here the reference to the rotation magnetic field description has been edited to remove this concept from tesla’s discoveries.

tesla invented the ac system. said he saw electricity differently from the science of his age.

tesla died destitute in a skidrow apartment in new york in 1943 with rats eating his body when the authorities arrived. quickly the fbi took position of the scene and moved thousands of tesla’s top secret documents to be studied.

tesla demise and the virulent cultural attacks on him are notorious and many books have been written about this.
to complete that suppression of his world peace and free power ideas, he entered pop culture as the archetype of the mad evil scientist. the first appearance in comic books of this archetype was actually named tesla. The editors of history want to erase any mention of the electrical potential of the earth’s rotation.

This is the bottom line to science’s omission of the electromagnetic potential of the earth’s magnetic field.
The reason no mention is made of the gyroscopic affect of the earth is because once it is acknowledged, then the force which holds the gyroscopic axis steady would have to be identified… that is the power of the electromagnetic field of the earth . so science plays dumb.
Science is not a objective truth. Science has always been used to promote greed and war. Any positive effects of the use of science are incidental to the primary promotion of war and greed .
for instance , the conquering of malaria is said to be a great success of modern science. Yet the only reason malaria was “conquered” was so that the European powers could rape the African continent, and they western powers continue to destroy Africa to this day.
and malaria is still a problem but no new vaccines are being developed because malaria is a disease of the destitute in Africa. There is no economic incentives for the pharma/corps.

rahu
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rahu For This Useful Post:
Flapjacks (07-04-2014)
  #18  
Unread 07-04-2014, 01:45 AM
Flapjacks's Avatar
Flapjacks Flapjacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 953
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Ok, I'm getting a clearer picture now of what your frame of reference is for these arguments. Thank you rahu.

J. P. Morgan really f'ed up a lot of things, and it's nuts that there is still a bank around with his namesake and no one bats an eyelash. I mean, he wanted to help take over the US government.

I've read 3 books about Telsa... including his autobiography. It's hard to know why Wardenclyffe has never been followed up on. I've assumed it's mostly because nobody is smart enough to do it. But it's very possible that it's suppression of information. Or a bit of both.

I didn't realize you were relating the harnessing of electromagnetic energy from the Earth with this theory of the Electric Universe, because while Tesla is a credible scientist, Velikovsky is not (even if he inspired Einstein to revisit electromagnetism). So thank you for clarifying the relationship you were proposing between the two.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Unread 07-05-2014, 09:18 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Tesla invented the A/C(rotating magnetic field current) he worked with the “famous” Edison who never got out of the low amperage direct current.tesla was a genius with astral/psychic visionary abilities.
Tesla wtote all the patents on the ac system. He would see the mechanism he wanted in his mind. After visualizing the entire piece of apparatus in his mind, he went to a engineer and told him all the exact measurements and lengths, all the technical data to create the apparatus. nothing was written down before hand. It always worked perfectly. So he was not merely genius he was inspired as can also been be seen by his concern to give all people free energy from the earth’s rotating magnetic field and vehement his stand against wars.
In tesla’s natal chart ,using the 12:00 as given by astrodienst, the moon is conjunct the node and mars and square the sun.
The Neptune/Uranus midpoint is conjunct the south node and this is what gives he mystical/technical intuitions and with Neptune forming a the 2/11th harmonic with Uranus and each 1/11th harmonic to the south node, symbolizes his uuse of these visions and dreams with abilities of an Adept.
He always said that he saw electricity differently from the scientific models.for over a hundred years science could not duplicate his techniques to form what is called “ball lightning”, electric charge in a stable ball like structures. Tesla had picture of him sitting in his lab with the huge tesla coils creating balls of electric at tesla’s feet.

Tesla realized the earth was a huge capacitor with standing field waves.tesla noticed this when he would track thunderstorms as they slide off the rockies and traveled across the great plains. He had thought he signals would become weaker but he found there was the standing wave, as the thunderstorm’s radio signature would become strong again when it pasted through a earth’s electrical wave.
Every 8 minutes the earth is recharged. No one knows how, but recently scientist observed that every 8 minutes cylindrical packets of solar”wind” enter the ionsphere and penetrate it or these energy packets will travel laterally to some other point and then penetrate to the earths surface apparently.
Tesla creations allowed modern civilization to evolve so rapidly. Without the amperage tesla’s method gives, the high level of current needed by industry,net, etc, could not exist.
He was the genius and toast of the western world at the turn of the 20th century.
Yet he is the only scientist to point out this , the forces created by the earth rotation are being ignored by standard science.
The scientist Ernst Mach, best known for the measurement of the speed of sound as mach 1,2,3.. was consider a philosopher of science as well as an experimenter and he made a supposition that all the mass of all the stars in the universe were keeping getting the earth’s axis and those of other planets, steady. Of course this is simply words because it did not describe any mechanism for his relationship. No he did not mean gravity. In fact Einstein considered mach with respect . Einstein coined a term, ‘The Mach Effect” to describe mach’s musings.
this is where “Science “ has left the Omission. Acknowledged but unexplained.
No ,the ignorance of science does not fit this. This is the total ignoring of the basic astronomical rhythm that insure light through season of change and years ofconstant environment rhythms. Such ignorance,( like the ignorance of these trolls,) is a calculated move. One mark of a troll is that they at first deny the very fact you are presenting. And respond with ignorance (aka lies) . this is part of the same editors of history’s mindset to keep the true value of nodal astrology surrounded in philosophy.
With such a huge omission in dynamics of the real world, is it any wonder “Science” does not know where 90% of the universes mass and energy is?


rahu
Attached Images
File Type: jpg astro_2gw_1365_nikola_tesla_adb_67369_5900.jpg (87.2 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Unread 07-06-2014, 05:56 AM
Flapjacks's Avatar
Flapjacks Flapjacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 953
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

"Science" doesn't deny the magnetic field of the Earth (obviously) or the potential to tap it as an energy source, it seems:

http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/wtether.html

P.S. A troll is not a person that simply disagrees with you, or even asks you questions about what you think. I don't know about Phil, but initially I never disagreed with you but inquired further, and you took it upon yourself to be rude and dismissive. Perhaps someday you'll learn to treat other's respectfully, until then I'll ignore your disparaging and unjustified attacks because Jupiter in Pisces makes me all-too-forgiving. But, I'm done with this thread, thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Unread 07-06-2014, 10:02 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Tesla like every advocate of the earths rotation meant with ignoble ends.
By ignoring the forces of the earth’s rotation, 21st century science is essentially one the of the same 4th century bc ,materistic mindset as the Greeks. With no rotation of the earth, one does not have to be concerned with the rotation power of the earth.
on february 19 1600 the Italian monk gioradano bruno was burned alive because he believed that the earth rotates and revolves ,that is he believed in the astrologer Copernicus theories.
galileo got into trouble , the second time he was called to rome.
after the first visit,galileo apparently thought the "enlightened pope" who had been personal friends earlier in life, had ok'd a comparison with the final edge given to the established order. so he wrote the "dialogue concerning the two chief world systems”.

he gave a "scientific" explanation for the Copernican system. but to give the edge to the church, he used ,at the end, the energy of rotation of the earth causing the tides to swish around the meditterean sea.

for millenniums, people on the shores knew of the moon's affect on tides. so galileo gave an example of proof that was on it's face ridiculous to any scholar or fisherman


what was expected was a formal rejection of copernicus.

galileo got out of the inquisition with his life but he was branded a vehement suspect of heresy .


tesla punishment for mentioning the unmentionable was to have his money,fame and place in history stripped from his legacy. for instance tesla designed the first hydroelectric plant at Niagara falls. He john Westinghouse and tesla had a contract that paided tesla 1 dollar per horse power. But westihouse said the cost was too great ,so he had tesla void the original contract in anticipation of a revised amount. But once tesla voided the contract, Westinghouse started producing motors and never signed another contract with tesla.
Marconi used tesla patents to make his radios but neverpaid tesla.Westimghouse did the exact thing that Sarnoff did to philo farnsworth , the inventor of the TV,Sarnoff produced tvs under philos patents but paid nothing to philo til after their deaths. Just kept him in court for 40 years.
Strange how this scientific omission have existed for so long. But occult societies have long controlled civilization… and still do.

rahu
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Unread 07-08-2014, 04:41 AM
Flapjacks's Avatar
Flapjacks Flapjacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 953
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

I ran across this randomly today, which made me think of this thread, and so now I must post it:

http://exoplanets.co/extrasolar-plan...formation.html

Quote:
In the core accretion scenario the chunks of matter have to reach a minimum threshold mass for gravity to kick in enough for the chunk to start growing to become what is known as a planetesimal. However, that threshold is huge. Planetesimals have to have a size of hundreds to thousands of kilometers before their mutual gravity becomes strong enough to start growing into a planet. While it is easy to get meteorite-sized objects from the coagulation of tiny dust grains and the like, once you get to boulders that are around a meter large in size, you hit a showstopper. As you know, boulders do not stick together with their own gravity. What's worse is that these boulders are theorized to be in a highly turbulent environment, traveling at very high speeds relative to each other. When these boulders collide, again as you would expect from common sense, instead of sticking together, they smash each other into smaller pieces. That's the exact opposite of what you need to build a planet. It is a showstopper.

Nobody has been able to think of a way for boulders to stick together at all. As a scientist, I find what happens next deeply disturbing. Researchers admit that the problem is severe but then they simply assume that somehow boulders did manage to stick together and then they proceed to develop a sophisticated theory of planet formation assuming that the critical mass was formed. There is no known mechanism to make boulders or kilometer-sized objects stick together and prevent them from smashing each other apart so it is almost like invoking some kind of magic. It is certainly true that if there does exist a large enough core, that core will accrete material and grow larger by means of gravity. However, if the foundation of planet-formation theory is an impossibility, why should one have any reason to believe that the theory on top of that foundation is a true description of what actually takes place?
This comes from, as far as I can tell, a reputable source. So, if this is true, then rahu is right; mainstream science has not explained why planets rotate.

POINT: rahu

Too bad this is rahu's thread but I'm providing the evidence for the claims...

EDIT: Also.... holy s***!

Last edited by Flapjacks; 07-08-2014 at 05:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flapjacks For This Useful Post:
Culpeper (04-08-2016)
  #23  
Unread 07-09-2014, 01:53 AM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Einstein is held to be one of the most important scientist of our age. But the truth is this is more cultural propaganda. Einstein was a plagiarist

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss/177-9381374-0719953?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=einstein+the+plagerist
and the editors of history have parlayed his plagiarism into a belief that Einstein created all his theories.
The facts are Einstein was an inept mathematician. After graduation from the university, his skills were so bad he could not even get employment as a tutor to high school students and therefore took a job as a patent officer second class.
Every element of his theory of relativity was lifted from other scholars. The concept of relativity goes back to the Greeks and Galileo already had wrote about relativity. In his work Galileo used a boat moving evenly along a body of water to show that one could not ascertain the motion of the boat when inside. This is the exact thought experiment made famous by Einstein, the only difference being Einstein used a railroad car moving at constant velocity instead of a boat.
The French theoretical physicist and polymath ,Henri Poincare read a paper before the French acadamie, about relativity 18 months before Einstein’s paper was published. Apologist for Einstein point out he could have not read that before he published his paper because the original was in French.
The mathematical equations used by Einstein , the Fournier equations were developed by Joseph Fourneir. Delta T or the variability of time near the speed of light was postulated by Hendrik Lorentz not Einstein. The equation E =MC2 had been in the literature for 4 years before Einstein claimed it as his own . the concept of a time/space continuum was not his, and at first he rejected the concept.
There is not one concept that was original in the theory of revelativity.
Einstein was a unabashed plagiarist. Scientific works are always based on previous knowledge. When a paper is submitted the author lists those scientist whose work he built on. But Einstein published his theory without giving any of his predecessors work credit. He claimed all the idea were his by mentioning NO scientist before him.. henrik Lorentz was one of the most abused, as Einstein had corresponded extensively with Lorentz, yet claimed delta T as his. There was an uproar about these actions. And Lorentz continued trying to assert his primacy until he died.but the editors of history simply pushed Einstein’s stolen theory.
Of course we have been programmed by the editors of history to regard Einstein as a savant .this is an integral part of the fraud of science.
didn’t Einstein get the nobel prize for this theory of relativity? Actually the answer is no. Einstein never was awarded the nobel prize for his theory of relativity because this action would have been objected to by all the famous scientist Einstein plagiarized, beginning with hendrik Lorentz.
Einstein was given a nobel prize for this work on Brownian movement.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/81815/Brownian-motion

Einstein apologist have said that ,though he didn’t create the theory, he was the one you brought all the different elements together. Is a specious argument because relativity is a flawed theory. Scientist know this but continue to fraudulently claim relativity as a true theory.
Robert Laughlin was awarded a nobel prize in 1994.
His book different universe goes into quantum theory. The book describes the ways quantum mechanics has changed the world of theoretical physics.
he also decribes the social milieu of the world of physics and he reveals a few secrets that are generally kept under wraps from the layman.
Most notaby, experiments have shown that the theory of relativity is wrong .
For instance every time you use your cell phone or laptop or any appliance that uses silicon chips, you are proving Einstein’s relativity to be false.
one reason is that according to Einstein the vacuum of space is empty. Space must be empty for the effects of relativity to accumulate over space and time.
Yetcieintist have known for years that space is not empty. Space is best described as a phase change.
A phase change is when a molecule takes on different physical characteristic.
Water is fluid at normal temperatures but under 32F, water turns into a different phase, namely ice which has totally different characteristics than water. And when water is raised above 212F, it change to a gas. steam, which has physical properties different from the first two phases.
The temperature of these phases changes of water can be changed through manipulations of pressure and temperature, but it does not stop phases changes of water.
It turns out that space is a phase change of matter. Scientist have for decades built cloud chambers and have seen that in a perfect vacuum, sub atomic particles spontaneously appear and disappear. Space is not empty, it is dynamic. This refutes Einstein because relativity demands that space be empty because the fabric of the time space continuums must be empty for the effects of relativity to accumulate .
Yet though it is known space has an “ether” and is not empty, they conveniently ignore this phenomenon because it disproves Einstein. Einstein’s dogma is retained. Any physicist that challenges Einstein will find themselves without a job. It has nothing to do with scientific facts. as Laughlin says, science is based on who is providing the money for research. There is no scientific objectivity.
When you switch on your cell phone, the silicon chips give up electrons to the electron flow that science believes is electricity. But the reason silicon is so good for electron flows is that when the electron leaves it position in the lattice, a dimple in the time/space fabric appears. Unbelievably there is a “dimple” in the space the electron jump from.
This dimple also disproves relativity because, again, relativity demands that the warp of space be uniform. Space cannot have a preconceived shape. that is the a dimple cannot exist in the fabric because then the accumulated affect of relativity cannot operate. but dimples do come into existence every time you use a electronic device with silicon chips.
Even more damaging to relativity is the fact that the “dimple” has positive charge. This is disproves relativity because according to relativity, a charge is directly related to the bond length of the electron. but there is no electron and there is no bond length, yet the dimple moves and act exactly like an electron. So silicon gives up an electron and a invisible charge positron that acts like an electron, all of which is impossible according to relativity of Einstein. Laughlin comments that he is going to upset some theoretical physicist because these facts are censored from the public. Why? Because they disprove Einstein .
I hope the trolls stop flapping their jaws and read this book. It shows the fraud of science first hand.
Another problem with science is that though scientist claim they know how the universe is works, they don’t.
A long standing criticism is that science just formulates mathematical models to accommodate the facts of reality.
The recent discovery of the hogg bison particle is a perfect example. After the experiments at the large haldron collider, the scientist were quick to say this proved everything in the standard model was correct(of course the standard model does not include an explanation of electron magnetism). As they patted themselves on the shoulder as they received the nobel prize for creating a debris field in which they say the remnant of the boggs bison particle could be discerned … or so they claimed. But now after a peer review, it turns out the “discovery of the bogg bison particle did not explain the universe. Rather the picture becomes more clouded because the data from the large hadron collider showed that after the bogg bison expanded the universe, the universe should have collapsed immediately. So nothing was proved at all except 11 billion dollars(the cost of the collider) will buy a nobel prize.

This is the ongoing refutation of science. Science does not know how the universe works at all. What the scientist do is formulate mathematical equations that encompass the current data.
Laughlin makes the point that no constant in physics has ever been predicted from theory. Science only measures but cannot predict their value, i.e. the value of an electron’s charge for instance.
Stephen hawking in A brief History of Time , acknowledges this as a valid criticism of physics.
For instance about the electrons charge , he says they could calculate what the electron charge would be,but the mathematics are so complex, they could never prove if the answer was correct or not…. So they just measure for these constsants.
Hawking,whose fame began with his work on singularities, or black holes, now does not believe singularities actually exist. And by implication he does not accept relativity because black holes spring from the theory of relativity.
rahu
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Unread 07-09-2014, 03:09 AM
Flapjacks's Avatar
Flapjacks Flapjacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 953
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by rahu View Post
This is the ongoing refutation of science. Science does not know how the universe works at all. What the scientist do is formulate mathematical equations that encompass the current data.
Laughlin makes the point that no constant in physics has ever been predicted from theory. Science only measures but cannot predict their value, i.e. the value of an electron’s charge for instance.
Stephen hawking in A brief History of Time , acknowledges this as a valid criticism of physics.
For instance about the electrons charge , he says they could calculate what the electron charge would be,but the mathematics are so complex, they could never prove if the answer was correct or not…. So they just measure for these constsants.
Hawking,whose fame began with his work on singularities, or black holes, now does not believe singularities actually exist. And by implication he does not accept relativity because black holes spring from the theory of relativity.
rahu

Thinking about black holes is what lead me to that link I posted above about accretion.

I don't understand why physicists decided to take an inverse proportionality literally to come up with black holes. Applying infinity to an object makes no sense and is something we never see in nature, and imo, should be regarded as due to limited information and a simplistic interpretation of relationships between variables. Believing in "the maths" for it's own sake is no longer using science as a tool for inquiry, and you see a LOT of that going on when talking about black holes.

What do you think of Ilya Prigogine's ideas? Have you heard of him?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Unread 07-09-2014, 11:43 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Tesla,Velikovsky and the Fraud of Science

Science has never been used for the general good. It has always been a tool of wars and greed. From Aristotle on, ”scientist” have paid their way by creating machines of war.
Aristole designed machines to sink and disable war ships. One such machine was a set of counter balanced “claws” that were underneath the wharf. When a hostile ship landed at the wharf, the huge claws would rise from the harbor and pull the ship down.
Another was a huge counter balanced “spear” underneath the sea that was set off when a ship hit it. The “spear would penetrate the hull and sink it. It is not known whether these were ever deployed but Aristotle’s designs were recorded.
Aristotle was in the hire of Philip of Macedonia and Alexander the great was his student. Alexander was able to conquer the known world because he used the “scientific” knowledge learned at Aristotle’s feet.
For instance when Alexander encounter tyre, a walled city off the coast of Lebanon, he cut down a forest or some say tore town a city, to built a “mole” or causeway to reach the city. Tyre had stood for a 100o years but no one had tried to build a bridge over the sea to the city.
Alexander accomplished this and ransacked the city. Alexander also showed he felt he was a demigod himself because the royal tyrian family went into the temple of Jupiter for sanctuary when Alexander invaded the city. But against all customs, Alexander killed the royal family inside the temple of Jupiter.
Another example of Alexander’s use of Aristotle’s science occurred when he was in the Parthian mountains. A belligerent tribe was situated on a high steep hill which was accessible only by a narrow path that wound around the hill. Since only two abreast could climb to the city, Alexander’s superior forces were neutralized. So Alexander had his engineers build a bridge from the nearest hill. After 2 months he was able to gain access and decimated his foes.
Alexander did what no other conqueror had done before because he embrace the scientific knowledge bestowed by Aristotle.
Da Vinci left many plans for war machines for his sponsors. Galileo was an expert at hydraulics and was commissioned to block rivers and alter river beds into moats that surrounded besieged cities .
Even Einstein who has be portrayed as a pacifist, wrote to FDR and convince him of the feasibility of a atom bombs. The editors of history like to say that he told FDR this weapon would save live in the assault on japan. But the truth was Einstein wrote to FDR before the second world war even began, during a time when there was overwhelming sentiment against intervening in a foreign war. It is likely that FDR commissioned the Bomb because he had secret plans to enter the European war as was alleged by many members of congress. History shows they were correct. As a consequence of Einstein’s actions, theoretical physics, such as quantum mechaniocs were set back 30 years because from that point on the government would fund only physic research involving war machines .
So the propaganda of science for the benefit of mankind is not born out by history.

rahu

ps before I am taken to task by the scientists, I suggest two books
Forbidden archeology
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_no...%20aracheology
earth in upheaval
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss...ripbooks%2C286
both show concrete censorship by the scientific establishment
well it is more like ignore and don't publish finding contrary to the accepted dogmas
rahu


Last edited by rahu; 07-16-2014 at 01:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005-2018, AstrologyWeekly.com. Boards' structure and all posts are property of AstrologyWeekly.com and their respective creators. No part of the messages sent on these boards may be copied without their owners' explicit consent.