I understand that you were giving an example.
Please don't take what is intended as a comment as a criticism.
There are many things that can show "empathy". That's the trick in chart interpretation, to find those things, even though no cookbook mentions them.
When we say (as an example) that a combust Mercury indicates a poor listener, we are promoting a cookbook approach to chart interpretation. Yes, I agree that the possibility is there...a combust Mercury may be one indication of "poor listening." But it is insufficient and not a reliable indicator in and of itself,
We can look at many threads in this forum, such as:
"Aspects indicating people who don't listen"
"Which aspects show lesbianism"
"Depression in the horoscope".....
And what we see over and over is the "cookbook mentality" which attempts to ascribe certain characteristics to specific aspects or positions. I am simply trying to point out that this approach to chart interpretation is simplistic, reductionist, and myopic...and doesn't work very well.
I recently posted to the thread titled "I hate my birth chart." (I was not happy with myself due to the harshness of the post... but, that notwithstanding, I think it is a positive contribution). I first referred to experts in psychiatry to provide a definition (symptoms of) of the psychopathic personality. I then found that the chart as a whole showed that these symptoms, all of them, were present in the chart. This does not involve "looking for" indicators of psychopathy in the chart, but rather in understanding and realizing that the chart does in fact contain a constellation of indications (character traits) that as a whole point toward the condition. This approach to astrology demands that the astrologer be aware of the constellation of symptoms that constitute any given condition and that the diagnosis of that condition results from a thorough reading of the chart as a whole first, rather than seeking to diagnose a condition based on one or a couple of supposed indicators, a method that gives very questionable results in most cases.
I have Venus trine Jupiter in my own chart. Read any cookbook description of this aspect. Nothing of what the books say is true of my life. The reasons for this are quite clear in my chart-as-a-whole, but no textbook on astrology will explain this anomaly...the student would read the cookbook and make pronouncements about my life that are simply not true, not pertinent, not useful. That is the problem with the "Which aspects indicate _x___?" approach; it doesn't really work. There are too many exceptions to the rule, too many modifying factors.
Please don't take what is intended as a comment as a criticism.
There are many things that can show "empathy". That's the trick in chart interpretation, to find those things, even though no cookbook mentions them.
When we say (as an example) that a combust Mercury indicates a poor listener, we are promoting a cookbook approach to chart interpretation. Yes, I agree that the possibility is there...a combust Mercury may be one indication of "poor listening." But it is insufficient and not a reliable indicator in and of itself,
We can look at many threads in this forum, such as:
"Aspects indicating people who don't listen"
"Which aspects show lesbianism"
"Depression in the horoscope".....
And what we see over and over is the "cookbook mentality" which attempts to ascribe certain characteristics to specific aspects or positions. I am simply trying to point out that this approach to chart interpretation is simplistic, reductionist, and myopic...and doesn't work very well.
I recently posted to the thread titled "I hate my birth chart." (I was not happy with myself due to the harshness of the post... but, that notwithstanding, I think it is a positive contribution). I first referred to experts in psychiatry to provide a definition (symptoms of) of the psychopathic personality. I then found that the chart as a whole showed that these symptoms, all of them, were present in the chart. This does not involve "looking for" indicators of psychopathy in the chart, but rather in understanding and realizing that the chart does in fact contain a constellation of indications (character traits) that as a whole point toward the condition. This approach to astrology demands that the astrologer be aware of the constellation of symptoms that constitute any given condition and that the diagnosis of that condition results from a thorough reading of the chart as a whole first, rather than seeking to diagnose a condition based on one or a couple of supposed indicators, a method that gives very questionable results in most cases.
I have Venus trine Jupiter in my own chart. Read any cookbook description of this aspect. Nothing of what the books say is true of my life. The reasons for this are quite clear in my chart-as-a-whole, but no textbook on astrology will explain this anomaly...the student would read the cookbook and make pronouncements about my life that are simply not true, not pertinent, not useful. That is the problem with the "Which aspects indicate _x___?" approach; it doesn't really work. There are too many exceptions to the rule, too many modifying factors.
Last edited: