astrological ages aid

JUPITERASC

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
vox said:
I've found myself involved in repeated discussions concerning the credibility of astrlogical eras. I've tried to elicit examples based on limited knowledge:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrological_age#Past_ages

http://www.signsofthetimeshistory.com/ages.html

...to no avail :sad:

I'm sure a deeper insight exists; but where to find it?
How to convince a skeptic of the relevancy of astrological ages?
Click to expand...

TROPICAL ASTROLOGY 'AGES'
ARE SAID TO OCCUR AT DIFFERENT TIMES
FROM SIDEREAL ASTROLOGY 'AGES'
DUE TO THE WAY EARTH'S MOTION AROUND THE SUN IS CALCULATED https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82p-DYgGFjI&feature=related :smile:
 
V

vox

Well-known member
What is the best evidence for the credence of Astrological eras of which the dates correspond to the most common interpretations?
 
JUPITERASC

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
vox said:

What is the best evidence for the credence of Astrological eras of which the dates correspond to the most common interpretations?
Click to expand...
Opinion differs :smile:

Oddity said:
Depends who you talk to, I think.

Thing is, Aquarius rules the 8th house of the Thema Mundi. Death. And both Aquarius and death are ruled by Saturn.


I'd take the world wars as at least the pre-show to the Age of Aquarius if we want to look at it that way.
The Age of Pisces, ruled by Jupiter, is probably the best humanity is going to get for a long time,
and if it's not gone, it's almost gone.

Then we have two ages of rule-by-Saturn.
I don't mean to sound morbid, but I'm glad I won't be alive to see it.

I know Pisces has had it's problems, too,

but I can't look forward to the sign of the hatred of man (Valens, ibn Ezra)
being humanity's 'ruler' for the next 2600 years or so.
Click to expand...
 
Top