Yes, from my (alternative) horary perspective your delineation was fine! Looking at the chart from the Ankara horary methodology I obtain a "no" answer as well:
(Following is not in accordance with standard horary practice and uses whole sign house format)
-querent = 1st house = Capricorn = Saturn
-quesited = 5th house = Taurus = Venus
-Venus flows away from Saturn = - testimony
-Part of Conception in Scorpio, a fertile sign = + testimony
-Part of Conception is in Scorpio = Mars significator: Mars flows toward Saturn (+) but Venus (quesited significator) flows away from Mars (-) = net neutral testimony
-Part of Conception falls @ 10 Scorpio: querent Saturn at 17 Scorpio, flows away from the Part of Conception = - testimony
-5th house under Taurus is fertile, however 5th house Taurus posits the SN: one + and one - testimony = net neutral testimony
-querent co-significator = Moon: Moon flows toward quesited Venus (+) but flows away from Saturn (-) and from Part of Conception and its significator Mars (-), and the Moon is in detriment in Capricorn (-) = net - testimony
-quesited significator Venus is in a pitted (blocked) degree of Capricorn = - testimony
Results:
Net - 3 testimonies, indicating a "no" answer to the question
Yes, I think your delineation was correctly thought out!
