Should Pluto be demoted as a planet in Astrology?

For Information:

In Palmistry, Pluto replaced "upper mount of Mars" because of similarity of Astrological Pluto. That area is frequently referred as "Mount of Pluto" in both "Western Scientific Palmistry" as well as "Indian Palmistry". I don't know exactly when this started, but in Indian Palmistry, I know it since early eighties.

It has similar attributes as transformation, destruction, regeneration. If important in palm, it makes someone calm as well as a worrier.

There are traditionalists who use Pluto and the other outers. Robert hand and Joseph Crane to name a few.

Vivian Robson also used Neptune and Uranus, he did not use Pluto. But then again Pluto was only discovered shortly before he died. Long before guys like Zoller and Hand came along Robson was the guy who really started traditional astrologies resurgence. Although he may have been ahead of his time.

I guess if you want to be literal theyd all be neo traditionalists. Then again if you want to be that literal any traditionalist who uses a computer to calculate charts wouldnt be a true traditionalist either.

My bad, Robson actually did use Pluto, albeit sporadically. He alludes to the fact that there hadnt been enough research on it during his time to fully know of its affects.

Pluto really, really works well in modern western astrology. I intend to use it regardless of whether astronomers classify it as a planet, dwarf planet, or Mickey Mouse.

I wish the outer planets moved faster though....

Bunraku said:

I wish the outer planets moved faster though....

Click to expand...

at least you are not complainging about fixed stars.. check out their movement rate

snickers

Bunraku said:

I wish the outer planets moved faster though....

Click to expand...

Why? You'd lose out on benefits of their positive transits. For example, transiting Pluto trine sun should be a time when someone can make positive profound changes in her life.