Astrologers' Community  

Go Back   Astrologers' Community > General Astrology > Other Astrology > Research and Development

Research and Development This is a forum designed for applying scientific methods and understanding to all approaches of astrology, cooperative formulation and testing of new ideas, re-examination of known methods of delineation and interpretation, and the exploration of new astrological methods of all kinds (e.g. heliocentric models, planetary nodes and apogees, etc.).


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Unread 02-01-2018, 11:30 PM
JUPITERASC's Avatar
JUPITERASC JUPITERASC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 50,520
Re: Does Materialistic Modern Science Have Limitations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post

One thing that's never mentioned, stands out for me
--It's the simple fact that the Moon and Sun move through the Zodiac in ONE direction only
and rule only ONE Sign each.
Apparently
Aeons past
SUN ruled two ZOIDONS aka DOMICILES
MOON had no domicile


Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post

Whereas, the planets display both "Direct", as defined by the movement of the Moon and Sun, and "Retrograde-motion", defined as moving in the opposite direction, and therefore move in TWO directions and Traditionally rule TWO Signs each. Ptolemy's explanation was that the Sun is too masculine to rule a "feminine" Sign, and the Moon is too feminine to rule a "masculine" Sign. Unfortunately for that explanation, the earliest known (recorded) Moon deity was decidedly male, and remained so during the entirety of the Sumerian line of civilizations, including Ancient Babylonia.
Also, no reason why a masculine entity can't rule a feminine Sign.

__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82p-D...eature=related Hippocrates Let food be your medicine: let medicine be your food. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvz9uSK3zXo Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead Tom Stoppard http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KchhSIVwMdY Every exit is an entrance to somewhere else. VETTIUS VALENS FREE http://www.csus.edu/indiv/r/rileymt/...s%20entire.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Unread 02-02-2018, 06:34 AM
david starling david starling is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 19,274
Smile Re: Does Materialistic Modern Science Have Limitations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rahu View Post
I think your definition of science is too broad. science is not just knowledge, but "science" specifically evaluates only things that can be measured. and metaphysics and astrology are thereby excluded and fall under the term of pseudo science but not necessarily in a pejorative sense .

rahu
Modern Materialistic Science co-opted the definition of "science", and now claims to be the sole arbiter of what is "real" and what is "pseudo" science. It's a Materialistic development of monotheism, with priest-like "scientists" performing their sacred ritual they call the "scientific method", revealing the laws of the One materialistic Universe and performing "scientific miracles". It's a very narrow minded version of Creation.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Unread 02-02-2018, 06:36 AM
AppLeo's Avatar
AppLeo AppLeo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11,565
Re: Does Materialistic Modern Science Have Limitations?

Modern Science just observes what we can with our senses.

You can't just start with something like God or the spaghetti monster and try and prove it. You have to start with something we can see, touch, smell, hear, and taste and then build our knowledge from there. It is limiting, but it keeps us from believing in things that aren't real.

It's like Saturn vs. Jupiter.

Saturn is limiting, but Jupiter over-expands leaving many holes unfulfilled.
__________________
Reality will be the final judge of our virtues and vices
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Unread 02-02-2018, 07:01 AM
david starling david starling is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 19,274
Smile Re: Does Materialistic Modern Science Have Limitations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JUPITERASC View Post
Apparently
Aeons past
SUN ruled two ZOIDONS aka DOMICILES
MOON had no domicile
The Moon was homeless?
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Unread 02-02-2018, 07:05 AM
david starling david starling is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 19,274
Smile Re: Does Materialistic Modern Science Have Limitations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AppLeo View Post
Modern Science just observes what we can with our senses.

You can't just start with something like God or the spaghetti monster and try and prove it. You have to start with something we can see, touch, smell, hear, and taste and then build our knowledge from there. It is limiting, but it keeps us from believing in things that aren't real.

It's like Saturn vs. Jupiter.

Saturn is limiting, but Jupiter over-expands leaving many holes unfulfilled.
Jupiter opens doors, and Saturn closes them. Mercury's a lock-pick.
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Unread 02-02-2018, 07:06 AM
AppLeo's Avatar
AppLeo AppLeo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11,565
Re: Does Materialistic Modern Science Have Limitations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post
Jupiter opens doors, and Saturn closes them. Mercury's a lock-pick.
Sure I guess.
__________________
Reality will be the final judge of our virtues and vices
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Unread 02-03-2018, 12:34 AM
rahu rahu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,865
Re: Does Materialistic Modern Science Have Limitations?

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling
Modern Materialistic Science co-opted the definition of "science", and now claims to be the sole arbiter of what is "real" and what is "pseudo" science. It's a Materialistic development of monotheism, with priest-like "scientists" performing their sacred ritual they call the "scientific method", revealing the laws of the One materialistic Universe and performing "scientific miracles". It's a very narrow minded version of Creation.


very accurate. at the base of Darwinism, for instance, is the continuing liturgy against theism of any sort. that is ,Darwinist evolution is claimed to be the only theory(though they like to call it a fact) that counters the creation of the world through supernatural means. this perspective has been verbalize by many Darwinist including Darwin himself through modern day darwinist.

Darwinism is in fact a myth as much as creationism. it has no scientific basis because all the evidence of its falsity is ignored or explained away by tautological nonsense .

rahu
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
limitations, materialistic, modern, science

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2018, AstrologyWeekly.com. Boards' structure and all posts are property of AstrologyWeekly.com and their respective creators. No part of the messages sent on these boards may be copied without their owners' explicit consent.