Mostly negatives in terms of combative strength of the two significators, aspects, Fortuna etc, I would have said, for the following reasons -
- 1 ruler Jupiter is at 6 Taurus in the 5th - seemingly ‘lucky’ and strong, scoring plus 14 but peregrine, not essentially dignified.
- 7 ruler Mercury, legal opponent, is marginally stronger, plus 14, on the cusp of the 9th House - having essential dignity.
- Moon is in the Via Combusta - a negative place for the querent and not a helpful action signifier.
- Need 8 ruler Moon (opponent’s $) to come to ASC, or to Jupiter (1 ruler) or to Saturn or 2nd House cusp - but none of these aspects occur here.
- 7 ruler Mercury separates from 1 ruler Jupiter by square = difficult or impossible even to negotiate some sort of outcome. Mercury is partile sextile Saturn (querent’s $, 2 ruler) but has just separated.
- Mercury is trine the Asc but again it’s a separating aspect so opponents are not coming to querent to settle.
- Mutual reception between Jupiter and Mercury only by Face so it’s something, but not a lot, in terms of helpfulness.
- A strong Mars is in the 7th, with the opponent. Mars rules 4th or outcome of the matter. Mars also disposits the querent's Fortuna and it would be most helpful if it were in querent's 1st or 2nd House - but it's not.
- 10 ruler judgment is Mercury but because this is allocated to 7 ruler opponent, take Venus, co-ruler of 10th. Venus does apply to 2 ruler Saturn but it's a square aspect - this looks like the only hope against all the other negatives that a judgment might be in querent's favour - but with only this one testimony I would not expect a real $ 'in front' outcome for the querent - even though it would seem their opponents ought to compensate them. Probably legal fees/court costs will not put the driver ‘in front.’___