California Fires were Geo-Engineered

https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/alternative/2019/3656969.html

Is This Why They Put Aluminum in the Chemtrails and Mercury in the Vaccines ?… Then Add a Little 5G

(go to this site and watch the video...aluminum burns blue exactly like the bottom picture
i cant post the video because this web site is blocking and altering my post as i make it rahu)


https://youtu.be/xcUsutyTMOk?t=24


https://youtu.be/8vUbNv4LoOM


https://youtu.be/cTwHIjHodGk


The post Is this why THEY put Aluminum in the chemtrails and Mercury in the Vaccines ?… Then add a little 5G appeared first on Philosophers Stone.
https://youtu.be/xcUsutyTMOk




Source: http://www.philosophers-stone.co.uk/?p=26191

rahu said:

4787

https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/alternative/2018/3653299.html



Trees Turned Blue Then Exploded in Flames! CA Fires Witness Testimony!

New evidence coming in from witnesses from the fires in Paradise California and it’s shocking! One person who speaks on this video spent 50 hours trying to escape!
Here’s some of the things you’ll learn in this video.

Everything turned blue before exploding in flames! Trees turned blue and then exploded! Pictures of this shown in the video! You’ll also see a directed energy weapon (DEW) beam hitting a tree in the video.
All the cars this witness saw had bodies in them! What type of a weapon did this? One thing is sure, this weapon torched everything connected to power as well as cars attempting to flee! Anything with metal seems to be affected. There were people severely burned by the metal in their pants zippers! Power poles on fire with nothing burning around them! Trees fine but things connected to power or containing metal burst into flame! Seems like some type of a microwave weapon to me.

Click to expand...

PGE,the power utility in nrothen California has declared bankruptcy a few months ago because it is clear that a major source of the forest fires came from their equipment's. now PGE and agreeing that a second forest fire was also started by their equipment. the evidence of these fires being directly at the site of PGE's equipment is so overwhelming that they have admitted culpability without any further question. the reason is that by admitting their equipment oion the grown created some of these fires, the have effectively draw inquiry from the PGE/Rothschild orbiting micros wave accumulators that were the real cause of these fires.
the existence of these micro wave accumulators in geo centric orbit is being covered up.

rahu




The second video shows Debora Tavares’ interview with Jeff Rense in 2015 conclusively provides documented proof of premeditation of fire destruction of Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, in Northern California using microwave weaponry.

her video was long ago deleted and comments imade about her video have also beendeleted after her video was delted.. so I recap what the video was about...
she showed a series of email exchanges wit jeff rense who was a official inn a California state agency.. I don't quite remember which it was ... but tavares got him to admit that yes.. the rothschilds nd PGE in orbit huge dishes that were collecting solar radiation and converting ot to microswaves which were being sent down to PGE installations and added to the power grid .these collection stations were in san rosa and exactly at the center os the fires. yet surrounding properties were incinerated while none of the 3 companies involved in the micros collection were touched by the fire.
as said this video which showed the actual emails received from jeff rense have been deleted and all comments about this have been deleted,

so right now these mirrors are sending micros wave down to earth while you read this and no public mention has ever been made by the Rothschild controlled main stewam propagandist. the idea for orbiting mirrors was first suggest by Nazi scientist in ww2 and nazi scientist brought over illegally afterww2 are the source of this technology today.



http://beforeitsnews.com/paranormal/...o-2530821.html


California Fires: Laser Beams From The Sky – Be Warned – They Are In Full Swing!
What are the chances that 3 of the largest avionics military laser companies are located in the same exact area as the Santa Rosa, CA fires occurred, yet none got torched?
L-3 technologies, Keysight, AEG Industries and Sonoma Design Group are all in Santa Rosa and are held by some of the largest weapons manufactures in the world!
Additionally, over two weeks now, and no official ‘story‘ about how so many fires self ignited all at once in the middle of the dark of night.

5G, Pacific Gas and Electric? Climate Change w/ Diablo Winds? Are all being talked about but none come close to explain the hell fires that occurred and torched metal, glass, rubber, granite, etc. to the ground in minutes, yet left trees and other buildings in tact.
The second video shows Debora Tavares’ interview with Jeff Rense in 2015 conclusively provides documented proof of premeditation of fire destruction of Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, in Northern California using microwave weaponry.
Additionally, RFID trackers are being used to locate victims in the vaporized rubble that is left of former residences.
Part II will cover the logging companies efforts to provide massive fuel for West Coast forest fires using the hackn’ squirt tree destroying methods of the Fischer Brothers, of Levi Strauss Jeans and GAP Stores fame.
This is all part of Agenda 21, which we will show is in full swing directly after the fires.
https://youtu.be/RBLBAM-Vi3c

this video was published over 2years by Deborah Tavares .she confronts PGE and others.
show predicted the north cal fires fire exactly as they happen.
must see..

https://youtu.be/RGcvkAGCwFM


interestingly PGE is in cahoots with the Rothschilds. they already have in place space based solar collectors that turn the sunlight into microwaves which are then transmitted to collectors on earth. and guess where these microwave collectors are....Sevastopol California... ground zero of the wild fires.
these micro wave canbe aimed anywhere and the microwaves can cause fires and human deaths where ever thes are aimed.....again these are now operational theyare functioning and in orbit. so it is clear the southern California fires are being created by the same way the notrthern California fires were.




Thanks http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE FORGED PG&E EMAIL HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX).

For all other Deborah Tavares hoaxes (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, California Fires, Genocide), click here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...eborah-Tavares

THE HOAX: In the FORGED PG&E Email Hoax, Deborah Tavares claims to have obtained emails which effectively prove that PG&E (which she claims is owned by "The Rothschilds") caused the recent fires in California by beaming directed energy beams from satellites in space at Sebastopol, California. But, her claims about these emails are lies. They are FORGERIES.

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX (Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 11:10-20:00)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fb--FC_oQ (at 1:05-3:40)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As3d9NgDyk (at 27:20-30:10)

Pacific Gas & Electric ("PG&E") is a California electrical utility company. Over the next few years, PG&E is required by law to generate an increasingly higher and higher percentage of its electrical power without producing any carbon emissions. So, PG&E has increasingly resorted to wind, solar and thermal technology to generate electrical power.

But, PG&E's conventional, ground-based, solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours in good weather. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future, solar panels on satellites in space might be used to generate energy from the Sun 24 hours a day. These satellites might then beam the power to Earth in the form of laser beams or radio frequency beams. The power might then be received by rectennas at receptor stations on Earth and then converted to electricity for use by its customers.

WHAT PG&E ANNOUNCED IN 2009:
www.pge.com/en_US/small-medium-business/business-resource-center/energy-management-articles/energy-management-articles/past-articles/energy-from-outerspace.page?WT.mc_id=SMBNewsletter_email_20160811_phase_link-energy

Solaren is a private California company which has patented the technology described above. In 2009, PG&E entered into a contract with Solaren to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electrical power using this technology. Under the contract, Solaren would own, operate and control all its satellites, rectennas and all the receiver stations. Originally, Solaren promised to provide PG&E with finished electricity by 2016. But, it ran into financial problems and still has not provided any electricity to PG&E, even at this late date. The California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") approved the contract on the condition that no money from PG&E customers ever be used to develop this technology.

THE CONTRACT:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/30198977/n.../#.XJUcxVKFPIU
(at paragraphs 1-5)

https://www.afcea.org/content/space-...closer-reality
(at paragraphs 8, 9 & 10)

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/
(at the final two paragraphs)

https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7
(at the final two paragraphs)

Deborah Tavares lives in Sebastopol and has waged war against PG&E because of its "smart meters". So, when the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and the technology described above for starting those fires. But, there was a problem. The scientific and economic literature indicated that this technology did not yet exist to blame.

CURRENT SCIENTIFIC & ECONOMIC LITERATURE ON THIS TECHNOLOGY:
This technology will not be in use until the end of the decade. See the last 3 paragraphs and the final sentence here.
https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7

This technology did not exist in 2017. Beginning at the bottom of page 16 here.
https://space.nss.org/media/NSS-JOUR...olar-Power.pdf

This technology is not in use in 2019. See the last paragraph. https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower

This technology did not exist in 2018. See the FIRST and LAST paragraph here.
https://earthsky.org/earth/space-bas...ser-to-reality

This technology will not be in use until at least 2019. See page 62.
http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/...e_12-14-16.pdf

This technology did not exist in 2018. See the final paragraph.
http://www.alternative-energy-news.i...ls-into-orbit/

SO, TO REBUT ALL THOSE FACTS, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (some purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this directed energy beam technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to kill us all.

THE FORGERIES:

1. PUBLISHED EMAIL FORGERIES:
http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2...rn-california/

Afterwards, Deborah Tavares created more FORGED emails reflecting imaginary responses from imaginary experts to which Deborah Tavares allegedly forwarded her FORGED emails above. Not surprisingly, these imaginary experts agreed with Deborah Tavares that this beam technology already existed, that it has long been in use and that it could be used to kill us all.

2. TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES AT ABOUT 20% THROUGH THE TEXT HERE: http://smartmetersmurder.com/

3. THE FINAL TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 17:25-18:40)

Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created the very FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE "PROOF" that PG&E used this future energy beam technology to start the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.

THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THESE PUBLISHED EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:

1. Tavares did not know what "space weather" actually was (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). "Solar flares" on the surface of the Sun erupt about every 11 years or so. These solar flares extend millions of miles into space and emit extremely high amounts of radiation into space. This radiation is called "space weather" (like a "rain" or "storm" OF RADIATION in space). (It is the Earth's atmosphere which protects all life on Earth from this radiation.). The radiation emitted during such "space weather" is so powerful that it can damage or destroy electrical power transformers here on Earth if they are linked to earth-based solar panels. Such damage can result in power outages. That is why "space weather" would be of concern to PG&E. During "damaging space weather", PG&E has to protect its transformers linked to earth-based solar panels because some such transformers provide electrical power to nuclear power plants and to hospitals which cannot afford power outages for obvious reasons.

DEBORAH TAVARES' MISTAKE:

But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this. She mistakenly believed that "space weather" was WEATHER HERE ON EARTH (like drought and fire) which was artificially created and controlled by lasers, radio frequencies or microwaves beamed at the Earth from satellites IN SPACE (a stupid mistake that a REAL PG&E executive WOULD NOT MAKE).

HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:

In FORGING the phrase "...then have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS, AKA EARTHLINGS, FOR ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENSES RESULTING [FROM DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER]" in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares was referring to the adverse consequences of FIRES WHICH PG&E CAN BLAME ON ITS CUSTOMERS (not realizing that "damaging space weather" is actually radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the Sun every 11 years). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, the consequences resulting from "damaging space weather" is actually power outages, NOT FIRES! AND, PG&E CANNOT POSSIBLY BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS FOR ITS OWN POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN EVERY 11 YEARS. So, in creating this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E customers can NEVER be "blamed" for the "consequences" of "damaging space weather", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

2. Likewise, Deborah Tavares did not know the terms of PG&E's contract with Solaren (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). So, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E would never own, operate, manage or control any of Solaren's satellites, rectennas, receiving stations or have any say in how, when or where energy from Solaren's satellites in space would be directed. Instead, Solaren would be solely responsible for all of that. Under the contract, the only thing PG&E would ever do would be to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren was ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Under the contract, PG&E is simply a potential, future customer of Solaren. Nothing more. But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this.

HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:

So, in FORGING the sentence, "WE [referring to PG&E] have changed OUR receptor site from the Mojave desert (sic) to Sebastopol" in the 10:03 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that she was so important to PG&E that it actually "targeted" her in Sebastopol with radio frequency waves beamed from satellites in space in retaliation for her opposition to PG&E "smart meters". See PROOF here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 18:40-19:20). Are you kidding me?! What a narcissist!

Regardless, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E will never have any ability to aim Solaren's energy beams or to move Solaren's receptor stations from one place to another (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

Further, Deborah Tavares did not know that Solaren's actual rectennas or receptor site is in Fresno, hundreds of miles away from the Mojave Desert (something a REAL PG&E executive would know).

PROOF THAT FRESNO (NOT SEBASTOPOL) IS THE REAL RECEPTOR SITE:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/30198977/n...XIlKNlKFPIU(at
the 3rd paragraph)

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/
(at end of 2nd paragraph)

https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower
(at the 16th paragraph)

Moreover, Deborah Tavares did not know that such receiver rectennas at such receiver stations are up to six miles in diameter (which would make it obvious to every person living in Sebastopol if it had actually had been relocated there as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims).

Finally, a REAL PG&E executive would not refer to Solaren's receptor site as "OUR" receptor site, would know that Solaren's receptor station was in Fresno (not in the Mojave Desert) and would know that PG&E had no power or ability to change Solaren's receptor site. The foregoing stupid mistakes prove that this email is a forgery.

3. Use your own common sense. As to the 10:03 email above, how likely is it that a PG&E executive would open an email to the CPUC with a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of exactly how Solaren's technology worked? The CPUC had just approved of PG&E's use of Solaren's technology provided that PG&E never invested any of its customer's money to finance the project. The CPUC did not need a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of Solaren's technology in which PG&E played no part and could claim no credit. This "reminder" serves NO PURPOSE except to defraud and to set up the sentence that follows.

4. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would refer to PG&E's customers as "EARTHLINGS" in connection with an email about a "COVER UP" of "damaging space weather" which can cause nothing but power outages? How is it even possible for PG&E to cover up a power outage?

5. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would tell PG&E to have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS "AKA EARTHLINGS" FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF "DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES WHICH CANNOT POSSIBLY BE BLAMED ON PG&E CUSTOMERS? This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THE UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:

1. The sentence, "You as a California resident have every right to know what your 'public utilities' are doing with their (sic) 'RATE DOLLARS'", was not written by an expert, as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, no "rate dollars" from any PG&E customer has or will ever be used to finance the research and development of Solaren's technology (which will be financed, owned and operated solely by Solaren). Under the contract, PG&E would merely be a potential, future customer of Solaren and buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Again, no PG&E customer money will ever be used to develop Solaren's technology. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this when writing this FORGERY. That stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

2. The term, "EARTH, INC." in "comment ONE:" is a "signature" term ACTUALLY CREATED, COINED and REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=4uy...60.uVtaFybaRXU

3. The phrase, "very disturbing" in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares phrase.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=BO2...71.i3pL90_8tdA

4. The term, "FOIA", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=eO2...99.ntDizkRvUdQ

5. The term, "iceberg", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=0O2...99.RDgj6KM5rHk

6. The term, "footprints", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=Du6...99.UcKcf4ptzag

7. The term, "assessment", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=Se6...99.qaTj4TY5zhg

8. BOTH "comment ONE:" and "comment TWO:" contain hyphenated terms (" - "), a writing custom rare in today's world, suggesting that BOTH comment ONE and comment TWO were written by the same person, which of course, they were.

PG&E may actually be using laser or radio frequencies beamed from satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are FORGERIES!

ACTUAL CAUSE OF FIRES IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...acy-aficionado
https://newrepublic.com/minutes/150605/alleged-southern-california-arsonist-conspiracy-theorist
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cali...other-conspiracies_n_5b6dc69de4b0ae32af97e953
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-holy-fire-arson-suspsect-20180810-story.html

ACTUAL CAUSE OF FIRES IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND ELSEWHERE
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/20...a-trail-fires/
https://www.chicoer.com/2018/09/27/2-arrested-for-allegedly-setting-northern-california-fires/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...wildfire-in-northern-california-idUSKCN1BA0VL
https://www.kion546.com/news/2-arrested-for-allegedly-setting-northern-california-fires/799909817
http://www.capradio.org/articles/2018/08/23/san-francisco-man-arrested-for-deadly-klamathon-fire/
https://www.foxnews.com/us/arson-suspect-linked-to-5-of-californias-fires-officials-say
https://www.foxnews.com/us/the-latest-arrest-made-in-growing-california-wildfire
https://www.redding.com/story/news/...ted-friday-connection-arson-fires/1780261002/
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/17/cal...be-deadly-wildfires-despite-arson-arrest.html
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...r-allegedly-setting-northern-california-fires
https://www.sbsun.com/2017/08/24/ma...fires-in-highland-san-bernardino-is-arrested/
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Arson-Arrest-Charges-San-Bernardino-439032663.html
https://wtop.com/national/2018/07/the-latest-more-evacuations-as-fire-rages-near-yosemite/
https://www.ksbw.com/article/battling-18-blazes-california-may-face-worst-fire-season/22677894
https://people.com/crime/calif-man-sentenced-to-12-years-for-starting-wildfire/
https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-arrest-man-connection-california-wildfires/story?id=56830037
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/...ange-Cleveland-National-Forest-490374161.html
https://wildfiretoday.com/2019/02/1...ance-before-arrest-for-starting-clayton-fire/
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/26/us/cranston-fire-california-arson-arrest.html


OTHER FACTORS
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-envi...e-change-california-san-francisco-los-angeles
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/08/news-california-wildfire-arson-human-cause/
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea...lifornia-s-worst-wildfires-power-12294852.php
https://www.vox.com/2018/7/20/17582...rr-fire-california-cranston-ferguson-Colorado


FACT: Importantly, not a single arsonist above used a smart meter or a Directed Energy Beam from a satellite in space to commit his/her crime.


ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.

5253
[https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/alternative/2019/3656969.html

Is This Why They Put Aluminum in the Chemtrails and Mercury in the Vaccines ?… Then Add a Little 5G

(go to this site and watch the video...aluminum burns blue exactly like the bottom picture
i cant post the video because this web site is blocking and altering my post as i make it rahu)


https://youtu.be/xcUsutyTMOk?t=24


https://youtu.be/8vUbNv4LoOM


https://youtu.be/cTwHIjHodGk


The post Is this why THEY put Aluminum in the chemtrails and Mercury in the Vaccines ?… Then add a little 5G appeared first on Philosophers Stone.
https://youtu.be/xcUsutyTMOk






Source: http://www.philosophers-stone.co.uk/?p=26191

They indeed were geo-engineered using the DEW (directed energy weapons). Nice to see there are some woke people on this site.

As for vaccines carrying autism, that's true too, there are tons of undeniably true cases that prove it.

As for 5G, well I've realized 5G has been fake for a little over a month now and have gotten few who are woke to realize that while on the surface it appears that it's going to be one of their major extinction weapons, it actually isn't at all harmful and never will be.

What they claim is actually 5G has been out for a few weeks now, and yet it hasn't harmed anyone. If it did, it would be on the news the day it was released, as it's deadly effects would be instantaneous lol.


Honestly though it should have been obvious that the 5G that's out now wasn't going to ever be dangerous, as there have been countless verifications for human safety on the warning for 5G long before it was even released, I mean YEARS before and if I remember correctly, even DECADES earlier.

Now of course you could always argue that those could just be lies, and they could just make it dangerous anyways, which is true, but if we take into account the elite agenda, which has been an obvious agenda for decades now, it would be obvious making any WIFI harmful to humans was never within their plans and never will be.

Seeing as 5G isn't dangerous and never will be, any youtuber claiming 5G is dangerous is most likely a gatekeeper/shill, which is a term used by the woke youtube community for youtubers who
spread 95% truth and 5% lies in their videos, which is because they are secretly working with the government.

Of course, spreading that much more truth than lies makes it very hard and for some impossible to see that they are always doing this, at least when only the surface is viewed of these youtubers.

But dig deeper and the evidence is very convincing. Not only does this ratio that these youtubers keep between truth and lies ALWAYS stand true, but some of these agents have gone so far as to flash the illuminati hand sign or emblem in their videos, essentially confirming the idea that they are indeed gatekeepers and are working with the enemy.

Chemtrails are also not dangerous, however many gatekeepers have brainwashed the truth seeking woke community into thinking otherwise.

If chemtrails were, then even one minute of inhaling the chemicals would leave millions sick within seconds lol. Chemtrails are supposedly used all over America, although I am not sure if this is even true, for all we know they target random cities or random states, or perhaps they spray them in every city in the entire world. No one really knows.

Either way, one thing is for sure, chemtrails ARE an issue, as their true purpose is to create artificial clouds to block the sun as well as to block the moon, as they are doing many projects with our sun and moon, also they use the chemtrails to mess with the atmosphere, which changes the weather. I don't know exactly why they mess with the weather though.

rahu said:

[https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/alternative/2019/3656969.html

Is This Why They Put Aluminum in the Chemtrails and Mercury in the Vaccines ?… Then Add a Little 5G

(go to this site and watch the video...aluminum burns blue exactly like the bottom picture
i cant post the video because this web site is blocking and altering my post as i make it rahu)


https://youtu.be/xcUsutyTMOk?t=24


https://youtu.be/8vUbNv4LoOM


https://youtu.be/cTwHIjHodGk


The post Is this why THEY put Aluminum in the chemtrails and Mercury in the Vaccines ?… Then add a little 5G appeared first on Philosophers Stone.
https://youtu.be/xcUsutyTMOk

Source: http://www.philosophers-stone.co.uk/?p=26191

Click to expand...

Hello Rahu,

Thank you for your timely comment.

I am confused. Does your inquiry (above) mean that it is perfectly OK with you if Deborah Tavares FORGES the proof she uses in support of her claims?

Regardless, I will answer your question below.

ALUMINUM:

No. Our public servants were trying to make it rain to protect us from deadly forest fires during extended periods of drought. To make it rain, they use a process known as "cloud seeding". Cloud seeding involves releasing powdered compounds (including powdered metals) at high altitudes to give water molecules high in the atmosphere something to condense to and form rain droplets, thereby making it rain. Scientists have been seeding clouds in California for more than 50 years and have determined the best compounds to use to make it rain. These compounds are listed below in a Los Angeles County, California publication.

(Begin Quote)
What materials are used in cloud seeding?

The most common material in cloud seeding is silver iodide. The manually operated generators contain a solution of silver iodide, acetone, and sodium iodide. Remote operated generators contain ammonium perchlorate, zinc powder, aluminum powder, silver iodide, copper iodide and ammonium iodide. Only acetone is listed as a hazardous material by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and it will be used, disposed, and transported in such a way that there will be no significant hazard to the public and environment. After going through combustion, acetone breaks down into CO2 and water.

(End Quote)

For the rest of this article, CLICK HERE. It is excellent.
https://dpw.lacounty.gov/wrd/Projects/Cloudseeding/CloudSeedingFAQ.pdf


THIMEROSOL (MERCURY):

As to why medical scientists selected Thimerosol, a mercury compound, as a preservative in vaccines in the 1930's was because it killed the bacteria and fungus that previously contaminated vaccines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal_and_vaccines

I do not support the use of Thimerosol in vaccines. But, it is not a part of a depopulation plan any more than cloud seeding is. It was simply a poor choice then (at the time) and am even poorer choice now.


5G:

5G causes produces dangerous amounts of radiation, particularly the closer you get to the source. Its damage to the DNA of sperm cells is particularly disturbing. It will be implemented across the globe to generate record profits for powerful corporations despite its health hazards to the general public (just like cell phones and GMO food).

I do not support 5G under any set of circumstances. But, it is not part of a depopulation plan any more than cloud seeding is.

CONCLUSION:
There is simply no correlation between cloud seeding, vaccines and 5G. They are all harmful, but none of them are created by the elite for the purpose of causing harm.

The real debate is whether these things help us more than they harm us. But, that is another debate for another time.

Again, thank you for your timely comment.

All The Best,

Snoop

rahu said:

PGE,the power utility in nrothen California has declared bankruptcy a few months ago because it is clear that a major source of the forest fires came from their equipment's. now PGE and agreeing that a second forest fire was also started by their equipment. the evidence of these fires being directly at the site of PGE's equipment is so overwhelming that they have admitted culpability without any further question. the reason is that by admitting their equipment oion the grown created some of these fires, the have effectively draw inquiry from the PGE/Rothschild orbiting micros wave accumulators that were the real cause of these fires.
the existence of these micro wave accumulators in geo centric orbit is being covered up.

rahu




The second video shows Debora Tavares’ interview with Jeff Rense in 2015 conclusively provides documented proof of premeditation of fire destruction of Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, in Northern California using microwave weaponry.

her video was long ago deleted and comments imade about her video have also beendeleted after her video was delted.. so I recap what the video was about...
she showed a series of email exchanges wit jeff rense who was a official inn a California state agency.. I don't quite remember which it was ... but tavares got him to admit that yes.. the rothschilds nd PGE in orbit huge dishes that were collecting solar radiation and converting ot to microswaves which were being sent down to PGE installations and added to the power grid .these collection stations were in san rosa and exactly at the center os the fires. yet surrounding properties were incinerated while none of the 3 companies involved in the micros collection were touched by the fire.
as said this video which showed the actual emails received from jeff rense have been deleted and all comments about this have been deleted,

so right now these mirrors are sending micros wave down to earth while you read this and no public mention has ever been made by the Rothschild controlled main stewam propagandist. the idea for orbiting mirrors was first suggest by Nazi scientist in ww2 and nazi scientist brought over illegally afterww2 are the source of this technology today.



http://beforeitsnews.com/paranormal/...o-2530821.html


California Fires: Laser Beams From The Sky – Be Warned – They Are In Full Swing!
What are the chances that 3 of the largest avionics military laser companies are located in the same exact area as the Santa Rosa, CA fires occurred, yet none got torched?
L-3 technologies, Keysight, AEG Industries and Sonoma Design Group are all in Santa Rosa and are held by some of the largest weapons manufactures in the world!

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More...

​

Additionally, over two weeks now, and no official ‘story‘ about how so many fires self ignited all at once in the middle of the dark of night.

5G, Pacific Gas and Electric? Climate Change w/ Diablo Winds? Are all being talked about but none come close to explain the hell fires that occurred and torched metal, glass, rubber, granite, etc. to the ground in minutes, yet left trees and other buildings in tact.
The second video shows Debora Tavares’ interview with Jeff Rense in 2015 conclusively provides documented proof of premeditation of fire destruction of Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, in Northern California using microwave weaponry.
Additionally, RFID trackers are being used to locate victims in the vaporized rubble that is left of former residences.
Part II will cover the logging companies efforts to provide massive fuel for West Coast forest fires using the hackn’ squirt tree destroying methods of the Fischer Brothers, of Levi Strauss Jeans and GAP Stores fame.
This is all part of Agenda 21, which we will show is in full swing directly after the fires.
https://youtu.be/RBLBAM-Vi3c

this video was published over 2years by Deborah Tavares .she confronts PGE and others.
show predicted the north cal fires fire exactly as they happen.
must see..

https://youtu.be/RGcvkAGCwFM


interestingly PGE is in cahoots with the Rothschilds. they already have in place space based solar collectors that turn the sunlight into microwaves which are then transmitted to collectors on earth. and guess where these microwave collectors are....Sevastopol California... ground zero of the wild fires.
these micro wave canbe aimed anywhere and the microwaves can cause fires and human deaths where ever thes are aimed.....again these are now operational theyare functioning and in orbit. so it is clear the southern California fires are being created by the same way the notrthern California fires were.
Thanks [URL="http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/"]http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/[/URL]

Click to expand...

Hello Rahu,
What follows is a SECOND (AND DIFFERENT) Deborah Tavares hoax relating to the recent fires in California. What follows is NOT A DUPLICATE of my post above. Read it to see the difference.

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE AGENDA 21 HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX).

For all other Deborah Tavares hoaxes (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, PG&E Fires, Genocide), click here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...eborah-Tavares

THE HOAX: In the "Agenda 21 Hoax", Deborah Tavares claims to have discovered another secret or leaked document which she fraudulently claims proves that the United Nations is using diabolical methods (like fires) to force us out or our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so.

AGENDA 21 IS A 100 PAGE DOCUMENT. Agenda 21 was written by the world's leading environmental scientists (not by "PG&E", the "Rothschilds" or the "Rockefellers"). Agenda 21 was first presented to the public at the "EARTH SUMMIT" (an environmental conference) in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil in 1992.

According to the "Agenda 21" document itself (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim), its purpose is to SLOW DOWN the rate at which the environment is destroyed. It would have PROTECTED MOST OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, REDUCED DROUGHT and INSURED AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER not contaminated by SEWAGE.

According to the Agenda 21 DOCUMENT ITSELF, the purpose of Agenda 21 IS NOT to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes into tightly-packed, over-populated cities in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. Instead, according to the Agenda 21 DOCUMENT ITSELF, the REAL purpose of Agenda 21 is to PRESERVE MOST OF THE FORESTS THAT REMAIN, exactly the opposite to what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax (to the effect that the United Nations destroyed the forests of California in furtherance of Agenda 21 WHICH WAS ACTUALLY INTENDED TO PRESERVE THOSE VERY FORESTS FROM DESTRUCTION IN THE FIRST PLACE).

Agenda 21 was only a SUGGESTION that member nations were permitted, BUT NOT REQUIRED TO ADOPT for themselves. Agenda 21 does not apply in the United States because it is not the law in the United States and therefore cannot be enforced anywhere in the United States. So, Agenda 21 is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States.

BELOW IS A SECTION OF THE ACTUAL "TABLE OF CONTENTS" OF "AGENDA 21" ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF "AGENDA 21".

SECTION II. CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES FOR DEVELOPMENT
9. Protection of the atmosphere 9.1 - 9.35
10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources 10.1 - 10.18
11. COMBATING DEFORESTATION 11.1 - 11.40
12. MANAGING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING desertification and DROUGHT 12.1 - 12.63
13. Managing fragile ecosystems: sustainable mountain development 13.1 - 13.24
14. Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development 14.1 - 14.104
15. CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY15.1 - 15.11
16. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF BIODIVERSITY 16.1 - 16.46
17. Protection of the oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources 17.1 - 17.136
18.PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES: application of integrated approaches to the development, MANAGEMENT and use OF WATER RESOURCES 18.1 - 18.90
19. Environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, including prevention of illegal international
traffic in toxic and dangerous products 19.1 - 19.76
20. Environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes, in hazardous wastes 20.1 - 20.46
21. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF solid wastes and SEWAGE-RELATED ISSUES 21.1 - 21.49
22. Safe and environmentally sound management of radioactive wastes

AND, ALL OF THIS IS ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF AGENDA 21 HERE.
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf

BELOW IS THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21.

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf
(THIS IS A MUST READ.). BEGIN AT SECTION 11.1 AT ABOUT 25% THROUGH THE TEXT. THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21 READS AS FOLLOWS:

AGENDA 21 – CHAPTER 11

COMBATING DEFORESTATION

PROGRAMME AREAS

A. Sustaining the multiple roles and functions of all types of FORESTS, FOREST LANDS and WOODLANDS.

Basis for action

11.1. There are major weaknesses in the policies, methods and mechanisms adopted to support and develop the multiple ecological, economic, social and cultural roles of TREES, FORESTS, and FOREST LANDS. Many developed countries are confronted with the effects of air pollution and FIRE DAMAGE ON THEIR FORESTS. More effective measures and approaches are often required at the national level to improve and harmonize policy formulation, planning and programming; legislative measures and instruments; development patterns; participation of the general public, especially women and indigenous people; involvement of youth; roles of the private sector, local organizations, non-governmental organizations and cooperatives; development of technical and multidisciplinary skills and quality of human resources; FORESTRY extension and public education; research capability and support; administrative structures and mechanisms, including intersectoral coordination, decentralization and responsibility and incentive systems; and dissemination of information and public relations. This is especially important to ensure a rational and holistic approach to the sustainable and environmentally sound development of FORESTS. The need for securing the multiple roles of FORESTS and FOREST LANDS through adequate and appropriate institutional strengthening has been repeatedly emphasized in many of the reports, decisions and recommendations of FAO, ITTO, UNEP, the World Bank, IUCN and other organizations.

Objectives
11.2. The objectives of this programme area are as follows:
a. To STRENGTHEN FOREST-RELATED NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, to enhance the scope and effectiveness of activities related to the management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of FORESTS, and to effectively ensure the sustainable utilization and production of FORESTS' goods and services in both the developed and the developing countries; by the year 2000, to strengthen the capacities and capabilities of national institutions to enable them to acquire the necessary knowledge for the PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION OF FORESTS, as well as to expand their scope and, correspondingly, enhance the effectiveness of programmes and activities related to the management and development of FORESTS;
b. To strengthen and improve human, technical and professional skills, as well as expertise and capabilities to effectively formulate and implement policies, plans, programmes, research and projects on management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of all types of FORESTS and FOREST-based resources, and FOREST LANDS inclusive, as well as other areas from which FORESTS BENEFITS CAN BE DERIVED.

AND, THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST TWO PARAGRAPHS OF SECTION 11 OF AGENDA 21!

IMPORTANT: You will note from the actual WRITTEN words of Agenda 21, that THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR INCREMENTALLY REDUCING THE AREAS ALREADY OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE (to systematically drive them from their rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "KILL CITIES" or "SMART CITIES" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind). According to the actual WRITTEN words of Agenda 21 itself, its actual WRITTEN purpose is to keep things FROM GETTING EVEN WORSE THAN THEY ALREADY ARE (IN TERMS OF DEFORESTATION). See Post #166 in the link at the very top of this thread for an excellent discussion of this.

THE AGENDA 21 MAP: CLICK ON THE THIS LINK. ONCE THERE, CLICK ON THE TWO (2) YELLOW, ORANGE AND RED MAPS.

https://www.google.com/search?source...30.Fm6zNgdf57I

The Agenda 21 MAP of the United States is self-explanatory. It VISUALLY indicates that the purpose of Agenda 21 is TO LIMIT FURTHER DEFORESTATION, as described in the Agenda 21 document above. Note that the Agenda 21 map was made in or before 1992. Note that at the time it was made (in or before 1992), the remaining forests on the map that were to be off-limits to FURTHER (ADDITIONAL) DEFORESTATION were the FORESTS and WILDERNESS AREAS that remained undeveloped at that time (in or before 1992). Note also that those making the Agenda 21 map often tried to "CONNECT" isolated wilderness areas with one another using narrow (very thin) "migration trails" so that animals might find mates outside their tiny wilderness "reservations" so as to ensure "BIO-DIVERSITY" (also a stated goal of Agenda 21).

IMPORTANT: You will note by looking at the Agenda 21 map, that THERE IS NO AREA OF THE MAP OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE THAT HAS BEEN REDUCED IN SIZE (OR MADE SMALLER) THAN THE AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE AT THE TIME THE MAP WAS MADE IN 1992. So, there is likewise nothing about the Agenda 21 map which suggests that people will occupy less of an area than they occupy now (or that might suggest that people will be systematically driven from their rural and suburban homes into tightly-packed, over-populated "KILL CITIES" or "SMART CITIES" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind). According to areas on the Agenda 21 map for which FURTHER (ADDITIONAL) development would be off-limits, it is perfectly obvious (when looking at the map) that the actual purpose of Agenda 21 was to keep things FROM GETTING EVEN WORSE THAN THEY ALREADY ARE (IN TERMS OF DEFORESTATION). No other conclusion is logically possible by looking at the Agenda 21 map.

LOGICAL CONCLUSION:
Unless the forgoing official documents taken from the ACTUAL PAGES of Agenda 21 are forgeries, THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES DID NOT ADVANCE THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (TO PREVENT FURTHER DEFORESTATION). INDEED, THEY ACTUALLY UNDERMINED THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (BY DESTROYING THE VERY FORESTS THAT AGENDA 21 WAS INTENDED TO PROTECT)!

AS A RESULT, THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES WERE NOT AGENDA 21 FIRES, EVEN IF THEY WERE THE RESULT OF SOME OTHER CONSPIRACY, unrelated to Agenda 21.

APPLICATION:
If I were a charlatan, and if I wanted to create a BETTER version of the Agenda 21 Hoax, this is how I would do it.

1. I would create videos and I would show the REAL, ACTUAL "AGENDA 21" DOCUMENT (unmodified) showing the Agenda 21 "agenda" AS IT IS ACTUALLY WRITTEN in the official document (showing that its purpose is to PROTECT THE REMAINING FORESTS, PREVENT DROUGHT AND ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE (all of which is verifiably true).

2. Then, in my videos, I would show written proof that "Agenda 21" was EFFECTIVELY REJECTED by the U.S. Government as a whole AND THAT IT IS NOT THE LAW, AND THEREFORE NOT ENFORCEABLE ANYWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES (all of which is verifiably true).

3. Then, in my videos, I would show ALL OF THE ENVIROMENTAL CALAMITIES SUFFERED BY CALIFORNIANS SINCE 1992, when Agenda 21 was first proposed and effectively rejected by the U.S. Government (DESTRUCTION OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, INCREASED DROUGHT, ABSENCE OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE, PEOPLE RENDERED HOMELESS AND DISPLACED BY FOREST FIRES).

4. Then, in my videos, I would claim that "THE REFUSAL" (ITSELF) of U.S. Government to adopt "Agenda 21" in I992, and every year since then, constitutes conclusive "PROOF" that the U.S. Government ACTUALLY WANTED TO PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL THE REMAINING FORESTS IN CALIFORNIA, PURPOSELY INCREASE DROUGHTS IN CALIFORNIA AND PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL SUPPLIES OF FRESH WATER IN CALIFORNIA to drive Californians out of their rural and suburban homes and into cities away from the forests and wilderness areas.

That would make a much BETTER "Agenda 21 Hoax", BECAUSE (except for the nefarious intentions of the U.S. Government part) IT IS ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, VERIFIABLY AND FACTUALLY TRUE IN EVERY SINGLE RESPECT! That would make for a much more LOGICAL explanation of the ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHIES IN CALIFORNIA than the story that Deborah Tavares peddles now (which actually CONTRADICTS Agenda 21).

FACT: When corporate interests are threatened by proposed laws that would reduce their profits, they launch a public relations campaign against those proposed laws. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose the proposed laws for reasons of their own selfish interests. Instead, they pretend that they oppose the proposed laws to protect the interests of society in general (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

EXAMPLE: CONSIDER THIS HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE AS IT RELATES TO AGENDA 21 (THIS MAY NOT HAVE EVER OCCURRED. IT IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE TO ILLUSTRATE THIS PRINCIPLE OF CORPORATE P.R WARS.). If made into law, Agenda 21 (a proposed law) would slow the rate at which logging corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests (and thereby slow the rate at which they generate profits).

So, these corporate interests launch a public relations campaign against Agenda 21. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose Agenda 21 to protect their own profits. Instead, they pretend to oppose Agenda 21 to protect the rest of society (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

So, they come up with a CAREFULLY-CRAFTED LIE intended to get the rest of society to oppose Agenda 21 as much as they do. Instead of admitting that Agenda 21 would only slow down the rate at which logging corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests, they falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY WORK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION! They falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY EXPAND THE FORESTS INTO AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY DEVELOPED AND ALREADY OCCUPIED BY HUMANS, thereby systematically driving homeowners out of their rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, tightly packed, over-populated cities (something that the REAL Agenda 21 would not actually do).

This FRAUDULENT characterization of Agenda 21 would serve to make ALL THE REST OF SOCIETY join with those who profit by destroying the forests. The rest of society would OPPOSE "AGENDA 21" in the mistaken belief THAT THEY WERE SAVING THEIR OWN HOMES IN THE PROCESS. Now, THAT is a brilliant lie. But, it gets even better.

By telling such a lie, logging corporations and real estate developers, like Deborah Tavares, could continue DESTROYING THE FORESTS and continue to cash in without any opposition from the rest of society WHILE SIMULATANEOUSLY BLAMING AGENDA 21 (WHICH NEVER BECAME LAW IN THE FIRST PLACE) FOR THE HARDSHIPS THAT THEY THEMSELVES KNOWINGLY INFLICT ON THE REST OF SOCIETY IN THE PURSUIT OF THEIR PROFITS (increased droughts and therefore increased forest fires, decreased fresh water supplies uncontaminated by sewage, etc.). Now, THAT is a TRULY brilliant lie, blaming a SUGGESTION that never became law, for the hardships suffered by Californians, when the SUGGESTION that never became law WAS ACTUALLY DESIGNED TO PREVENT THOSE VERY HARDSHIPS IN THE FIRST PLACE!

Remember, the foregoing is only an ILLUSTRATION of how corporate interests engage in disinformation campaigns in order to get society to oppose proposed laws that would reduce their profits. This is an example only. This may have never occurred. That is not the point.

The point is simply that Deborah Tavares lied to us about what the what Agenda 21 says in the same way she lied to us about every other document she has ever used in support of her claims about the planned extinction of mankind.

I do not know if Deborah Tavares lied to us about the Agenda 21 document for same reasons of the type suggested in the hypothetical illustration above. As far as I am concerned, the reason she lied to us is irrelevant. All that really matters is that she lied to us AGAIN about what a document says is support of her claims of a planned extinction of mankind.

So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this Agenda 21 document provides no support for that proposition.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.

5262

snoop4truth said:

Hello Rahu,
What follows is a SECOND (AND DIFFERENT) Deborah Tavares hoax relating to the recent fires in California. What follows is NOT A DUPLICATE of my post above. Read it to see the difference.

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE AGENDA 21 HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX).

For all other Deborah Tavares hoaxes (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, PG&E Fires, Genocide), click here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...eborah-Tavares

THE HOAX: In the "Agenda 21 Hoax", Deborah Tavares claims to have discovered another secret or leaked document which she fraudulently claims proves that the United Nations is using diabolical methods (like fires) to force us out or our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so.

AGENDA 21 IS A 100 PAGE DOCUMENT. Agenda 21 was written by the world's leading environmental scientists (not by "PG&E", the "Rothschilds" or the "Rockefellers"). Agenda 21 was first presented to the public at the "EARTH SUMMIT" (an environmental conference) in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil in 1992.

According to the "Agenda 21" document itself (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim), its purpose is to SLOW DOWN the rate at which the environment is destroyed. It would have PROTECTED MOST OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, REDUCED DROUGHT and INSURED AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER not contaminated by SEWAGE.

According to the Agenda 21 DOCUMENT ITSELF, the purpose of Agenda 21 IS NOT to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes into tightly-packed, over-populated cities in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. Instead, according to the Agenda 21 DOCUMENT ITSELF, the REAL purpose of Agenda 21 is to PRESERVE MOST OF THE FORESTS THAT REMAIN, exactly the opposite to what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax (to the effect that the United Nations destroyed the forests of California in furtherance of Agenda 21 WHICH WAS ACTUALLY INTENDED TO PRESERVE THOSE VERY FORESTS FROM DESTRUCTION IN THE FIRST PLACE).

Agenda 21 was only a SUGGESTION that member nations were permitted, BUT NOT REQUIRED TO ADOPT for themselves. Agenda 21 does not apply in the United States because it is not the law in the United States and therefore cannot be enforced anywhere in the United States. So, Agenda 21 is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States.

BELOW IS A SECTION OF THE ACTUAL "TABLE OF CONTENTS" OF "AGENDA 21" ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF "AGENDA 21".

SECTION II. CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES FOR DEVELOPMENT
9. Protection of the atmosphere 9.1 - 9.35
10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources 10.1 - 10.18
11. COMBATING DEFORESTATION 11.1 - 11.40
12. MANAGING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING desertification and DROUGHT 12.1 - 12.63
13. Managing fragile ecosystems: sustainable mountain development 13.1 - 13.24
14. Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development 14.1 - 14.104
15. CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY15.1 - 15.11
16. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF BIODIVERSITY 16.1 - 16.46
17. Protection of the oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources 17.1 - 17.136
18.PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES: application of integrated approaches to the development, MANAGEMENT and use OF WATER RESOURCES 18.1 - 18.90
19. Environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, including prevention of illegal international
traffic in toxic and dangerous products 19.1 - 19.76
20. Environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes, in hazardous wastes 20.1 - 20.46
21. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF solid wastes and SEWAGE-RELATED ISSUES 21.1 - 21.49
22. Safe and environmentally sound management of radioactive wastes

AND, ALL OF THIS IS ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF AGENDA 21 HERE.
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf

BELOW IS THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21.

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf
(THIS IS A MUST READ.). BEGIN AT SECTION 11.1 AT ABOUT 25% THROUGH THE TEXT. THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21 READS AS FOLLOWS:

AGENDA 21 – CHAPTER 11

COMBATING DEFORESTATION

PROGRAMME AREAS

A. Sustaining the multiple roles and functions of all types of FORESTS, FOREST LANDS and WOODLANDS.

Basis for action

11.1. There are major weaknesses in the policies, methods and mechanisms adopted to support and develop the multiple ecological, economic, social and cultural roles of TREES, FORESTS, and FOREST LANDS. Many developed countries are confronted with the effects of air pollution and FIRE DAMAGE ON THEIR FORESTS. More effective measures and approaches are often required at the national level to improve and harmonize policy formulation, planning and programming; legislative measures and instruments; development patterns; participation of the general public, especially women and indigenous people; involvement of youth; roles of the private sector, local organizations, non-governmental organizations and cooperatives; development of technical and multidisciplinary skills and quality of human resources; FORESTRY extension and public education; research capability and support; administrative structures and mechanisms, including intersectoral coordination, decentralization and responsibility and incentive systems; and dissemination of information and public relations. This is especially important to ensure a rational and holistic approach to the sustainable and environmentally sound development of FORESTS. The need for securing the multiple roles of FORESTS and FOREST LANDS through adequate and appropriate institutional strengthening has been repeatedly emphasized in many of the reports, decisions and recommendations of FAO, ITTO, UNEP, the World Bank, IUCN and other organizations.

Objectives
11.2. The objectives of this programme area are as follows:
a. To STRENGTHEN FOREST-RELATED NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, to enhance the scope and effectiveness of activities related to the management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of FORESTS, and to effectively ensure the sustainable utilization and production of FORESTS' goods and services in both the developed and the developing countries; by the year 2000, to strengthen the capacities and capabilities of national institutions to enable them to acquire the necessary knowledge for the PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION OF FORESTS, as well as to expand their scope and, correspondingly, enhance the effectiveness of programmes and activities related to the management and development of FORESTS;
b. To strengthen and improve human, technical and professional skills, as well as expertise and capabilities to effectively formulate and implement policies, plans, programmes, research and projects on management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of all types of FORESTS and FOREST-based resources, and FOREST LANDS inclusive, as well as other areas from which FORESTS BENEFITS CAN BE DERIVED.

AND, THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST TWO PARAGRAPHS OF SECTION 11 OF AGENDA 21!

IMPORTANT: You will note from the actual WRITTEN words of Agenda 21, that THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR INCREMENTALLY REDUCING THE AREAS ALREADY OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE (to systematically drive them from their rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "KILL CITIES" or "SMART CITIES" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind). According to the actual WRITTEN words of Agenda 21 itself, its actual WRITTEN purpose is to keep things FROM GETTING EVEN WORSE THAN THEY ALREADY ARE (IN TERMS OF DEFORESTATION). See Post #166 in the link at the very top of this thread for an excellent discussion of this.

THE AGENDA 21 MAP: CLICK ON THE THIS LINK. ONCE THERE, CLICK ON THE TWO (2) YELLOW, ORANGE AND RED MAPS.

https://www.google.com/search?source...30.Fm6zNgdf57I

The Agenda 21 MAP of the United States is self-explanatory. It VISUALLY indicates that the purpose of Agenda 21 is TO LIMIT FURTHER DEFORESTATION, as described in the Agenda 21 document above. Note that the Agenda 21 map was made in or before 1992. Note that at the time it was made (in or before 1992), the remaining forests on the map that were to be off-limits to FURTHER (ADDITIONAL) DEFORESTATION were the FORESTS and WILDERNESS AREAS that remained undeveloped at that time (in or before 1992). Note also that those making the Agenda 21 map often tried to "CONNECT" isolated wilderness areas with one another using narrow (very thin) "migration trails" so that animals might find mates outside their tiny wilderness "reservations" so as to ensure "BIO-DIVERSITY" (also a stated goal of Agenda 21).

IMPORTANT: You will note by looking at the Agenda 21 map, that THERE IS NO AREA OF THE MAP OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE THAT HAS BEEN REDUCED IN SIZE (OR MADE SMALLER) THAN THE AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE AT THE TIME THE MAP WAS MADE IN 1992. So, there is likewise nothing about the Agenda 21 map which suggests that people will occupy less of an area than they occupy now (or that might suggest that people will be systematically driven from their rural and suburban homes into tightly-packed, over-populated "KILL CITIES" or "SMART CITIES" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind). According to areas on the Agenda 21 map for which FURTHER (ADDITIONAL) development would be off-limits, it is perfectly obvious (when looking at the map) that the actual purpose of Agenda 21 was to keep things FROM GETTING EVEN WORSE THAN THEY ALREADY ARE (IN TERMS OF DEFORESTATION). No other conclusion is logically possible by looking at the Agenda 21 map.

LOGICAL CONCLUSION:
Unless the forgoing official documents taken from the ACTUAL PAGES of Agenda 21 are forgeries, THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES DID NOT ADVANCE THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (TO PREVENT FURTHER DEFORESTATION). INDEED, THEY ACTUALLY UNDERMINED THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (BY DESTROYING THE VERY FORESTS THAT AGENDA 21 WAS INTENDED TO PROTECT)!

AS A RESULT, THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES WERE NOT AGENDA 21 FIRES, EVEN IF THEY WERE THE RESULT OF SOME OTHER CONSPIRACY, unrelated to Agenda 21.

APPLICATION:
If I were a charlatan, and if I wanted to create a BETTER version of the Agenda 21 Hoax, this is how I would do it.

1. I would create videos and I would show the REAL, ACTUAL "AGENDA 21" DOCUMENT (unmodified) showing the Agenda 21 "agenda" AS IT IS ACTUALLY WRITTEN in the official document (showing that its purpose is to PROTECT THE REMAINING FORESTS, PREVENT DROUGHT AND ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE (all of which is verifiably true).

2. Then, in my videos, I would show written proof that "Agenda 21" was EFFECTIVELY REJECTED by the U.S. Government as a whole AND THAT IT IS NOT THE LAW, AND THEREFORE NOT ENFORCEABLE ANYWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES (all of which is verifiably true).

3. Then, in my videos, I would show ALL OF THE ENVIROMENTAL CALAMITIES SUFFERED BY CALIFORNIANS SINCE 1992, when Agenda 21 was first proposed and effectively rejected by the U.S. Government (DESTRUCTION OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, INCREASED DROUGHT, ABSENCE OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE, PEOPLE RENDERED HOMELESS AND DISPLACED BY FOREST FIRES).

4. Then, in my videos, I would claim that "THE REFUSAL" (ITSELF) of U.S. Government to adopt "Agenda 21" in I992, and every year since then, constitutes conclusive "PROOF" that the U.S. Government ACTUALLY WANTED TO PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL THE REMAINING FORESTS IN CALIFORNIA, PURPOSELY INCREASE DROUGHTS IN CALIFORNIA AND PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL SUPPLIES OF FRESH WATER IN CALIFORNIA to drive Californians out of their rural and suburban homes and into cities away from the forests and wilderness areas.

That would make a much BETTER "Agenda 21 Hoax", BECAUSE (except for the nefarious intentions of the U.S. Government part) IT IS ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, VERIFIABLY AND FACTUALLY TRUE IN EVERY SINGLE RESPECT! That would make for a much more LOGICAL explanation of the ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHIES IN CALIFORNIA than the story that Deborah Tavares peddles now (which actually CONTRADICTS Agenda 21).

FACT: When corporate interests are threatened by proposed laws that would reduce their profits, they launch a public relations campaign against those proposed laws. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose the proposed laws for reasons of their own selfish interests. Instead, they pretend that they oppose the proposed laws to protect the interests of society in general (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

EXAMPLE: CONSIDER THIS HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE AS IT RELATES TO AGENDA 21 (THIS MAY NOT HAVE EVER OCCURRED. IT IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE TO ILLUSTRATE THIS PRINCIPLE OF CORPORATE P.R WARS.). If made into law, Agenda 21 (a proposed law) would slow the rate at which logging corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests (and thereby slow the rate at which they generate profits).

So, these corporate interests launch a public relations campaign against Agenda 21. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose Agenda 21 to protect their own profits. Instead, they pretend to oppose Agenda 21 to protect the rest of society (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

So, they come up with a CAREFULLY-CRAFTED LIE intended to get the rest of society to oppose Agenda 21 as much as they do. Instead of admitting that Agenda 21 would only slow down the rate at which logging corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests, they falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY WORK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION! They falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY EXPAND THE FORESTS INTO AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY DEVELOPED AND ALREADY OCCUPIED BY HUMANS, thereby systematically driving homeowners out of their rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, tightly packed, over-populated cities (something that the REAL Agenda 21 would not actually do).

This FRAUDULENT characterization of Agenda 21 would serve to make ALL THE REST OF SOCIETY join with those who profit by destroying the forests. The rest of society would OPPOSE "AGENDA 21" in the mistaken belief THAT THEY WERE SAVING THEIR OWN HOMES IN THE PROCESS. Now, THAT is a brilliant lie. But, it gets even better.

By telling such a lie, logging corporations and real estate developers, like Deborah Tavares, could continue DESTROYING THE FORESTS and continue to cash in without any opposition from the rest of society WHILE SIMULATANEOUSLY BLAMING AGENDA 21 (WHICH NEVER BECAME LAW IN THE FIRST PLACE) FOR THE HARDSHIPS THAT THEY THEMSELVES KNOWINGLY INFLICT ON THE REST OF SOCIETY IN THE PURSUIT OF THEIR PROFITS (increased droughts and therefore increased forest fires, decreased fresh water supplies uncontaminated by sewage, etc.). Now, THAT is a TRULY brilliant lie, blaming a SUGGESTION that never became law, for the hardships suffered by Californians, when the SUGGESTION that never became law WAS ACTUALLY DESIGNED TO PREVENT THOSE VERY HARDSHIPS IN THE FIRST PLACE!

Remember, the foregoing is only an ILLUSTRATION of how corporate interests engage in disinformation campaigns in order to get society to oppose proposed laws that would reduce their profits. This is an example only. This may have never occurred. That is not the point.

The point is simply that Deborah Tavares lied to us about what the what Agenda 21 says in the same way she lied to us about every other document she has ever used in support of her claims about the planned extinction of mankind.

I do not know if Deborah Tavares lied to us about the Agenda 21 document for same reasons of the type suggested in the hypothetical illustration above. As far as I am concerned, the reason she lied to us is irrelevant. All that really matters is that she lied to us AGAIN about what a document says is support of her claims of a planned extinction of mankind.

So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this Agenda 21 document provides no support for that proposition.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.

Click to expand...

every criticism you give is problematically because you ignore the entire picture by restricting you call of hoaxes on Tavares.

you seem to be like every other new world order apologist.....you do not respond to the known facts and supply a list of alternate facts that are dubious at the best.

as to your focus on agenda 21, again myopic, as bill gates and many other world figures have called for a population reduction of 90% of the world's population. this is only possible by killing and sterilizing billions of people.bill gates was kicked out of india. the government wanted to try him for murder because his vaccines killed over 40 000 tribal people. but they realized they could never convict so thy just threw him and his vaccination programs out of the country.

I'm not going on,you obviously have a grudge or a agenda because you don't acknowledge the evidence existent.
continue posting but I am putting you on my ignore list as I'm not wasting anymore time on your obfuscation of the obvious satanic intentions of the Rothschild/likudniks.

rahu said:

5262


every criticism you give is problematically because you ignore the entire picture by restricting you call of hoaxes on Tavares.

you seem to be like every other new world order apologist.....you do not respond to the known facts and supply a list of alternate facts that are dubious at the best.

as to your focus on agenda 21, again myopic, as bill gates and many other world figures have called for a population reduction of 90% of the world's population. this is only possible by killing and sterilizing billions of people.bill gates was kicked out of india. the government wanted to try him for murder because his vaccines killed over 40 000 tribal people. but they realized they could never convict so thy just threw him and his vaccination programs out of the country.

I'm not going on,you obviously have a grudge or a agenda because you don't acknowledge the evidence existent.
continue posting but I am putting you on my ignore list as I'm not wasting anymore time on your obfuscation of the obvious satanic intentions of the Rothschild/likudniks.

Click to expand...

Rabu, is there one Rothschild running the agenda, and if so, any chance of seeing his Natal-chart?

david starling said:

Rabu, is there one Rothschild running the agenda, and if so, any chance of seeing his Natal-chart?

Click to expand...

I don't now the in's and out's of the Rothschild lineage. there isn't a asteroid fro Rothschild's like there is for the Hapsburgs .
but I would think going back your Mayer Amschel Rothschild might be the chart to look at.

the world domination plan is centuries old and I am not sure if any single living Rothschild's chart could reflect the enormity of the suppression envisioned.
rahu

Light skimming proves these are clearly shills, though it's hard to tell if they are cognitive and outright lying, or just so damaged they actually cite huffpo as a credible source! (I didn't bother beyond that, why would anyone!?)

It doesn't take much work to find the many accounts of retired military warning 5G should be near no living thing.

Of course youtube & even liveleak pull these videos as they want to keep the genpop stupid. Sad to see how well it's working.

Here's some empiric evidence, turn the volume up on the 1st vid in this link.
https://www.aircrap.org/2019/01/20/california-fires-citizen-investigator-latest-video/

I won't waste the energy either Rahu, but I will remember their names.

jac said:

Light skimming proves these are clearly shills, though it's hard to tell if they are cognitive and outright lying, or just so damaged they actually cite huffpo as a credible source! (I didn't bother beyond that, why would anyone!?)

It doesn't take much work to find the many accounts of retired military warning 5G should be near no living thing.

Of course youtube & even liveleak pull these videos as they want to keep the genpop stupid. Sad to see how well it's working.

Here's some empiric evidence, turn the volume up on the 1st vid in this link.
https://www.aircrap.org/2019/01/20/california-fires-citizen-investigator-latest-video/

I won't waste the energy either Rahu, but I will remember their names.

Click to expand...

interesting videos. nice to see they are deleted. the videos I posted here have been deleted

david starling said:

Rabu, is there one Rothschild running the agenda, and if so, any chance of seeing his Natal-chart?

Click to expand...

I feel like any Rothschild wouldn't allow their true natal chart to be posted. Otherwise people would be able to discover more truth than they want to be known as of right now.

rahu said:

5262


every criticism you give is problematically because you ignore the entire picture by restricting you call of hoaxes on Tavares.

you seem to be like every other new world order apologist.....you do not respond to the known facts and supply a list of alternate facts that are dubious at the best.

as to your focus on agenda 21, again myopic, as bill gates and many other world figures have called for a population reduction of 90% of the world's population. this is only possible by killing and sterilizing billions of people.bill gates was kicked out of india. the government wanted to try him for murder because his vaccines killed over 40 000 tribal people. but they realized they could never convict so thy just threw him and his vaccination programs out of the country.

I'm not going on,you obviously have a grudge or a agenda because you don't acknowledge the evidence existent.
continue posting but I am putting you on my ignore list as I'm not wasting anymore time on your obfuscation of the obvious satanic intentions of the Rothschild/likudniks.

Click to expand...

Hello Rahu,

Thank you so much for your timely comments.

My responses are below.

YOUR COMMENT: every criticism you give is problematically because you ignore the entire picture by restricting you call of hoaxes on Tavares.

MY RESPONSE: Correct. Agreed. My sole focus is the hoax itself, not the underlying claims that might be supported by the hoax. So, my sole focus is on whether the documents that Deborah Tavares uses in support of her claims actually supports her claims. Nothing more.

Over the last 5 years, I have exposed the hoaxes of three professional charlatans, Rodney DALE Class (“Judge DALE”), Eddie Craig and Deborah Tavares. The hoaxes of Rodney DALE Class and Eddie Craig are not relevant to the topic of this forum. So, their hoaxes do not appear here. But, because you have posted so many comments reflecting the claims of Deborah Tavares here, she is the only charlatan that I am exposing here in this forum.

I do not investigate reputable whistleblowers, because they do not engage in hoaxes and they do not represent a threat to the American people. Only charlatans do. So, I investigate them.

Contrary to your understanding, I do not refute conspiracy theory. I am a conspiracy theorist myself. I am convinced that there are many conspiracies that are real (9/11, etc.). But, my belief in conspiracies will not prevent me from seeing a hoax and a charlatan when I see one. I still use my critical thinking skills, even when the charlatan wraps herself in the flag of conspiracy theory.
That does not fool me at all.

YOUR COMMENT: you seem to be like every other new world order apologist.....

MY RESPONSE: Respectfully, you are mistaken. I do not support, protect, defend OR APOLOGIZE for the New World Order. Likewise, I do not support, protect, defend OR APOLOGIZE for the hoaxes and fraud of Deborah Tavares. Neither should you. A person who lies to the American people harms the American people. That makes them the enemy of the American people. And, I will treat them accordingly. And, so should you.

YOUR COMMENT: you do not respond to the known facts.

MY RESPONSE: Not so. I do not ignore known facts, because they are true. I just happened to focus on exposing the lies, because they are not true.

Here is how I actually “respond”.

Example: Deborah Tavares claims that “Document X” PROVES that “Enemy X” is killing us all in furtherance of the “planned extinction of mankind”. So, I obtain a copy of “Document X”. Then, I determine who the real author of “Document X” actually is. Then, I read “Document X”. And, I determine “Document X” does not PROVE that “Enemy X” is killing us all in furtherance of the “planned extinction of mankind”. Not only does “Document X” not prove that “Enemy X” is killing us all in furtherance of the “planned extinction of mankind”, I determine that “Document X” actually PROVES that “Enemy X” IS SAVING US ALL from the “planned extinction of mankind”. (This actually occurred with the NASA War Document).

Nothing about what I do “ignores known facts”. I simply verify the accuracy of Deborah Tavares claims.

Contrary to you understanding, there is nothing wrong with me doing that.

I am telling the truth in every case. And, you should be supporting me and my efforts instead of the reverse. No person in the truth movement, including you, should ever take the side of a known fraud against a truther for telling the truth. The truth movement is founded ON THE TRUTH. If we ever lose sight of that reality, we are no better than the people on the other side. So, do not catch yourself becoming a Deborah Tavares apologist and supporting her intentional fraud of the American people and attacking those truthers who tell the truth about her.

YOUR COMMENT: and supply a list of alternate facts that are dubious at the best.

MY RESPONSE: The truth is not “alternate facts”. The truth is simply the facts. It is the “facts” that the charlatan creates in support of the hoax that are the REAL “ALTERATE FACTS”. It is those "alternate facts" that I expose as the fraud that they are.

And, in my defense, there is nothing “dubious” about my facts. My facts are supported by documents that I played no part in writing. I actually provide links to those documents in my comments. It is the claims of Deborah Tavares whose “facts” are not supported by the documents that she uses in support of those "facts". Many of her supporting documents are documents that she FORGED herself (like the FORGED PG&E emails, The Judge DALE Books, The Court Registry Investment System Document, etc.).

MY RESPONSE: as to your focus on agenda 21, again myopic,

MY RESPONSE: Correct. Agreed. As it should be. My sole focus is whether the Agenda 21 document that Deborah Tavares uses in support of her claims actually supports her claims. I correctly concluded that the Agenda 21 document that Deborah Tavares uses in support of her claims ACTUALLY REFUTES HER CLAIMS ABOUT AGENDA 21. That is my sole focus. That is why my work is myopic. I do not get off point. I stay on point. My focus is not on the underlying conspiracy. My focus is not on all of conspiracy theory. My focus is not on claims made by reputable whistleblowers. Instead, my focus is on the document itself and whether it supports the claims of Deborah Tavares. Nothing more. That is why work is so focused (what you call "myopic").

I am not refuting a single conspiracy theory. I am not refuting all of conspiracy theory. I am a conspiracy theorist myself. There are conspiracies that are real (9/11, etc.). But, my belief in conspiracies will not prevent me from knowing a hoax and a charlatan when I see one. I do not turn off my critical thinking skills just because the hoax and the charlatan wrap themselves up in the flag of conspiracy theory. My eyes are STILL WIDE OPEN.

YOUR COMMENT: as bill gates and many other world figures have called for a population reduction of 90% of the world's population.

MY RESPONSE: Yes. This is true. But, that will not “justify” you becoming a Deborah Tavares apologist and supporting and defending her intentional fraud of the American people. Think. Both Bill Gates and Deborah Tavares represent a threat to mankind. Bill Gates represents the threat of sterilization. Deborah Tavares represents the threat to mankind in inciting hatred and violence against people with no connection to Bill Gates or to his agenda. Thus, Deborah Tavares will TURN US AGAINST OURSELVES. She is going to get innocent Americans killed. And, it will all be the result of a Deborah Tavares hoax. A LIE! That is my concern. That should be your concern too.

You should be supporting my efforts in telling the truth instead of the reverse.

Look the math here is simple.

The truth helps us. Lies hurt us. Do not catch yourself taking the side of lies that hurt us and against the truth that helps us. That would make you complicit in the harm done by the lies. Use your critical thinking skills. Wake up!

The truther is the “good guy”. The liar is the “bad guy”. Do not catch yourself taking the side of the bad guy against the good guy who is telling the truth. That would make you complicit in the harm done by the lies. Use your critical thinking skills. Wake up!

The truther is one of us. The liar is on the other side. Do not catch yourself joining the liar on the other side against one of us who is telling the truth. That would make you complicit in the harm done by the lies. Use your critical thinking skills. Wake up!

YOUR COMMENT: this is only possible by killing and sterilizing billions of people.

MY RESPONSE: Yes. But, that will STILL not “justify” you becoming a Deborah Tavares apologist and supporting her intentional fraud of the American people. Her intentional fraud does not harm Bill Gates. Her intentional fraud harms the very same people that Bill Gates harms. ALL OF US. Think about it. Your becoming an apologist for a fraud means that you have become complicit in harming the American people yourself. Wake up! And stop doing it!

YOUR COMMENT: bill gates was kicked out of india. the government wanted to try him for murder because his vaccines killed over 40 000 tribal people. but they realized they could never convict so thy just threw him and his vaccination programs out of the country.

MY RESPONSE: That is unbelievable. But, that STILL does not justify you becoming an apologist for the fraud of Deborah Tavares and becoming complicit in causing harm to the American people.

YOUR COMMENT: I'm not going on, you obviously have a grudge or an agenda.

MY RESPONSE: I do have an agenda. It is to tell the truth, even when it is not popular to do so, as it is here on this thread. I only wish that you were brave enough to do the same. Perhaps in time, you will warm up to he truth and courageously stand up for the truth, even when it is not popular to do so, as it is here on this thread.

But, to be perfectly honest, it is also true that I have a grudge. One of Deborah Tavares’ hoaxes (The” Judge DALE Hoax”) targeted me, as a lawyer. In this hoax, Deborah Tavares co-wrote and published a series of FAKE legal books which revealed FAKE legal information in which she fraudulently claimed that I (and all other lawyers) was/were part of the New World Order Cabal and were illegal, invalid, imposters, traitors, foreign agents, uneducated, unqualified, unlicensed and the enemy of all mankind. One of her partners in creating hoaxes actually called for the death of all lawyers, including me. As a conspiracy theorist and activist myself, this hoax infuriated me and I began investigating who was behind these hoaxes. The rest is history. Some of the results of my investigation appear above in this thread. Suffice it to say, Deborah Tavares is serial hoaxer and charlatan.

YOUR COMMENT: because you don't acknowledge the evidence existent.

MY RESPONSE: Not so. I acknowledge all existing evidence. But, I play special attention to FAKE EVIDENCE, manufactured, designed and intended to defraud the American people. So should you.

YOUR COMMENT: continue posting but I am putting you on my ignore list as I'm not wasting any more time on you.

MY RESPONSE: That is your right. But, turning a blind eye to the fraud of Deborah Tavares will not help you or anyone else. That will only limit your ability to think critically and will limit your ability to discern truth from fiction. And, given the number of comments you have posted reflecting the claims of Deborah Tavares on this very site, it is obvious that she has taken you hook, line and sinker. It would be much wiser for you to keep your eyes open and keep your critical thinking skills working at all times. Do not turn your critical thinking skills off just because Deborah Tavares wraps herself in the flag of conspiracy theory. She is still a charlatan, flag or no flag.

YOUR COMMENTS: Your obfuscation of the obvious satanic intentions of the Rothschild/likudniks.

MY RESPONSE: Not so. I do not obfuscate the obvious Satanic intentions of the Rothschilds. I expose the hoaxes of Deborah Tavares. There is no correlation between the two.

You act as if my exposing the hoaxes of Deborah Tavares somehow obfuscates the intentions of the Rothschilds. It does not. My exposing the hoaxes of Deborah Tavares simply adds another person (“Deborah Tavares”) to the list of the enemies of all mankind. Nothing about that obfuscates the intentions of the Rothschilds.

Thank you again for your comments and keep up the good work on 9/11.

You 9/11 stuff is truly excellent stuff.

All The Best,

Snoop

Hey Snoop, a few years back, when I was still watching network t.v., I was startled to see Bill Maher's animosity toward the 911 Truth movement. Would you say it would have meant the end of his career if he had supported it?

david starling said:

Hey Snoop, a few years back, when I was still watching network t.v., I was startled to see Bill Maher's animosity toward the 911 Truth movement. Would you say it would have meant the end of his career if he had supported it?

Click to expand...

Hello David,

Thank you for your for your timely comment.

YOUR COMMENT: Hey Snoop, a few years back, when I was still watching network t.v., I was startled to see Bill Maher's animosity toward the 911 Truth movement.

MY RESPONSE: I saw the same episode. It infuriated me. Before that outburst, I thought that Bill Maher was a straight shooter. No more.

MY RESPONSE: Would you say it would have meant the end of his career if he had supported it?

MY RESPONSE: That is one of two possible explanations that I can think of off the top of my head.

One possibility is that he was under orders to avoid legitimizing the truth about 9/11 and Building 7 collapsing into its own footprint despite that it was never hit by a plane.

The other possibility was that he got angry because several "hecklers" in his audience "interrupted his show" by screaming the truth about Building 7 while he and his guest were in the middle of discussing something else.

Either way, his reaction to these "hecklers" for being "interrupted" was completely irrational and insane.

Thank you again for your timely comment.

All The Best,

Snoop

5338
[nice to see there are some videos still available. the obvious question is if thee are hoaxes why is ll validations deleted.

I'm repostinga post that has had a most interesting video deleted.
it is by a fire captain who mentions that the material the fire fighting planes were dumping on the fires was silverfish.. not like the common retardant which is red so that the pilots can see exactly where they have covered. he mentioned this to his superiors but nothing...
so he took a sample of this slivery substance and had it analyzed jellied kerosene and another combustible substance... but the video has been deleted so I can't recheck. in the video there was video taken above a helicopter ,some hundreds feet below , and as the helicopter past over a area and discharged it's load, fire would sprout up where there was none. this continued in a straight line that helicopter flew over. so the evidence was positive that the forest fires were being started by the government agencies charged with putting them out. it is this censorship which makes it clear these fires were intentionally set and strengthened. in one report,not this video, the observation was made that In a southern California fire, the fire storm followed a track that went over the area where people were resisting the high speed train's planned route. so clearly ,they were burning these people out so as to be able to come in the build the train tracks .California is now a Rothschild fiefdom.the Rothschild have sold their remaining properties in Europe and are now going to /have establish their base of operations in California rahu
..................................................................................................


this fire was in ventura calif. this is not a area of heavy forest. this is a area of rows of homes.

the intial lies say that violent winds arouse. but the truth is "violent" winds called Santa annas do exist but they arise from the high Mojave deserts more than a hundred miles inland. why did these violent winds not cause fires near the desert.

again the cause remains unknown.

again look at the video in the above post by of a fire captain explain these fires are like anything he has ever seen.
this video is of the words of the fire fighters themselves. starting out with fire captain john lord of lake county ca

if you think this thread is a joke, you need to look at this video

Origins of CA Fires: Fire Captain Exclusive Interview Video

https://youtu.be/dnVcHOcYDhw



http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=86469

the phot below is similar a photo in the lst geo-engineered wild fire. in that photo which has now been erased from the internet, a rows of houses were completely incinerated, imcluding the granite counter tops, yet rows of trees across the street were left impossibly unscathed by the thousands of degree temperatures necessary to vaporize granite.


KEY POINT: How did so many vehicles sustain melted metal when the trees and grass and asphalt were left completely unscathed by the flames? A burning fire in
a car will last only so long before it burns out, and it certainly will not get hot enough to melt the metal components.
Melted metal flows from a burned out car abandoned on a highway during the Valley fire in Middletown, California on September 13, 2015. (Photo credit should read Josh Edelson/AFP/Getty Images

Like last year (2020), wildfires in CA and the west, and another very active hurricane season, global climate change has turned into climate catastrophe. Hurricane Ida landed in southern Louisiana last night, the state already had Zeta last Nov. I expect more record heat waves, cold snaps, droughts from below average rainfall seasons and floods from an increase in rain activity across the nation and around the world including the El Nino-La Nina cycle when a La Nina is coming soon and they are just as bad like El Ninos are.

CapAquaPis said:

Like last year (2020), wildfires in CA and the west, and another very active hurricane season, global climate change has turned into climate catastrophe. Hurricane Ida landed in southern Louisiana last night, the state already had Zeta last Nov. I expect more record heat waves, cold snaps, droughts from below average rainfall seasons and floods from an increase in rain activity across the nation and around the world including the El Nino-La Nina cycle when a La Nina is coming soon and they are just as bad like El Ninos are.

Click to expand...

Thanks! A classic example of rahu's threads, for those who joined after he was gone from this Community.