Nexus7
Well-known member
This topic has come up before, but I could not agree more on this one. She uses Bettelheim as an authority, whose theories on autism and 'refrigerator mothers' have been throroughly disproved now - and that is what she does here - blames the mother. I do wonder how that family must have felt, as Liz Greene 'asks to be excused' for putting forward a scenario here. Apart from anything else, she attributes a Mercury/Saturn link in the autism chart where none existed, though I did see what looked to be some interesting midpoints in the chart.In my own opinion, I stay FAR away from Liz Greene. Issues of fate as they relate to illness, specifically illness that could be caused by many outside factors, is coming close to being dogmatic. Liz Greene is very dogmatic. S
But yes - why look for gurus in our astrologers? Dangerous habit, I always think.
Erin Sullivan also looks at a family with a member with autism, and whilst there is a little bit of a tendency to look for 'identified victims,' at least she manages to do so without invoking Bettelheim and his ilk.
What both astrologers did do, perhaps, though with other agendas in mind, was to draw attention to the fact that both mothers seemed to have health problems of their own, hinting at compromised immune systems and ususual sensitivities elsewhere. Ad one thing Liz Greene did speculate was whether or not autism might not be about an intense vulnerability in 'being in the world.'
And why not listen to the evidence of people with autism themselves - I believe the chart for TempleGrandin isavailable, for example. I once, also read a fascinating autobiography of a woman with autism, who did have the mother from hell, who did have a very challenged natal Moon (I had the opportunity to see her chart once, and already suspected this was in large part about afflictions involving her Moon), who did have a very skewed sense of self (child psychosis, child psychosis), but who, interestingly, did not blame her mother in the least for her difficulties, but rather, in the first instance, on multiple food allergies and a faulty digestive system! In fact, she stated that her mother from hell, by not being too emotionally invested in her,actually did her a huge favour as she grew up!
But what was interesting is that many of the way she described her early predicament in life, could have come straight out of the pages of R D Laing. The intense vulnerability of 'being in the world' that Greene divined, is very much alive here, as she talks of a fear of revealing the 'self' and being 'imprisoned by crippled emotional respnses.'
But the thing is, nobody actually, still knows what autism actually 'is.' And it could be, that there is actually more than one cause. Perhaps, the cause has not been found, because it is holistic.
The Chinese, for example, see all disorders in terms of element imbalances and I can think of one that combines sensitivities to food, obsessive thinking and unresolved grief. So maybe in ancient China, there was no autism, no refrigerator mothers, just metal imbalances, that may or may not be passed within family.
It can be easy to find autism in the strangest of places. I have often felt that the Dracula of the original Bram Stoker was actually autistic, for example.