Excuse me.
It's been quite some time since I have even looked at a chart for Biden that I forgot to add that the time I gave in the rectified chart that I posted above is an arbitrary thing, as to keeping that Part of Fortune in the 5th degree of Taurus puts the parameters of the time He could have been born from 8:17:24 A.M. to 8:22:14 A.M.
The chart above is based on Him possibly having been born at 8:17:35 A.M.
I have given great consideration as to the likelyhood that it was after 8:19:18 A.M, as for the reason that from 8:19:19 A.M. and on anywhere up to the limit I prescribed at 8:22:14 A.M. provides an I.C. in the 18th degree of Pisces which also happens to be both the USA natal chart's Part of Intelligence & Skill [How one best applies their intelligence skillfully, Asc. + Mars - Mercury] at 17° Pisces 55' 11", and also its Part of Catastrophe [Asc. + Uranus - Sun] at 17° Pisces 44' 11".
I seem to think I remember Trump having one of his Astrological Parts there as well? I've got all of Trumps Parts/Lots derived from his natal chart [the majority of them. See my listing of Astrological Parts derived from the USA's natal chart in the Astrological Parts sub forum, which is a "sticky", btw, and know that I calculated the exact same list of Parts for Trump. It's in one of the numerous spiral notebooks I have, there are a lot of them, scattered about my room, or in a bookcase, or under it, or piled here on this desk, or my other desk...in other words, I'm not up to searching for it especially at this hour [3:40 A.M. Sunday ...and I had planned on being in bed before 11 P.M., oh well
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ] I swore I wasn't going to get into any more "political" threads a few months ago, but I couldn't pass up demonstrating this means of rectification and in addition felt compelled to make a case as to why Biden's natal chart should be rectified.
Trump's chart is correct, of that I have no doubt, although it was likely not on the exact minute...only one person in sixty probably was born precisely "on the minute", it's simple to calculate the odds. As I wrote earlier, birth times are usually rounded up to the next nearest minute as I have found over the last 37 years of casting and analyzing natal charts, as to all births that occurred in hospitals, or where a doctor, or nurse, was in attendance and also recorded the time of birth.
The Sabian Symbol for the 18th degree of Pisces is [ibid.]
"
PISCES 18°: IN A GIGANTIC TENT, VILLAGERS WITNESS A SPECTACULAR PERFORMANCE.
KEYNOTE: The collective appeal of a well-staged and exciting display of skill and/or oratory.
At first, Marc Jones interpreted the "gigantic tent" as the locale for a revivalist's meeting; later he suggested a circus tent instead. In a sense, the basic meaning is the same whether it is the traditional performance of skilled clowns, acrobats or animal trainers, or that of a religious fundamentalist dramatizing an old religious imagery, what takes place is the use of personal achievement and conviction to bring a crowd to a state of enthusiasm sufficient to make it forget its boredom with everyday routine or its familiar sins of commission or omission.
At this third stage of the seventieth five-fold sequence, the individual person and the collectivity are brought together in a significant performance which subtly strengthens the communal spirit directly or indirectly. The implication of the symbol, whenever it is found operating, is that the time has come for the individual to dare to present himself and his works to his community for applause, or for the purpose of attracting a following. What is suggested is PUBLIC SELF-DRAMATIZATION."
I think that it's plainly obvious as to why the 18th degree of Pisces with this as its Sabian Symbol is the Sabian Symbol for the USA's Part of Intelligence & Skill and its Part of Catastrophe.
To further refine the rectification here of Bidens chart, I do recommend using the Part of Hidden Identity, aka Part of Oratory, aka Part of Influence, and see what comes up depending on the time used, the formula is Asc. + Saturn - Moon, so it might change from one degree to another, seeing that the Moon is a part of the formula?
It was Trump's such Part that convinced me that He would become president, and I stated so here in the forum in January of 2016, when the political pundits were giving Him only a 2% chance of even getting the Republican Party nomination for candidate.
It's a lot of work, I know, as one could look at quite a number of Parts and the Sabian Symbols found for the degrees of the Zodiac they are in...and all that calculating, oh my...!
It's where one earns their salt and the right to call them self an "Astrologer", IMHO, that is by putting in the hours and doing thorough work.
Once you become convinced of the veracity of the Sabian Symbols, and this technique of using the Astrological Parts as they are symbolically active and relevant to the precept of the Part as that precept applies to the native of the chart, you might find yourself consulting Astrological Parts, first and foremost or nearly so, when ever you begin the analysis of a chart that is of someone who is new to you.
When I was attempting to prove to myself the possibility that Pluto was on the Ascendant at the moment Jesus/Yeshu'a of Nazareth was born on the day that the late, renowned, 20th century American clairvoyant, Edgar Cayce, said that Jesus was born on, that when I did finally "dial it in" on the computer screen and then looked at the resultant chart, I first noticed the chart axis was exactly what Dane Rudhyar predicted it would be, i.e. consisting of all four of the first degrees for each of the Cardinal Signs, although, He did have them 180° opposite from where they did show up [
that's what He proposed, or used as to demonstrate, how the Sabians apply to the chart axis, in his book "An Astrological Mandala", in Part Three Chapter 3, "The Cross and the Star", He may have actually thought otherwise, just as they did eventually prove to be? ] When I saw that, I got excited, knowing that the odds of such being a coincidence were slim, as such perfect symmetry only occurs twice a day, no matter what the time of year. On the Winter Solstice, that same year, that symmetry occurring in the 1st degrees of the four Cardinal Signs was from 12:03:16 P.M. to 12:05:55 P.M. for a total time, for that window, of just 2 minutes and 39 seconds.
On the day He actually was born, that same window occurred, from 5:19:18 P.M. to 5:23:38 P.M., for a total of 4 minutes and 20 seconds. As for those four points being opposite as from where the did show up with Pluto conjunct the Asc., those windows were, apprx., 12 hours earlier those same days, although at those times Pluto was on the Desc., but that's not the same astrological affect on a natal chart. That's just a little more than two and a half minutes to a little more than four minutes that the chart axis could have possibly been of that precise symmetry and also in all the first degrees of the four Cardinal Signs.
As for Pluto being conj. one of the degrees of any of those four Cardinal Signs that was only possible that year, 3 A.D. during April, it was well beyond the 1st degree by the following December and it had just entered the 1st degree on that day. Prior to that it was in the third degree of Libra the previous December, and one must look back to January in the year 1 A.D. to find the time before that Pluto was in the 1st degree of Libra....but none of those other dates when Pluto was also in the first degree of Libra produce Astrological Parts that have Sabian Symbols at all meaningful, or relevant, to the Part precepts as those precepts were in relation to the life of the Man as has been written and, or, told as to have been.
[
astrodienst has since deliberately "fudged" the data since I first produced the chart on November 7, in 2004. They were messing around and moving things slightly prior to the date they claim they started using a newer, and different, computer program than the one they originally used that was produced by JPL and is the same that NASA used for years and even sent that latest probe within a few thousand miles of Pluto, he intended target.
As the engineer that developed that ephemeris gave an allowance of plus or minus 2 minutes of a degree for Pluto's position, astrodienst took the full advantage of that and moved Pluto back along the retro path it was in by that allowance, putting it in the 2nd degree. Thus negating my theory and destroying the evidence, except for those copies that I downloaded and also those that were printed, too.
As the Swiss have been providing, free of charge, the soldiers that guard the Pope for hundreds of years, I can easily imagine why they moved it, and likely who asked them to... not to mention that the subsequent findings refute a great deal of traditional astrological beliefs and techniques as well as proving the veracity of the Sabian Symbols and also the tremendous effect that the PLANET Pluto has on astrological conditions, and Pluto's tremendous importance. Thus there is no certainty as to exactly when and for how long Pluto did anything after that date of April2, 3 A.D. as I never expected such a devious thing I didn't bother to try to get anything other than what I initially wanted. i.e. just a look-see to what the result was as to the time of day Pluto did conjunct the Asc. on the date Edgar Cayce said He was born.
All these other considerations came much later, some years later.
I figure that eventually someone will restore the original ephemeris just the way JPL had calculated it to have been, and yet be, as. As I grew up just a few miles from JPL, in Southern California, and my long time friend from high school and college, the late Ed Skrocki, whose father was an engineer at JPL [and it was Ed, by recommendation, that got me my publisher, as for the reputation of the Skrocki family] and that I've a few other former classmates whose fathers also worked at JPL as well as some former classmates that went on to work at JPL themselves, after high school/college... I might be able to persuade someone to make it happen a lot sooner than anyone suspects at present... just sayin'... but I have certainly digressed here, haven't i? ...and How I did.]
To cut to the chase, at this point, when I saw what the chart axis was when I finally got Pluto dialed in as to where it was on the Asc. for that day, and noticed it consisted of all the first degrees of the four Cardinal Signs, the very next thing I did was calculated, on a sheet of paper, where the Part of Fortune was and immediately looked up the Sabian Symbol for that degree of the Zodiac I found it to be in, i.e. the 18th degree of Pisces and saw what Dane had written [ibid.]
"PISCES 18°: "A MASTER INSTRUCTS HIS DISCIPLE", I knew right at that very moment I had produced that natal chart of His, and all the many subsequent findings, so many of them via the Sabian Symbols by way of the Astrological Parts, among other astrological findings, e.g. the incomplete Grand Septile matrix that was completed on the Monday following the first Sunday after the first Full Moon the Spring of 35 A.D., when He was just 32 years of age... just as had been written was the time He was crucified and died on that cross, albeit the day was on the Monday that followed.
So, there is my testimony as to the usefulness of utilizing the Sabian Symbols for matters of rectification of both the time of day of birth ...and the day of birth itself....when it just happened to get lost over many long years... not to mention, also the year.
OF COURSE i ALSO HAD SOME VERY GOOD LUCK, RIGHT?
....right...
...anyways, try noodling around with that time window I proposed that Biden was born within, IN-MHO, of course.
Someone that reads this post, that actually gets to the end of it [whew] might take the challenge up.
May God Bless all who seek for truth. pv