david starling
Well-known member
So, I noticed that no one has tried to debunk this. I'll take it to mean that either you didn't bother watching it (in which case you're not really interested in getting to the bottom of things, so why demand proof from us?) or you watched it in its entirety and couldn't fault a single thing, because it was true. Either or.
It's a long one!
It's ALL HYPOTHETICAL. It's ALL THEORY.
I hope he's able to improve the machines to ELIMINATE POSSIBLE Election fraud.
But no widespread, significant fraud has been PROVEN in a court of law.
If you leave your house unlocked, someone COULD have gotten in. But, if you can't PROVE something was taken, you can't collect on theft insurance.
The logical fallacy that there HAD to have been widespread, result-changing fraud on an extraordinary scale is based on this statement of BELIEF, NOT FACT:
"There is NO WAY that Trump COULD HAVE POSSIBLY LOST in a FREE and FAIR ELECTION. PERIOD!"
There's no logical reason why he couldn't have lost. But if that's your AXIOM, as erroneous and illogical as it is, then you HAVE to believe that there HAD to have been an overwhelming amount of fraudulent activity on Biden's behalf. And NO ONE will EVER, be able to convince you otherwise.
Last edited: